| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is this the best you can offer?
==================== "Charlie Morgan" wrote in message ... On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:54:45 GMT, "NE Sailboat" wrote: Roger ,,, on and on you go. Always the same theme. You know everything and anybody who disagrees is not a sailor but a "putterer". "Nothing reveals the ignorance and lack of sea sense of armchair coastal putterers more than the posts that Barnes must have been a poor sailor simply because he lost his boat in the great southern ocean. There are few simple and sweeping statements you can make about the sea. About the closest is this, if you get your sailboat into conditions where large waves are breaking due to bottom effect you are in deep, deep ****, man. " Why don't you for once just admit you don't have any idea what happened to Ken Barnes and his boat. What we do know is this: he set out to sail around the world. He was in a very well constructed boat. Somehow, his well constructed boat got damaged, it did not sink. Mr Barnes decided to leave his well constructed boat and the boat is now sunk. These are the facts. Calling people "putterers" because they might have a different opinion from yours, cheapens the value of your conjecture. I fancy the word putterer. In fact, I like it. Until I am able to sail off for 6 months at a stretch, and experience all that the ocean has to offer on a small sailboat; being a putterer is fine with me. Captain "Putterer" .. and proud of it. I think "Captain Putz" suits you better. CWM |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sailboat project links - Mic | Cruising | |||
| ??? | General | |||
| WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | General | |||
| A tough question for Jeff and Shen44 | ASA | |||
| Let there be Nav. Light | ASA | |||