Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Glenn Ashmore
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension

It would be extremely dificult if not impossible to breath through a
hose at surface pressure if your lungs get more than 2 or 3 feet under
water. The difference at 3' is only about 1.5 pounds per square inch
but the water is pressing on a couple thousand square inches of lung
surface.

Lloyd Sumpter wrote:

Hi,

Whenever I need to work on my prop, etc. underwater, I've just slapped
on the mask and fins and held my breath. But I've always wondered: why not
rig up a hose arrangement to be able to breathe? We're not talking 50-ft
depths here, so I'd think it would be pretty safe. Perhaps some kind of
non-collapsable hose on the end of a snorkel?

Does anyone do this? Why or why not?

Lloyd Sumpter
"Far Cove" Catalina 36


--
Glenn Ashmore

I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack
there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com
Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com

  #2   Report Post  
Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension

"GA" == Glenn Ashmore writes:

GA It would be extremely dificult if not impossible to breath through a
GA hose at surface pressure if your lungs get more than 2 or 3 feet under
GA water. The difference at 3' is only about 1.5 pounds per square inch
GA but the water is pressing on a couple thousand square inches of lung
GA surface.

The real problem is the "dead volume" in your snorkel. You will be
inhaling your own breath over and over again.

snip

--
Strange attractors stole my wife
  #3   Report Post  
LaBomba182
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension

Subject: Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension
From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen


"GA" == Glenn Ashmore writes:


GA It would be extremely dificult if not impossible to breath through
a
GA hose at surface pressure if your lungs get more than 2 or 3 feet
under
GA water. The difference at 3' is only about 1.5 pounds per square inch
GA but the water is pressing on a couple thousand square inches of
lung
GA surface.

The real problem is the "dead volume" in your snorkel. You will be
inhaling your own breath over and over again.


No, the real problem is just as Glenn has stated.

Capt. Bill
  #4   Report Post  
Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension

"L" == LaBomba182 writes:

Subject: Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension
From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen


"GA" == Glenn Ashmore writes:


GA It would be extremely dificult if not impossible to breath through
a

GA hose at surface pressure if your lungs get more than 2 or 3 feet
under

GA water. The difference at 3' is only about 1.5 pounds per square inch
GA but the water is pressing on a couple thousand square inches of
lung

GA surface.

The real problem is the "dead volume" in your snorkel. You will be
inhaling your own breath over and over again.


L No, the real problem is just as Glenn has stated.

L Capt. Bill

Maybe. People have tried longer snorkels before and died from it.
That's a real problem in my book.

--
Strange attractors stole my wife
  #5   Report Post  
Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension

"L" == LaBomba182 writes:

Subject: Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension
From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen


"GA" == Glenn Ashmore writes:


GA It would be extremely dificult if not impossible to breath through
a

GA hose at surface pressure if your lungs get more than 2 or 3 feet
under

GA water. The difference at 3' is only about 1.5 pounds per square inch
GA but the water is pressing on a couple thousand square inches of
lung

GA surface.

The real problem is the "dead volume" in your snorkel. You will be
inhaling your own breath over and over again.


L No, the real problem is just as Glenn has stated.

L Capt. Bill

Maybe. People have tried longer snorkels before and died from it.
That's a real problem in my book.

--
Strange attractors stole my wife


  #6   Report Post  
LaBomba182
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension

Subject: Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension
From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen


"GA" == Glenn Ashmore writes:


GA It would be extremely dificult if not impossible to breath through
a
GA hose at surface pressure if your lungs get more than 2 or 3 feet
under
GA water. The difference at 3' is only about 1.5 pounds per square inch
GA but the water is pressing on a couple thousand square inches of
lung
GA surface.

The real problem is the "dead volume" in your snorkel. You will be
inhaling your own breath over and over again.


No, the real problem is just as Glenn has stated.

Capt. Bill
  #7   Report Post  
Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheap And Nasty Snorkel extension

"GA" == Glenn Ashmore writes:

GA It would be extremely dificult if not impossible to breath through a
GA hose at surface pressure if your lungs get more than 2 or 3 feet under
GA water. The difference at 3' is only about 1.5 pounds per square inch
GA but the water is pressing on a couple thousand square inches of lung
GA surface.

The real problem is the "dead volume" in your snorkel. You will be
inhaling your own breath over and over again.

snip

--
Strange attractors stole my wife
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cheap and Nasty Knotmeter Lloyd Sumpter General 9 January 23rd 04 07:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017