Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 2
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

Hello America and ships at sea,.. I just got a Kenwood R-1000 receiver
and I was wondering if anyone knew what kind of antenna I could rig up
for it. Can I clip something on to the stainless steel backstay and
expect to get a signal? I'm watching the other ssb thread that
suggests you can get a weather fax from it too. Thanks as always.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,275
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

ray lunder wrote in
:

Can I clip something on to the stainless steel backstay and
expect to get a signal?


Lots of sailboats have the neatest little antenna fed right into the main
cabin.....where the chainplate bolts hold the shrouds to the plastic. Most
of them are not grounded at this point. Hell, most of them are not
grounded at all, leaving you with an ungrounded lightning rod sticking up
out of the water just waiting to be hit, killing the family instantly.
It's simply a credit to the conductivity of seawater that it doesn't happen
more often than it does.

So, if you just add another nut to a handy, existing chainplate bolt and
put the hot wire of your receiver to it, you end up with a dandy antenna
just waiting for a lightning hit. If you run a heavy battery cable WITHOUT
those neat right angles boaters love from the bottom of the mast step to
the engine block, it will shunt off MOST, but not all, of the static
buildup that threatens the receiver and everyone aboard. It's not perfect
but it is safer.

Why didn't "they" ground everything? M-O-N-E-Y...same as always.

Larry
--
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 41
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

ray lunder wrote:
Hello America and ships at sea,.. I just got a Kenwood R-1000 receiver
and I was wondering if anyone knew what kind of antenna I could rig up
for it. Can I clip something on to the stainless steel backstay and
expect to get a signal? I'm watching the other ssb thread that
suggests you can get a weather fax from it too. Thanks as always.



Hello Ray,

Sure, you can try the lifelines, the backstay, or a random length of
wire you have handy. Try them all. See which works best.

The downside of that sort of antenna is that it is likely to pick up a
lot of unwanted noise as well as signals of interest. Of course, at sea
the noise issue will be less. If you find reception is poor with these
antennas, you can always use an antenna resonant at the frequency of
interest (hopefully you won't have more than one or two of these) or you
can use a simple antenna tuner. For reception only, the tuner can use
very small and inexpensive components.

Keep in mind that we're at the bottom of the 11-year sunspot cycle and
high frequency propagation can be pitiful at times.

Chuck

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,275
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

chuck wrote in news:1173789524_25635
@sp6iad.superfeed.net:

high frequency propagation can be pitiful at times


"Pitiful" can be ZERO at times, recently....it's awful.

Larry
--

  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:30:57 +0000, Larry wrote:

high frequency propagation can be pitiful at times


"Pitiful" can be ZERO at times, recently....it's awful.


Any sign yet of an upturn in the cycle?

At night the only thing that's working for me on Winlink/Pactor is
80M.



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 2
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:43:10 -0500, Larry wrote:

ray lunder wrote in
:

Can I clip something on to the stainless steel backstay and
expect to get a signal?


Lots of sailboats have the neatest little antenna fed right into the main
cabin.....where the chainplate bolts hold the shrouds to the plastic. Most
of them are not grounded at this point. Hell, most of them are not
grounded at all, leaving you with an ungrounded lightning rod sticking up
out of the water just waiting to be hit, killing the family instantly.
It's simply a credit to the conductivity of seawater that it doesn't happen
more often than it does.

So, if you just add another nut to a handy, existing chainplate bolt and
put the hot wire of your receiver to it, you end up with a dandy antenna
just waiting for a lightning hit. If you run a heavy battery cable WITHOUT
those neat right angles boaters love from the bottom of the mast step to
the engine block, it will shunt off MOST, but not all, of the static
buildup that threatens the receiver and everyone aboard. It's not perfect
but it is safer.

Why didn't "they" ground everything? M-O-N-E-Y...same as always.

Larry


So what would a proper boat antenna look like? Examples, pictures,
name brands? Thanks as always.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,275
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

Wayne.B wrote in
:

Any sign yet of an upturn in the cycle?


It's an 11 year cycle.... You can watch it on:
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml

The most fascinating place about it is at:
http://www.spaceweather.com/
Today's sunspot number is ZERO! NO SUNSPOTS! Arrghh.
Sure glad there's Skype...(c;
Spaceweather can EASILY occupy an entire evening exploring.

