Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The reason often given as to why ball valves are not "acceptable" on thru-hulls
is that they lack the support that seacocks have. That support MIGHT be needed to close them in an emergency and could possible break off (with disasterous results unless you had some tapered wood plugs handy). Yet many boats come equipped with properly functioning ball valves. I think the key here is make sure your ball valves continue to properly function by actuating them once a month or so and lubricating the top and bottom of the ball at least annually. If they are working properly, they are probably safe enough. Certainly safer than a seacock that has not been maintained.... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cathodic Protection for Aluminum Hull - Need Help | General | |||
Hull Waxing Question | General | |||
Angle of prop shaft - theoretical question | General | |||
Thru Hull Question | Boat Building | |||
Narrow hull speed question | Boat Building |