Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peggie Hall writes:
On a powerboat, no....'cuz powerboats don't heel. But on a sailboat, if the inlet fitting on the tank is toward the hull instead of toward the centerline of the boat, a loop--though not necessarily a vented loop--is a good idea to prevent tank contents from running back toward the toilet when you're heeled. It's not necessary if the inlet and vent fittings are toward the centerline because waste in the tank runs to the side away from the fitting on one tack, the hoses run uphill on the other tack. Worth remembering when you spec out an installation. -- Peggie Peggie, thanks for all the great work you are doing! I read may of your postings in different forums and benefitted a lot from your knowledge in the installation of my holding tank. However, this one I don't understand. When I read it first I thought 'shoot, my fittings are on the wrong side' since they are towards the hull. But then I thought again and I don't see what's wrong about it. Why is holding tank contents more likely to run out of the tank with the fittings towards the hull than towards the centerline? Let's say the fittings are on the hull side on the port side (as in my case). Then, at a certain heel angle to port, the level of liquids inside the tank will reach the fitting and overflow may occur (yuck). But if the fittings were towards the centerline, why wouldn't the same occur when the boat heels by exactly the same angle to starboard?? --Ernst Columbia 32 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Why is holding tank contents more likely to run out of the tank with the fittings towards the hull than towards the centerline? Let's say the fittings are on the hull side on the port side (as in my case). Then, at a certain heel angle to port, the level of liquids inside the tank will reach the fitting and overflow may occur (yuck). Yep...because stuff runs downhill...So when you're heeled to port, if fittings are on the port side of the tank, contents can spill out the vent or run back toward a head on the port side. But if the tank fittings are toward the centerline, contents will run to the port side of the tank when you're heeled to port, but have no place to go because the lines are on the other side of the tank. But if the fittings were towards the centerline, why wouldn't the same occur when the boat heels by exactly the same angle to starboard?? No, because stuff DOESN'T run UPhill...your head and vent fitting are still on the port side...right? So when you're heeled to starboard, it's an uphill run from the centerline to a head and vent thru-hull on the port side of the boat. Liquid in a tank is always gonna run toward the low side of the boat...so it's always gonna run away from any fitting that's toward the centerline on one tack... any hoses running across the tank from the side toward the centerline are gonna be running uphill on the other tack. If the tank is set on the centerline--for instance, a bow-shaped tank under the v-berth--the fittings should ideally be on the top and in the center of the tank. But even if they're on the end, tank contents will run to one side or the other, never toward the hoses, when you're heeled...the boat would have to be stood on its stern to create a downhill run in either direction. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Peggie Hall writes: But if the fittings were towards the centerline, why wouldn't the same occur when the boat heels by exactly the same angle to starboard?? No, because stuff DOESN'T run UPhill...your head and vent fitting are still on the port side...right? So when you're heeled to starboard, it's an uphill run from the centerline to a head and vent thru-hull on the port side of the boat. Liquid in a tank is always gonna run toward the low side of the boat...so it's always gonna run away from any fitting that's toward the centerline on one tack... any hoses running across the tank from the side toward the centerline are gonna be running uphill on the other tack. OK, maybe I understand it now. Do you propose to have the outlet fitting towards the centerline and the hose then OVER the tank? I guess that would work, then the 'stuff' would have to run uphill to get out of the tank. That would have been hard to achieve in my situation, the tank is pretty much shoehorned in, to give max. volume. I guess I'll have to pay attention to not overfilling the tank when on starboard tack... I have a Lavac toilet (with which I am so far extremely happy). Does this make me more or less vulnerable to this kind of problem? Although the outlet valve of the Henderson pump seemed pretty sturdy, it is my only line of defence, right? Once liquid gets through the pump, it can flow right out of the toilet. --Ernst |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Peggie Hall writes: Runback toward the toilet can be solved with a loop in the line. Depending on how