Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry, somehow the saying "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
kept popping into my head as I read your post. It is my understanding that phase change methods of water purification take about an order of magnitude more energy than filtration systems to convert sea water to drinkable water. So, it seems to me that if you are going to harness the "excess" heat or the excess velocity of the exhaust gases to convert sea water to potable water you would be much better off using R/0 in pure heat terms. Doubtlessly I am missing something obvious but perhaps I am not alone in this as most cruise ships and municipalities that do seawater conversion use R/O even though they tend to have lots of heat available from their diesel generation systems. Sorry to be dense about this. What am I missing? -- Tom. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NAUTIC SHOP CLEARANCE | Boat Building | |||
NAUTIC SHOP CLEARANCE | Electronics | |||
E Machine Shop | ASA | |||
Treasure from the Thrift Store (long) | Cruising |