Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:56:08 -0000, "
wrote: On Sep 10, 1:02 pm, Larry wrote: ... My discussion involves a whole different way of distillation in POWER boats with ENGINES running....not hermits living on the hook. ... I take it from the nasty ad hominem zinger that I'm being a pain. Sorry about that. Just for the record, there are many very desirable cruising destinations that have plenty of people but not much fresh water. In those spots an efficient water maker is a wonderful tool for sociable cruisers. Also for the record, I'm not trying to be a pain. But, at the risk of seeming negative, since you completely ignored my question I'll ask it one more time: what is the motivation to use steam distillation even in "POWER boats with ENGINES running" when the same amount of heat differential would give you vastly more fresh water if you used it to run R/O filtration? My understanding is that Larry simply prefers distilled water, and has given reasons why. Mineral content, and possible bacterial contamination of RO water. Though I am not well versed in this, and have not tested the waters. distilled and RO are different, aren't they? He never said distilling was more energy efficient than RO, but was looking to capture engine waste heat to make distilling more efficient than it is using conventional methods. And if it could be done, it would be of benefit to sailboats too, since they are often under power, and their engines waste many, BTUs. Capturing wasted BTUs is the most important issue. --Vic |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-09-07 14:36:05 -0400, Vic Smith said:
What's the cost of some common bottled water? Never drink it, but maybe some brands are low in minerals. Most bottled waters are lightly filtered "city" or well water. Perrier used to (may still) bottle Chester County, PA well water. Took so much out that my friends had to dig a deeper well. You can probably get better water for FAR less by putting a simple filter on your house supply. We have a filter and dedicated "drinking water" tap at the kitchen sink. Most minerals won't be filtered out, but some of the "gunk" Larry's talking about will be. I also have kidney stone problems, but the filter is sufficient for me as our water's fairly "soft" to begin with. -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-09-08 21:40:35 -0400, Larry said:
in powerboats like trawlers, motor yachts, bubbleboats. Anything guzzling that kind of fuel is making a LOT of waste heat and simply dumping it overboard. You might be surprised. Friend had a 42' trawler that used about 1 gph to go 8-10 knots. New boat is 55', but still only uses about 3 gph for slightly higher speeds. There's not that much waste heat to use. -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
...My understanding is that Larry simply prefers distilled water, ...
Oh, if that's all then I think it is a great idea. I thought his argument was that distilling using engine heat was more efficient and was responding to his post of Sept 8 where he said: "And any RO uses more power which equals more fuel expense we can no longer afford. It's a shame to let so much heat just blow out the stacks and be poured overboard as hot seawater when there are so many uses for it....like distillation, heat engines driving gensets, etc. " This confused me because RO uses much LESS energy than steam distillation. So, basically the question I've been asking all along is: If the heat is available to do work then why not use it to make RO water which will give you a lot more water for your work than steam? I gather from you that the answer is "because I want steam distilled water and I don't get any of that from RO." I'm good with that. It was the "more power" thing that threw me. ... Though I am not well versed in this, and have not tested the waters. distilled and RO are different, aren't they? Yes, Larry is right, there may be qualitative differences between typical RO water and steam distilled water. His preferences in this seem defensible to me as long as we're talking about drinking water and not washing or cooking water. RO desalinated water is probably better than the water that comes out of your taps at home if you don't filter it. It is good enough for drinking -- I'm a lot happier drinking it than the water that gets used in most of the developing world -- but for some things steam distilled could be better yet. Steam distilled water is a luxury version of drinking water. He never said distilling was more energy efficient than RO, but was looking to capture engine waste heat to make distilling more efficient than it is using conventional methods. I thought he did say distilling was more energy efficient which is why I was confused. And if it could be done, it would be of benefit to sailboats too, since they are often under power, and their engines waste many, BTUs. ... I think Larry said he didn't think it would be practical for sailboats (he used all those big letters), but it would be neat if it was workable and affordable. I'm hoping he will do the hard work for us by rigging up a prototype on his diesel truck and then share the results with us. It would be lovely if it worked! Capturing wasted BTUs is the most important issue. Now you've confused me -- bless my heart I am dumber than a box of rocks. I was good with "I steam distill water because I want steam distilled water", but if capturing the BTUs is the most important issue then why use an inefficient desalination system like steam distilling? -- Tom. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:39:21 -0700, "