much you heel, preventing waste from overflowing out the vent can be harder to do. A loop would be difficult to install. The tank is installed relatively high, with most of it over the waterline. Two reasons for that: one because it fits nicely where it is (under the sink in the head), and the second because it allows me to drain the tank by gravity: There is a second outlet at the bottom which is connected to the original thruhull. Of course, this is padlocked to make it legal within 3 miles of the coast. If I wanted to install a loop, it would either stick right into the room over the sink, or I would have to butcher a nice nearby teak cabinet really badly. Neither seems appealing. (OK, the idea of tank contents seepage isn't exactly appealing, either...) I have a Lavac toilet (with which I am so far extremely happy). Does this make me more or less vulnerable to this kind of problem? That depends on where the pump is mounted, but it should make you a bit less vulnerable in any case. Pump is very close to the tank, at the level of about the top of it. But not to waste overflowing out the vent. That can clean to a blocked vent line, so it's important that you remember to backflush the vent every time you pumpout AND every time you wash the boat. Good ideas, but in THAT case I actually did follow your advice: the vent fittings (yes, I DO have two of them, and they are led to the bow, port and starboard) are sitting on the top of the tank, in the centerline. So I should be safe with regard to that. Although the outlet valve of the Henderson pump seemed pretty sturdy, it is my only line of defence, right? Once liquid gets through the pump, it can flow right out of the toilet. INTO the toilet. A good reason to pay close attention to any needed maintenance. Well, that was kind of my point: If it can flow INTO the Lavac toilet, it can flow OUT of it, right? (the tank is higher than the toilet) There is no valve or anything in a Lavac that would hold it back. And the only maintenance I can think of is to make sure the rubber parts in the Henderson pump are OK, right? This lack of necessary maintenance/rebuilding was one of the reasons I picked the Lavac. --Ernst |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, that was kind of my point: If it can flow INTO the Lavac toilet,
it can flow OUT of it, right? Well...ok. If more than the bowl can hold flows in, it'll flow out of the bowl. ![]() And the only maintenance I can think of is to make sure the rubber parts in the Henderson pump are OK, right? Yep. This lack of necessary maintenance/rebuilding was one of the reasons I picked the Lavac. I always have to grin when people tell me the Lavac needs no maintenance, that only the pump requires occasional--about every 5 years or so--rebuilding. I don't know of any other toilet BOWLS that require any maintenance either...MAYBE a new seat/lid every 10 years or so--which is usually less often than the Lavac needs a new seal. Nor does any decent quality toilet pump require rebuilding any more often than about once every 5 years or so as long as it's kept lubricated. But there's something about putting the pump 2-5' from the bowl instead of right next to it on the same base that changes everything in people's minds. I'm not knocking the Lavac...it's an outstanding toilet--though not necessarily the right toilet for everyone. But I can't help wondering if it would have even a fraction of the appeal it has, if it worked exactly the same way, but the pump and bowl were side-by-side on a single base. ![]() -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Peggie Hall writes: This lack of necessary maintenance/rebuilding was one of the reasons I picked the Lavac. I always have to grin when people tell me the Lavac needs no maintenance, that only the pump requires occasional--about every 5 years or so--rebuilding. I don't know of any other toilet BOWLS that require any maintenance either...MAYBE a new seat/lid every 10 years or so--which is usually less often than the Lavac needs a new seal. Nor does any decent quality toilet pump require rebuilding any more often than about once every 5 years or so as long as it's kept lubricated. But there's something about putting the pump 2-5' from the bowl instead of right next to it on the same base that changes everything in people's minds. I'm not knocking the Lavac...it's an outstanding toilet--though not necessarily the right toilet for everyone. But I can't help wondering if it would have even a fraction of the appeal it has, if it worked exactly the same way, but the pump and bowl were side-by-side on a single base. ![]() -- Peggie You are absolutely right! I never thought of that but it is true, psychologically it makes a difference. Or, as they say: It is all in the head ![]() --Ernst |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Peggie Hall writes: This lack of necessary maintenance/rebuilding was one of the reasons I picked