Canada accurately tracks the Solar Radio flux on 2.8 Ghz:
http://www.drao-ofr.hia-iha.nrc-cnrc...sol_home.shtml

So, from their prediction graph, it looks like a nice peak in 2012. This
is perfect as that is the year my Socialist Security checks start
rollin' in and I can stop working for all my money and live off the kids
at Mickey D's flipping hamburgers.

Who knows. I might just put W4CSC back on the air...(c;


At night the only thing that's working for me on Winlink/Pactor is
80M.


80 and 160M act more like AM broadcast band than shortwaves. They're
pretty predictable as a good nighttime freq with groundwave only on the
sunny side of the planet. 40M up to 10M is what the solar cycle hits so
hard. I have seen 75M SSB totally unusable for nets a few times. Of
course, to become "net control" on an ARRL net, you must NOT own a proper
ANTENNA or BIG LINEAR AMPLIFIER so you don't sound like you're talking on
a wet string with 10 watts, no matter what the conditions...(c;

I used to be active on the SC SSB net on 3915 many years ago. One night
at net time you couldn't hear hardly anyone it was so bad. At that time,
I was running an old Heathkit HW-100 SSB transceiver (tubes, cheap) and a
home brew little amp I made out of some power company parts and a PAIR of
4-1000A tetrodes in a 7 ft tall old navy transmitter rack, about 4' wide.
Using "minimum power to establish communications" that night meant
running 6000 VDC at about 950ma on the little tubes. That's about a
kilowatt, right?....(c; The AM station down the street ran 200W on 1260
at night in a 3-tower directional array over my house. EJ, the chief
engineer and night DJ at the transmitter building used to call me and ask
if I would hold off transmitting until he read the antenna current meters
wildly moving around too far to fill in his log. He joked I had more
current in his towers than he did...hee hee...(c;

Those were fun days....no money, homebrew everything. I carried a melted
2' section of RG-8A/U coax into a ham club meeting and said they just
don't make coax like they used to....my little amp melted it...(c;

Larry
"POWER is our FRIEND!" (Robert Mitchell, AAA Communications, paging)

"You can tell when your ham station is tuned up, easily, by seeing how
dim the lights are in your neighbor's house." - (me)

  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,275
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

ray lunder wrote in
:

So what would a proper boat antenna look like? Examples, pictures,
name brands? Thanks as always.



Boats have no room for antennas that work good. So, there are two
compromises that work, "sort of".

One is an 18' whip coated in fiberglass to make it "yachtie", tuned from
the bottom against a seawater ground (we hope, or it's going nowhere):
http://www.boatersland.com/sha390.html
Above 15 Mhz, it's somewhat of an antenna. Below 15 Mhz, the further
down you go the worse it gets because it's just TOO SHORT! We put these
awful lossy "tuners" between the bottom of the whip and the radio to
match the impedance, at the cost of losing a lot of power. Being so
short at lower HF frequencies, its radiation pattern looks more like an
inflated hot air balloon, radiating mostly straight up...not out towards
the receivers over the horizon. These antennas at low frequencies have
almost no antenna CURRENT, which makes the required H field (the magnetic
radiation part of the radio wave). They have lots of voltage, E-field,
but E-field cannot exist without H-fields perpendicular to them so they
radiate poorly. You need BOTH.

Some of the "cure", about as much as you'll get, is to use a LONGER
antenna with the tuner doing less of the work. One comes with sailboats.
We call it the "backstay", a nice sloping piece of wire we can insulate
from ground on the bottom (series feeding it's called because the tuner
is installed in SERIES between ground and the bottom of the backstay,
because of the insulator. We insulate the top to keep the antenna
current from continuing up the backstay into the mast and going DOWN the
mast...which makes a wave that CANCELS the wave made by the backstay!
That's what the top insulator does. On "Lionheart", an Amel Sharki 41
ketch, this backstay is about 55' long, which is nicely resonant (where
the length becomes 1/4 wavelength) at 4.4 Mhz. It radiates very well
between 3-5 Mhz..maybe even wider. It also radiates very nicely as a 1/2
wavelength at 8.5 Mhz if you can get everyone away from the bottom of it
and you have a tuner that can tune very high impedances. At 8.5 Mhz, it
becomes a full dipole antenna with the tuner feeding the END of it, not
the middle as a normal dipole is fed at low impedance. There is
CONSIDERABLE voltage at 8.5 Mhz right at the bottom insulator. Keeping
hands off it is easy. Just key the mic, whistle in it and listen for the
cursing near the antenna...(c; Burn the captain and you walk the plank!
Both of these bands are very nicely around some great marine bands.

