| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rich Hampel" wrote
(Some excellent and useful information) I should have mentioned the 100 hour filter change in my post. That's about three seasons of operation for my service profile. There isn't a speck of water in my Racor settlement bowl but I think a filter change next season is indicated anyway. -- Roger Long |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:36:22 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote: .... if you are using the typical resinated paper filter elements (Racor, etc.) AND you have noticed free water in the sump of your filter .... then increase your normal changeout schedule OR keep a record of the differential operating pressure of the filter at near engine wide-open-throttle (WOT) ..... Roger Long There is one user group even more dependent on reliable engine performance than water craft users - light aircraft pilots. So it's no accident that a pre flight walk round includes a fuel sample (off the bottom of all tanks, and at the prefilter) to dump all water trapped in the fuel. A sampler valve might be a good idea for boaters too?? Brian Whatcott Altus OK |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have about 12 inches of clearance under my aluminum tank, a highly unusual
configuration. On my list of big projects is to cut into the flat bottom and attach a big sump for water and other crud to sink into. It's a nutty design with a big flat bottom so there is no sump point but it probably keeps any stuff in the bottom of the tank swirling around in suspension so it goes through the filters bit by bit. The suction is in the center so unlikely to pick up much. Maybe it isn't such a bad design after all. -- Roger Long |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
That would be against ABYS & USCG specifications.
Marine tanks cant have any 'outlet' lower than the top of the tank ... leakage considerations. A surveyor would have a heart attack in finding a tank with a 'bottom tank', your insurance carrier would probably 'not allow' any claim that resulted in a faulty bottom tap. The CG wouldnt care ... the fine is the same if you pumped or inadvertantly dumped the oil. Use a separate 'dip tube' all the way to the bottom for water suction. OR ... use a 'water knock out pot' as the first stage in the fuel filtering system ... just an empty filter housing with a bottom tap thats attached to clear (tygon, etc.) tube. Most of the water will gravimetrically settle in the 'knockout pot'. When you see water in the tube you drain it. :-) In article , Roger Long wrote: I have about 12 inches of clearance under my aluminum tank, a highly unusual configuration. On my list of big projects is to cut into the flat bottom and attach a big sump for water and other crud to sink into. It's a nutty design with a big flat bottom so there is no sump point but it probably keeps any stuff in the bottom of the tank swirling around in suspension so it goes through the filters bit by bit. The suction is in the center so unlikely to pick up much. Maybe it isn't such a bad design after all. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... That would be against ABYS & USCG specifications. Marine tanks cant have any 'outlet' lower than the top of the tank ... leakage considerations. A surveyor would have a heart attack in finding a tank with a 'bottom tank', your insurance carrier would probably 'not allow' any claim that resulted in a faulty bottom tap. The CG wouldnt care ... the fine is the same if you pumped or inadvertantly dumped the oil. Use a separate 'dip tube' all the way to the bottom for water suction. OR ... use a 'water knock out pot' as the first stage in the fuel filtering system ... just an empty filter housing with a bottom tap thats attached to clear (tygon, etc.) tube. Most of the water will gravimetrically settle in the 'knockout pot'. When you see water in the tube you drain it. :-) FWIW, Essie was built with a tank that has a bottom tap, and she has been surveyed more than once. She is also insured. But then, she was built in 1963. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where did I say that there would be a valve or outlet in the sump?
-- Roger Long |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
* Brian Whatcott wrote, On 6/4/2007 9:19 AM:
There is one user group even more dependent on reliable engine performance than water craft users - light aircraft pilots. So it's no accident that a pre flight walk round includes a fuel sample (off the bottom of all tanks, and at the prefilter) to dump all water trapped in the fuel. A sampler valve might be a good idea for boaters too?? I would second that. My previous boat had an aluminum tank that was odd shaped with one corner sticking down. That corner collected about a few ozs of water which eventually corroded through the tank. A drain would have saved a nasty repair. In fact, I think it would be hard to find a shop willing to do such a repair nowadays. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:33:58 -0400, Jeff wrote:
* Brian Whatcott wrote, On 6/4/2007 9:19 AM: There is one user group even more dependent on reliable engine performance than water craft users - light aircraft pilots. So it's no accident that a pre flight walk round includes a fuel sample (off the bottom of all tanks, and at the prefilter) to dump all water trapped in the fuel. A sampler valve might be a good idea for boaters too?? I would second that. My previous boat had an aluminum tank that was odd shaped with one corner sticking down. That corner collected about a few ozs of water which eventually corroded through the tank. A drain would have saved a nasty repair. In fact, I think it would be hard to find a shop willing to do such a repair nowadays. I mention quick drains from time to time. You can buy them in several screw threads.[Use Aviation Trader] Activated by a pin and sampler cup, or by a push n twist fitting. They use double valves for security. But I have heard it said that a tank drain may be a no-no in some boat reg versions. Brian Whatcott Altus OK |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wouldn't put a quick drain in a boat. I've seen too many puddles under
aircraft where the implications of a leak are far less serious. A little engine stuttering in an aircraft on a tight takeoff can kill you. Fuel leaking slowly out of a wing won't (usually). Aircraft also have very minimal fuel filtering. -- Roger Long |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 2007-06-04 09:19:44 -0400, Brian Whatcott said:
So it's no accident that a pre flight walk round includes a fuel sample (off the bottom of all tanks, and at the prefilter) to dump all water trapped in the fuel. A sampler valve might be a good idea for boaters too?? Our Racor 500 has such a valve in the bowl. -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Some basic steps for saving fuel, (reposted from last January) | General | |||
| Fuel Polishing, in general | Boat Building | |||
| Fuel Polishing, in general | Cruising | |||
| Results of bozo bin... | General | |||
| Ignorant Dupes | ASA | |||