wrote: Capturing wasted BTUs is the most important issue. Now you've confused me -- bless my heart I am dumber than a box of rocks. I was good with "I steam distill water because I want steam distilled water", but if capturing the BTUs is the most important issue then why use an inefficient desalination system like steam distilling? Well, it's pretty well established - I think - that Larry doesn't want RO water. He wants distilled water. You have said, "Steam distilled water is a luxury version of drinking water." IMO, Larry is not one bit averse to luxury. At the same time, and perhaps in other threads, Larry has talked about engine waste heat recovery as a separate issue. And it is. How the waste heat is used is a different matter entirely, though Larry happened to be talking about distilling when it came up, or maybe he was thinking about waste heat and distilling all at once. Hell if I know. But theoretically you may use the waste heat to generate electricity to run RO, the TV, an A/C unit, etc, or to heat hot water for the shower, or to distill. The only one I see happening is heating the hot water tank, which is closer to a distilling system than to a system that generates electricity. Hey, too bad they don't make thermal blankets/material that could enclose an engine compartment and generate electricity from the heat. I'm not up in physics, and don't know how solar cells work, whether they use UV or IR, but they work. I offer my apologies to Larry for butting in and making assumptions, but figured he could use some time with his parrots anyway. --Vic |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
ups.com: But, at the risk of seeming negative, since you completely ignored my question I'll ask it one more time: what is the motivation to use steam distillation even in "POWER boats with ENGINES running" when the same amount of heat differential would give you vastly more fresh water if you used it to run R/O filtration? And, I'll answer it for you. Distillation requires little maintenance and ALWAYS makes PURE water with the simplest carbon filtration. RO ONLY makes "good water" when it's new and meticulously maintained, degrading from that first moment you flip the switch until the bugs start leaking through it making everyone sick. Distillation requires me to decalcify the boiler once a year. I change the carbon filter every few months of continuous use. RO is FAR from perfect....especially a unit sold to some CONSUMER made of the usual cheap crap. The cheapest consumer distiller makes the same distilled water my commercial distillery makes....even if it's 10 years old. How'd I do? Are your glasses less rosey on RO? Larry -- RO - One pinhole and everyone dies..... |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
oups.com: but if capturing the BTUs is the most important issue then why use an inefficient desalination system like steam distilling? Because boiling seawater into steam from the waste heat off an engine is about as simple a thing to do as you can get. To make an RO run off waste heat, you have to convert it to PRESSURE, probably to electricity to run the RO's pump and computer, right? I want to simply boil seawater into steam in heat exchangers running off hot exhaust gasses and engine coolant....making distilled water for NOTHING in fuel and very little in maintenance. Larry -- Search youtube for "Depleted Uranium" The ultimate dirty bomb...... |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jere Lull wrote in news:2007091021343611272-
jerelull@maccom: We have a filter and dedicated "drinking water" tap at the kitchen sink. What bothers me about "filters" is the same thing that bothers me about RO. Whatever is filtered from the water backs up on whatever filter media is used, whether it's a paper and carbon filter...or an expensive RO membrane. In an undersink filter, with no backflush capability, there it sets...for months...or YEARS....breaking down under the water pressure and flow into SMALLER, less filterable, more toxic things. Once it has broken down far enough, it passes THROUGH the filter into the drinking supply...bacterial toxins that cause Legionaires' Disease is a good example. Viruses are so small they aren't filtered in the first place! The filters aren't