Unfortunately for sailboaters, they keep making masts, shrouds, topping
lifts, and other lines coming from the top of the masts to the bottom out
of METAL....which becomes passive elements, not directly driven, by your
backstay transmitter. The regenerated waves from any vertical metal,
wire rope, cables, shrouds, are always slightly out of phase and most
assuredly out of place with the main signal on the backstay. This causes
the reasonably nice fat donut you're looking for in a radiation pattern
into something that resembles the outside shape of an 8 leaf Shamrock
(Happy St Patty's Day, everyone!) with peaks in some directions and nulls
in others as the waves support and cancel each other around the azimuth.
These damnable metal things sticking up also absorb a lot of our radiated
signal, but are generally forgiven when the sailboat takes on diesel fuel
for these transgressions against our SSB signal. Again, it's all a
compromise.

http://www.tpub.com/content/et/14092/css/14092_35.htm
Oddly enough, those loud shore stations that haven't gone dead on marine
radio use a mast with shrouds all around it called a "conical monopole"
antenna which is VERY broadband over a wide variety of frequencies! Look
at the conical monopole on this webpage, and compare it to your
mast/shrouds/stays on the sailboat. Your boat is the TOP HALF of this
antenna! So, all is not lost. Too bad yours cannot be totally isolated
from ground and the whole rigging loaded as a giant antenna. On
Geoffrey's former boat, an Endeavour 35 sloop, I used to load the port
shroud through the ungrounded chainplate that lead right into the port
storage cabinet over the settee...and ran a ground wire down under the
cushions to the ground strap back to the engine I installed. This
arrangement SHUNT fed the mainmast, which wasn't grounded properly to
anything at its step. Shunt feeding has been used since the beginning of
radio. We hams have been shunt feeding out "masts" for decades:
http://www.qsl.net/w9rb/webdoc9.htm
Because the feed runs right along side the mast its feeding, there is no
changing phase angle the backstay creates running out from it. A series
capacitor is tuned to balance out the inductance of the shunt wire
running up, and insulated from the mast until it is attached at the top.
Broadcasters also use shunt fed, GROUNDED towers, because the expensive
AM transmitter is NOT in series with the 10 gigaamp lightning blast that
hits the tower and goes straight to the huge ground network that's
attached directly to the bottom of the tower, underground. You can see
which type of feed your local AM stations use on their tower antenna by
looking for the shunt wire running on insulators towards the top of the
tower. Series fed will have a huge insulator at the base and no shunt
wire. Shunt fed towers are firmly grounded at the base, not insulated.

I don't know why more HF-savvy boaters don't fool around with shunt
feeding their mainmast with a shunt wire insulated from the mast on the
port or starboard side under the shrouds. They work great and give you a
fantastic excuse to put a huge ground strap from the mast to ocean
grounding blocks under the hull to protect you from lightning hits.
http://nidxa.org/kb9cry_shunt_fed_tower.htm
http://www.fybush.com/sites/2007/site-070223.html
http://www.earthsignals.com/N6TZ/

Of course, some hams are MOST useful to HF boaters with their obsession
of antennas:
http://www.k7zsd.com/antennas.htm
Very nice, indeed. No restrictive covenants in HIS neighborhood!...(c;


Larry
--
Roll up to the long checkout line....
Yell, "ICE RAID!"
It's your turn to load the grocery belt...(c;
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
krj krj is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 160
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

Larry wrote:
ray lunder wrote in
:

So what would a proper boat antenna look like? Examples, pictures,
name brands? Thanks as always.



Boats have no room for antennas that work good. So, there are two
compromises that work, "sort of".

One is an 18' whip coated in fiberglass to make it "yachtie", tuned from
the bottom against a seawater ground (we hope, or it's going nowhere):
http://www.boatersland.com/sha390.html
Above 15 Mhz, it's somewhat of an antenna. Below 15 Mhz, the further
down you go the worse it gets because it's just TOO SHORT! We put these
awful lossy "tuners" between the bottom of the whip and the radio to
match the impedance, at the cost of losing a lot of power. Being so
short at lower HF frequencies, its radiation pattern looks more like an
inflated hot air balloon, radiating mostly straight up...not out towards
the receivers over the horizon. These antennas at low frequencies have
almost no antenna CURRENT, which makes the required H field (the magnetic
radiation part of the radio wave). They have lots of voltage, E-field,
but E-field cannot exist without H-fields perpendicular to them so they
radiate poorly. You need BOTH.

