"Alan Gomes" wrote in message
news:GeEKb.76998$xX.543868@attbi_s02...
Steve,

short list. Which model do you have? What do you know about the Schaeffer
units?

I had to choose between the Hood Seafurl and Harken Unit 2.5 MKII. (both
were used, off a Shannon 50).. Both needed rebuild of the swivels..

I tried contacting both Hood and Harken.. Guess how responded to my request
for assistance.. The rebuild on the Harken went very easy and cost me about
$180 for new sets of bearings. The manual was available for download
online..

Since I still have the Hood Seafurl and want to sell it, I have still been
trying to get some model information from Hood.. They respond but don't seem
to understand their old model discriptions and give my incorrect
information.. Even though I have sent them pictures of the drum and swivel..

The Harken is great, very easy to operate single handed.. With a prefeeder,
I can hoist/change sails as easy as a hanked on sail (easier).

For me, the down side of the Harken, was the complications of installation
in the field with my rod head stay.. You have to have the rod 'headed' after
the foil section connectors are on the rod.. So if you ever want to remove
the unit, you have to a problem removing the foils from the head stay..
(BTW. Rod rigging can't be 'headed' in the field.)


--
My opinion and experience. FWIW

Steve
s/v Good Intentions

I had one of these on my Pearson 30 and it was bullet proof/jam proof unit. I
can't imagine how it could jam when installed and used correctly and that's NOT
the case with spooling units.
I wish my C&C 32 had one instead of the Harken!

Capt RB
C&C 32
NY

The problem with this unit is that it tends to unfurl a partially reefed
sail. More than a few owners have had this problem with it. (This model came
as standard issue on Catalinas for a number of years; most owners who have
commented on them in the Catalina 30 list-serve are not too enthusiastic
about them.) Even Hood acknowledges the problem with reefing and says that
the continuous line units such as the 810 LD should be upgraded to a single
line unit if one wishes to use it for reefing.

You are probably correct about it being jam resistant, though.

What don't you like about the Harken? Which model do you have on your C&C?
I've heard that Harken makes a good furler.

--Alan Gomes

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I had one of these on my Pearson 30 and it was bullet proof/jam proof
unit. I
can't imagine how it could jam when installed and used correctly and
that's NOT
the case with spooling units.
I wish my C&C 32 had one instead of the Harken!

Capt RB
C&C 32
NY

Even Hood acknowledges the problem with reefing and says that
the continuous line units such as the 810 LD should be upgraded to a single
line unit if one wishes to use it for reefing.

You are probably correct about it being jam resistant, though.

What don't you like about the Harken? Which model do you have on your C&C?
I've heard that Harken makes a good furler.

When I learned about the hood, I found that it was NOT a reefer, only a furler.
Used in that regard it was excellent. We made occasional headsail changes when
conditions warranted. We found that we could reef with it, but I could easily
see that larger cam cleats were in order for it to be a reliable system.
I have an Older harken II on the C&C 32. It's only jammed once and it certainly
needed adjustment, but I feel that ALL spooling furlers can jam for some reason
ot another and the continuous line can't. I had a pretty bad experience with a
new scheafer unit as well, at least until I got it "just right." No such
worries with the Hood, which never required anything.


RB

Even Hood acknowledges the problem with reefing and says that
the continuous line units such as the 810 LD should be upgraded to a single
line unit if one wishes to use it for reefing.

You are probably correct about it being jam resistant, though.

What don't you like about the Harken? Which model do you have on your C&C?
I've heard that Harken makes a good furler.

When I learned about the hood, I found that it was NOT a reefer, only a furler.
Used in that regard it was excellent. We made occasional headsail changes when
conditions warranted. We found that we could reef with it, but I could easily
see that larger cam cleats were in order for it to be a reliable system.
I have an Older harken II on the C&C 32. It's only jammed once and it certainly
needed adjustment, but I feel that ALL spooling furlers can jam for some reason
ot another and the continuous line can't. I had a pretty bad experience with a
new scheafer unit as well, at least until I got it "just right." No such
worries with the Hood, which never required anything.


RB

The problem with this unit is that it tends to unfurl a partially reefed
sail. More than a few owners have had this problem with it. (This model came
as standard issue on Catalinas for a number of years; most owners who have
commented on them in the Catalina 30 list-serve are not too enthusiastic
about them.) Even Hood acknowledges the problem with reefing and says that
the continuous line units such as the 810 LD should be upgraded to a single
line unit if one wishes to use it for reefing.

You are probably correct about it being jam resistant, though.

What don't you like about the Harken? Which model do you have on your C&C?
I've heard that Harken makes a good furler.

--Alan Gomes

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I had one of these on my Pearson 30 and it was bullet proof/jam proof
unit. I
can't imagine how it could jam when installed and used correctly and
that's NOT
the case with spooling units.
I wish my C&C 32 had one instead of the Harken!

Capt RB
C&C 32
NY

I had one of these on my Pearson 30 and it was bullet proof/jam proof unit. I
can't imagine how it could jam when installed and used correctly and that's NOT
the case with spooling units.
I wish my C&C 32 had one instead of the Harken!

Capt RB
C&C 32
NY