Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
You never heard of nuclear fusion? That's more energy out than in. It's
not so far-fetched to believe if it can be done at an atomic level then
why not at a molecular level.


jeff wrote:
Its clear why you were a English major.


I love it.... "Nuclear fusion at a molecular level"
Funniest thing I've seen in a while.

DSK

wrote in message
oups.com...
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
You never heard of nuclear fusion? That's more energy out than in. It's
not so far-fetched to believe if it can be done at an atomic level then
why not at a molecular level.


jeff wrote:
Its clear why you were a English major.


I love it.... "Nuclear fusion at a molecular level"
Funniest thing I've seen in a while.

DSK




Hey, there's nuclear fusion on a much larger scale than molecular... family
bonding for example, something of which Neal has no clew.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
I love it.... "Nuclear fusion at a molecular level"
Funniest thing I've seen in a while.

DSK




Hey, there's nuclear fusion on a much larger scale than molecular...
family bonding for example, something of which Neal has no clew.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com


You are right-that can produce a lot of heat...

On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:51:43 -0700, wrote:

Its clear why you were a English major.


I love it.... "Nuclear fusion at a molecular level"
Funniest thing I've seen in a while.
You missed the viruses smaller than a chloride ion. Smaller than water
he said. Then there was the carbon molecules.

Casady