Some of the "cure", about as much as you'll get, is to use a LONGER
antenna with the tuner doing less of the work. One comes with sailboats.
We call it the "backstay", a nice sloping piece of wire we can insulate
from ground on the bottom (series feeding it's called because the tuner
is installed in SERIES between ground and the bottom of the backstay,
because of the insulator. We insulate the top to keep the antenna
current from continuing up the backstay into the mast and going DOWN the
mast...which makes a wave that CANCELS the wave made by the backstay!
That's what the top insulator does. On "Lionheart", an Amel Sharki 41
ketch, this backstay is about 55' long, which is nicely resonant (where
the length becomes 1/4 wavelength) at 4.4 Mhz. It radiates very well
between 3-5 Mhz..maybe even wider. It also radiates very nicely as a 1/2
wavelength at 8.5 Mhz if you can get everyone away from the bottom of it
and you have a tuner that can tune very high impedances. At 8.5 Mhz, it
becomes a full dipole antenna with the tuner feeding the END of it, not
the middle as a normal dipole is fed at low impedance. There is
CONSIDERABLE voltage at 8.5 Mhz right at the bottom insulator. Keeping
hands off it is easy. Just key the mic, whistle in it and listen for the
cursing near the antenna...(c; Burn the captain and you walk the plank!
Both of these bands are very nicely around some great marine bands.

Unfortunately for sailboaters, they keep making masts, shrouds, topping
lifts, and other lines coming from the top of the masts to the bottom out
of METAL....which becomes passive elements, not directly driven, by your
backstay transmitter. The regenerated waves from any vertical metal,
wire rope, cables, shrouds, are always slightly out of phase and most
assuredly out of place with the main signal on the backstay. This causes
the reasonably nice fat donut you're looking for in a radiation pattern
into something that resembles the outside shape of an 8 leaf Shamrock
(Happy St Patty's Day, everyone!) with peaks in some directions and nulls
in others as the waves support and cancel each other around the azimuth.
These damnable metal things sticking up also absorb a lot of our radiated
signal, but are generally forgiven when the sailboat takes on diesel fuel
for these transgressions against our SSB signal. Again, it's all a
compromise.

http://www.tpub.com/content/et/14092/css/14092_35.htm
Oddly enough, those loud shore stations that haven't gone dead on marine
radio use a mast with shrouds all around it called a "conical monopole"
antenna which is VERY broadband over a wide variety of frequencies! Look
at the conical monopole on this webpage, and compare it to your
mast/shrouds/stays on the sailboat. Your boat is the TOP HALF of this
antenna! So, all is not lost. Too bad yours cannot be totally isolated
from ground and the whole rigging loaded as a giant antenna. On
Geoffrey's former boat, an Endeavour 35 sloop, I used to load the port
shroud through the ungrounded chainplate that lead right into the port
storage cabinet over the settee...and ran a ground wire down under the
cushions to the ground strap back to the engine I installed. This
arrangement SHUNT fed the mainmast, which wasn't grounded properly to
anything at its step. Shunt feeding has been used since the beginning of
radio. We hams have been shunt feeding out "masts" for decades:
http://www.qsl.net/w9rb/webdoc9.htm
Because the feed runs right along side the mast its feeding, there is no
changing phase angle the backstay creates running out from it. A series
capacitor is tuned to balance out the inductance of the shunt wire
running up, and insulated from the mast until it is attached at the top.
Broadcasters also use shunt fed, GROUNDED towers, because the expensive
AM transmitter is NOT in series with the 10 gigaamp lightning blast that
hits the tower and goes straight to the huge ground network that's
attached directly to the bottom of the tower, underground. You can see
which type of feed your local AM stations use on their tower antenna by
looking for the shunt wire running on insulators towards the top of the
tower. Series fed will have a huge insulator at the base and no shunt
wire. Shunt fed towers are firmly grounded at the base, not insulated.

I don't know why more HF-savvy boaters don't fool around with shunt
feeding their mainmast with a shunt wire insulated from the mast on the
port or starboard side under the shrouds. They work great and give you a
fantastic excuse to put a huge ground strap from the mast to ocean
grounding blocks under the hull to protect you from lightning hits.
http://nidxa.org/kb9cry_shunt_fed_tower.htm
http://www.fybush.com/sites/2007/site-070223.html
http://www.earthsignals.com/N6TZ/

Of course, some hams are MOST useful to HF boaters with their obsession
of antennas:
http://www.k7zsd.com/antennas.htm
Very nice, indeed. No restrictive covenants in HIS neighborhood!...(c;


Larry

Larry,
I don't think the OP with an R-1000 has to worry about radiation
pattern, antenna current and tuners. He just needs a good long wire for
his receiver.
krj
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 41
Default Antenna for my Kenwood R-1000 receiver?

