Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:48:30 -0800, Lloyd Sumpter wrote: Hi, Whenever I need to work on my prop, etc. underwater, I've just slapped on the mask and fins and held my breath. But I've always wondered: why not rig up a hose arrangement to be able to breathe? We're not talking 50-ft depths here, so I'd think it would be pretty safe. Perhaps some kind of non-collapsable hose on the end of a snorkel? Does anyone do this? Why or why not? There are two problems. 1) Unless you have a seperate exhaust path (usually via a valve directly into the water) you can't push the "bad" air, out of the snorkle very far. If the volume of the snorkel tube is a significant fraction of your lung volume, you just pusț the air up the tube, and then draw that same air, back into your lungs. 2) The pressure at say, 7 feet depth, is about 1.5 atmospheres, so you will be drawing in 1 atmos air, against 1.5 atmos pressure on your lungs. Try it. Take a garden hose down to 7 feet, with the other end in the air, (of course, keeping the water out of it) and try taking a breath through it. You will be able to do it, for a while, maybe a minute, by exhaling through your nose, but you'll give your diaphram a real workout. The usual solution, is either a tank+reg with a really long hose in between or a hookah setup. The tank's a lot cheaper, especially if you allready have the tank and the regulator, the hose isn't too expensive. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/pspKd90bcYOAWPYRAnD3AKDGpbObVHddXgw1m2JPkEb/+kz5JwCffVEL TlnpigBCVJ4BVFSWbsmC0QI= =Vful -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock "What I look forward to is continued immaturity followed by death." -- Dave Barry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cheap and Nasty Knotmeter | General |