the Lavac. I always have to grin when people tell me the Lavac needs no maintenance, that only the pump requires occasional--about every 5 years or so--rebuilding. I don't know of any other toilet BOWLS that require any maintenance either...MAYBE a new seat/lid every 10 years or so--which is usually less often than the Lavac needs a new seal. Nor does any decent quality toilet pump require rebuilding any more often than about once every 5 years or so as long as it's kept lubricated. But there's something about putting the pump 2-5' from the bowl instead of right next to it on the same base that changes everything in people's minds. I'm not knocking the Lavac...it's an outstanding toilet--though not necessarily the right toilet for everyone. But I can't help wondering if it would have even a fraction of the appeal it has, if it worked exactly the same way, but the pump and bowl were side-by-side on a single base. ![]() -- Peggie You are absolutely right! I never thought of that but it is true, psychologically it makes a difference. Or, as they say: It is all in the head ![]() --Ernst |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, that was kind of my point: If it can flow INTO the Lavac toilet,
it can flow OUT of it, right? Well...ok. If more than the bowl can hold flows in, it'll flow out of the bowl. ![]() And the only maintenance I can think of is to make sure the rubber parts in the Henderson pump are OK, right? Yep. This lack of necessary maintenance/rebuilding was one of the reasons I picked the Lavac. I always have to grin when people tell me the Lavac needs no maintenance, that only the pump requires occasional--about every 5 years or so--rebuilding. I don't know of any other toilet BOWLS that require any maintenance either...MAYBE a new seat/lid every 10 years or so--which is usually less often than the Lavac needs a new seal. Nor does any decent quality toilet pump require rebuilding any more often than about once every 5 years or so as long as it's kept lubricated. But there's something about putting the pump 2-5' from the bowl instead of right next to it on the same base that changes everything in people's minds. I'm not knocking the Lavac...it's an outstanding toilet--though not necessarily the right toilet for everyone. But I can't help wondering if it would have even a fraction of the appeal it has, if it worked exactly the same way, but the pump and bowl were side-by-side on a single base. ![]() -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Peggie Hall writes: Runback toward the toilet can be solved with a loop in the line. Depending on how much you heel, preventing waste from overflowing out the vent can be harder to do. A loop would be difficult to install. The tank is installed relatively high, with most of it over the waterline. Two reasons for that: one because it fits nicely where it is (under the sink in the head), and the second because it allows me to drain the tank by gravity: There is a second outlet at the bottom which is connected to the original thruhull. Of course, this is padlocked to make it legal within 3 miles of the coast. If I wanted to install a loop, it would either stick right into the room over the sink, or I would have to butcher a nice nearby teak cabinet really badly. Neither seems appealing. (OK, the idea of tank contents seepage isn't exactly appealing, either...) I have a Lavac toilet (with which I am so far extremely happy). Does this make me more or less vulnerable to this kind of problem? That depends on where the pump is mounted, but it should make you a bit less vulnerable in any case. Pump is very close to the tank, at the level of about the top of it. But not to waste overflowing out the vent. That can clean to a blocked vent line, so it's important that you remember to backflush the vent every time you pumpout AND every time you wash the boat. Good ideas, but in THAT case I actually did follow your advice: the vent fittings (yes, I DO have two of them, and they are led to the bow, port and starboard) are sitting on the top of the tank, in the centerline. So I should be safe with regard to that. Although the outlet valve of the Henderson pump seemed pretty sturdy, it is my only line of defence, right? Once liquid gets through the pump, it can flow right out of the toilet. INTO the toilet. A good reason to pay close attention to any needed maintenance. Well, that was kind of my point: If it can flow INTO the Lavac toilet, it can flow OUT of it, right? (the tank is higher than the toilet) There is no valve or anything in a Lavac that would hold it back. And the only maintenance I can think of is to make sure the rubber parts in the Henderson pump are OK, right? This lack of necessary maintenance/rebuilding was one of the reasons I picked the Lavac. --Ernst |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
Friday Ethics Question | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | Boat Building |