Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some comments below.
Doug s/v Callista "Len Krauss" wrote in message ... Agree with comments that it's better to agitate with fuel rather than air. Getting effective action would seem to call for an additional pump (high volume) and separate pick-up and return line. Many boat owners won't want to add this expense and complication to their polishing systems. On the other hand, a small air compressor or inflator is more apt to be available. A separate polishing systems is what I am intending to do. I actually think it is simpler than an integrated approach with the exception of an addition uptake and return. As the return line usually enters at the tank bottom, just circulating fuel at a high rate before starting polishing and periodically will help. A high output pump with filter bypass valving can be used for dual purposes -- a small volume of fuel goes through filter (with check valve on output), while most bypasses it and enters the return inlet with force. I this really true about returns usually entering the bottom. No boat I have ever had it set up that way. From what a surveyor told me any access other that via the top is against code as it makes possible catastrophic loss of fuel into the bilge. Another polishing approach is draw fuel from a bottom return line and return it tank via fill fitting. The theory here is that most of the bad stuff is near the bottom -- All the polish systems I have seen draw fuel from the bottom for that exact reason. Return has always been through the top. Perhaps a return line laying in the bottom of the tank with lots of holes (like a soaker hose). Trick would be to get it into the tank. Eliminate "ns" for email address. "Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... In article , Len Krauss wrote: Second step is to, while polishing, agitate fuel at bottom of tank using a small L-shaped air discharge pushed down to tank bottom on a rod or dowel and turned about as much as possible. Obviously the fuel furthest away from the discharge will get the least agitation and baffles will reduce degree of agitation for sure. But with the L-shaped discharge at the bottom and turned, disturbance will flow through baffle bottom notches. The basic idea is to get crud in suspension and moving so it can be captured by the polishing pick up and filtered out. You are correct!!!! but dont use air. Tank farms use whats known as a *sparging nozzle* to keep the tank in constant agitation. Its simply a jet of liquid that discharges into a throat of a venturi section. The velocity from the jet into the venturi 'entrains' the liquid in the bottom of tank to circulate. A sparger moves the layers on the bottom of the tank towards the top; hence, affects a mixing. (for techies amoung us, a sparging nozzle {sparger} in an 'open inlet eductor') If you use air, you generate a lot of air entrainment which can settle out and coalesce into larger and larger bubbles of air .... and block the downstream system. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Problem changing out my fuel pump | General | |||
Engine dies- Putters when trying to plane- engine under under heavy load | General | |||
Can a single 72 gal per hour fuel pump run two 392 cu inch motors? | General | |||
Inboard won't run above 2800 RPM | General | |||
Fuel pump to carbs fuel line replacement | General |