Larry wrote:

SNIP

Above 15 Mhz, it's somewhat of an antenna. Below 15 Mhz, the further
down you go the worse it gets because it's just TOO SHORT! We put these
awful lossy "tuners" between the bottom of the whip and the radio to
match the impedance, at the cost of losing a lot of power. Being so
short at lower HF frequencies, its radiation pattern looks more like an
inflated hot air balloon, radiating mostly straight up...not out towards
the receivers over the horizon.


Actually, vertical antennas (even very short ones) radiate almost
nothing directly overhead. Over seawater, vertical antennas radiate
better at low angles toward the far horizon than just about any
horizontal antenna.

These antennas at low frequencies have
almost no antenna CURRENT, which makes the required H field (the magnetic
radiation part of the radio wave). They have lots of voltage, E-field,
but E-field cannot exist without H-fields perpendicular to them so they
radiate poorly. You need BOTH.


If the short antenna is matched (i.e., you use a tuner) it will be
nearly as efficient as its longer counterpart. A short vertical antenna
has very HIGH current at its base. Any loss in efficiency is due almost
exclusively to the tuner when operated over seawater. Over land, ground
losses become a more significant factor in reducing efficiency.


Some of the "cure", about as much as you'll get, is to use a LONGER
antenna with the tuner doing less of the work.


Ironically (as is often the case with natu if bread and crackers are
exposed to the same environment, the bread becomes hard and the crackers
soft. Go figure.) at the higher frequencies, a longer vertical antenna
may actually radiate less toward the horizon (low angles). So an antenna
that is the "right" size for 4 MHz may not work as well on 15 MHz as a
shorter one! An antenna "too long" for a frequency will develop lobes
and nulls in the vertical plane which may be detrimental to your desired
propagation path. Yet another need for thoughtful compromise.

One comes with sailboats.
We call it the "backstay", a nice sloping piece of wire we can insulate
from ground on the bottom (series feeding it's called because the tuner
is installed in SERIES between ground and the bottom of the backstay,
because of the insulator. We insulate the top to keep the antenna
current from continuing up the backstay into the mast and going DOWN the
mast...which makes a wave that CANCELS the wave made by the backstay!


Well, if the mast is insulated at the base (some are) what you have is
something like an inverted "V" (end-fed) and there will be some
directionality, but cancellation is far too strong a term to describe
it. Even if the mast base is grounded, the small amount of
directionality would probably not be noticed in normal operation.

SNIP


On Geoffrey's former boat, an Endeavour 35 sloop, I used to load the port
shroud through the ungrounded chainplate that lead right into the port
storage cabinet over the settee...and ran a ground wire down under the
cushions to the ground strap back to the engine I installed. This
arrangement SHUNT fed the mainmast, which wasn't grounded properly to
anything at its step. Shunt feeding has been used since the beginning of
radio. We hams have been shunt feeding out "masts" for decades:
http://www.qsl.net/w9rb/webdoc9.htm


Shunt-feeding the mast (and back- and forestays) doesn't require the
base of the mast to be insulated. I've been shunt-feeding a grounded
mast on a 34' Tartan for years and never felt the need for a better
antenna. Since I use a manual tuner, it was impractical to feed the
bottom of the backstay with a tuner in the cabin. Because the lower ends
of the forestay and backstay are ungrounded, they act as a top hat,
making the mast appear longer (electrically) than it is. Since the stays
are not symmetrical, they doubtless provide some often needed horizontal
radiation.

I must say that on some frequencies, particularly the 40 meter band, the
feedpoint impedance of the system was wildly high. I ended up using
some additional outboard reactances to tame it. Everywhere else, tuning
was reasonable. An autotuner may have handled it OK. A key advantage is
that you can install an SSB in minutes without worrying about insulating
the backstay, etc.


Chuck



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SSB Antenna theory Gary Schafer Electronics 27 May 7th 04 04:35 PM
SSB antenna Roger Cruising 38 April 26th 04 02:17 AM
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry Gary Schafer Cruising 0 April 24th 04 11:51 PM
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry Gary Schafer Electronics 0 April 24th 04 11:51 PM
How to use a simple SWR meter and what it means to your VHF Larry W4CSC Electronics 74 November 25th 03 03:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017