Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cal,
Besides your other calculations, I would think about the useful life of the diesel (or at least the time to a rebuild). An early rebuild will cost a lot more than the likely fuel savings based on engine choice. Modern turbocharged high-RPM lightweight diesels share little in common with traditional shipboard engines (except the fuel). Look at the following link to David Pascoe's Boat Survey site (this whole site is a pretty depressing commentary on boat quality these days - you might want to have a few drinks before visiting). I understand that some surveyors believe his opinions are overly alarmist and negative. http://www.yachtsurvey.com/GasNdiesel.htm One of his opinions is that you ideally want a diesel that has a CUI/HP (CubicInchDisplacement divided by HorsePower ) of less than 0.7. A ratio over 1.0 is not good. He agrees with some others posters that you can get dangerous carbon buildup if you don't run your diesel at high enough RPM's. It can lead to catastrophic engine failure (that sounds like fun!) Also, make sure you get to HEAR your engine at harbor speed and cruising speed before making a decision. I find some turbochargers sound like a dentist's drill - others have a less grating pitch. It also seems some engines are just plain quieter - although it's hard to compensate for the quality of the engine room insulation. Carl |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Google proves MacGregor 26 is flimsy | ASA | |||
Marine algae derived enzymes as diesel catalysts.......... | General | |||
The Diesel Engine | General | |||
Why Ficht failed no1 | General | |||
Habbi's gearcase full of water | General |