Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If there's some kind of metal ring at the top of the mast that's grounded by the various shrouds and stays, that's great. A metal cap that can take a pretty good strike, might also keep a hit from boiling the sap in the mast, creating a steam explosion and putting you out of the sailing business. This alone makes a mast top bypass cap a good thing. Larry yes, it is just as you describe, but this generates another question (sorry). I had often thought of putting a pointed copper rod on top grounded to the stays as per many books and articles on the matter. I have never done so because I believed that it would act as an attractant, rather like Benjamin Franklin's key on the kite string. Also what got hit first during the lightning strike in Malaysia - the day we went back into the water before setting out across the Indian Ocean mind you - was the VHF aerial. the question is - does the damned thing act as a lightning attractor as it is the highest thing there? cheers Peter |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Hendra wrote in
: Ocean mind you - was the VHF aerial. the question is - does the damned thing act as a lightning attractor as it is the highest thing there? Yes, it will. But, that's the best place for the best VHF coverage, unfortunately. Our main antenna got hit, so I moved both of the VHF antennas to an L bracket in the shadow of the shrouds down the side of the mast a ways. The VHF antennas are about 4' down the mast, out away from it about 24 inches between the mast and the shroud, sorta centered. It's always a compromise, but it seems to work as well there as it did on top, exposed to the blast. VHF only has to reach to the horizon, you know, as it's incapable of going further than that radio horizon just over the visual one. If it meets that requirement, it's fine. Larry -- |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:53:07 +0000, Larry wrote:
Again, Thanks for this Larry. I shall do this also, tomorrow morning. It is only a matter of moving it down. The one that got hit just vapourised. The replacement I took off here to paint the mast - it was one of those clamp in wire ones. Spent two hours hunting for it and decided that it was cheaper to buy a new one. cheers Peter Peter Hendra wrote in : Ocean mind you - was the VHF aerial. the question is - does the damned thing act as a lightning attractor as it is the highest thing there? Yes, it will. But, that's the best place for the best VHF coverage, unfortunately. Our main antenna got hit, so I moved both of the VHF antennas to an L bracket in the shadow of the shrouds down the side of the mast a ways. The VHF antennas are about 4' down the mast, out away from it about 24 inches between the mast and the shroud, sorta centered. It's always a compromise, but it seems to work as well there as it did on top, exposed to the blast. VHF only has to reach to the horizon, you know, as it's incapable of going further than that radio horizon just over the visual one. If it meets that requirement, it's fine. Larry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ping Larry - Circuit Breakers | Electronics | |||
Ping: Larry | Cruising | |||
Ping: Larry | Cruising | |||
ping Larry | Cruising | |||
So where is...................... | General |