molecular level. There are NO viruses in distilled water....NOT EVEN DEAD ONES. Distilled water is safe even if the CIA pours Anthrax into the water to reduce Social Security costs or for false flag operations to keep us under control, a real possibility lately. Am I better off filtering or drinking the water straight? Noone I can find in the filter business wants to talk about what happens on the pressure side of the filter element "as-time-goes-by". I can't even get a straight answer from the SC Dept of Health and Environmental Control on this subject. This may be because every coffee pot in every restaurant has this little metal filter in its water supply line that is NEVER changed unless the whole machine changes. I'm sure glad it's boiled before I drink it! The iced tea is NOT! Most of it is just water poured in as the tea brews...filtered, of course. Larry -- |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry wrote: Jere Lull wrote in news:2007091021343611272- jerelull@maccom: We have a filter and dedicated "drinking water" tap at the kitchen sink. What bothers me about "filters" is the same thing that bothers me about RO. Whatever is filtered from the water backs up on whatever filter media is used, whether it's a paper and carbon filter...or an expensive RO membrane. In an undersink filter, with no backflush capability, there it sets...for months...or YEARS....breaking down under the water pressure and flow into SMALLER, less filterable, more toxic things. Once it has broken down far enough, it passes THROUGH the filter into the drinking supply...bacterial toxins that cause Legionaires' Disease is a good example. Uhmmm, no that's not an example at all, let alone a good one. Legionnair's disease is not caused by broken down anything, or by bacterial *toxins*, it's caused by an infection with the bacterium Legionella pneumophila. Viruses are so small they aren't filtered in the first place! The filters aren't molecular level. There are NO viruses in distilled water....NOT EVEN DEAD ONES. Distilled water is safe even if the CIA pours Anthrax into the water to reduce Social Security costs or for false flag operations to keep us under control, a real possibility lately. Depends on whether your still is really effective or not. If you're only condensing *steam*, i.e. not water vapor but gaseous steam, you may be correct. However, unless your still is a multi-effect (doubtful) or uses some form of cyclonic separation (doubtful), and uses some form of demisting (also doubtful), you don't have quite the assurance you think you do. Almost certainly any organisms will be inactivated, but you may still have endotoxin carryover. Am I better off filtering or drinking the water straight? Noone I can find in the filter business wants to talk about what happens on the pressure side of the filter element "as-time-goes-by". Then you're not talking to knowledgeable people. Just Google Minncare and you'll find what most everyone uses for biofilm control. As time goes by, a biofilm will build up without proper maintenance. I can't even get a straight answer from the SC Dept of Health and Environmental Control on this subject. This may be because every coffee pot in every restaurant has this little metal filter in its water supply line that is NEVER changed unless the whole machine changes. I'm sure glad it's boiled before I drink it! The iced tea is NOT! Most of it is just water poured in as the tea brews...filtered, of course. Well Larry, rail as you will about RO, but you can make Water for Injection with double pass RO. That's injection, in your veins, and you worry about drinking it? Granted, there's a further *sterilization* step, but that has nothing to do with all the "toxins" you seem obsessed with. Keith Hughes |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 10, 6:23 pm, Larry wrote:
" wrote groups.com: but if capturing the BTUs is the most important issue then why use an inefficient desalination system like steam distilling? Because boiling seawater into steam from the waste heat off an engine is about as simple a thing to do as you can get. To make an RO run off waste heat, you have to convert it to PRESSURE, probably to electricity to run the RO's pump and computer, right? I want to simply boil seawater into steam in heat exchangers running off hot exhaust gasses and engine coolant....making distilled water for NOTHING in fuel and very little in maintenance. ... Simple is good. I wish you well with it. Just so you know, RO doesn't need electricity any more than steam does. You just need to push water through a membrane. My Spectra system has only one electrical component and that's an off the shelf pressure water pump. It has no electronics. -- Tom. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NAUTIC SHOP CLEARANCE | Boat Building | |||
NAUTIC SHOP CLEARANCE | Electronics | |||
E Machine Shop | ASA | |||
Treasure from the Thrift Store (long) | Cruising |