| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gordon wrote:
Talking to a very knowledgeable surveyor here, without looking at the particular boat, says that Irwins were roomy and make great liveaboards, but were not to be trusted offshore. They were a cheaply made boat to fit a particular market and not for the serious cruiser. That seems to fit what many of you have said. Thanks all Gordon Did the surveyor say why Irwins "were not to be trusted offshore"? Are they prone to breaking up and sinking, thru hulls fall out, mast break off? What makes them dangerous offshore? Just like to know his reasons. krj |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
The story on this page might shed some light.
http://pages.sssnet.com/go2erie/wind.htm Scroll down to the Irwin Citation -- Roger Long "krj" wrote Did the surveyor say why Irwins "were not to be trusted offshore"? Are they prone to breaking up and sinking, thru hulls fall out, mast break off? What makes them dangerous offshore? Just like to know his reasons. krj |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roger Long wrote:
The story on this page might shed some light. http://pages.sssnet.com/go2erie/wind.htm Scroll down to the Irwin Citation The story talks about the side of the hull flexing while beating into 4-5' chop. I read a similar story about the Irwin 53 that was written by a delivery skipper. Bottom line, they are not blue water boats. The same can be (and is) said about a lot of other manufacturers products as well. Don W. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:58:03 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: The story on this page might shed some light. http://pages.sssnet.com/go2erie/wind.htm Scroll down to the Irwin Citation That's the Citation, which was a very lightweight boat compared to the 37 or 42. A very different boat. Steve |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Serious flexing!
G "krj" wrote in message . .. Gordon wrote: Talking to a very knowledgeable surveyor here, without looking at the particular boat, says that Irwins were roomy and make great liveaboards, but were not to be trusted offshore. They were a cheaply made boat to fit a particular market and not for the serious cruiser. That seems to fit what many of you have said. Thanks all Gordon Did the surveyor say why Irwins "were not to be trusted offshore"? Are they prone to breaking up and sinking, thru hulls fall out, mast break off? What makes them dangerous offshore? Just like to know his reasons. krj |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Good info | Boat Building | |||
| Good info | Cruising | |||
| FS: Irwin 37 center cockpit in NY-DEAL! | Marketplace | |||
| Heritage Center Cockpit Ketch - Help | Cruising | |||
| FS: 41'0 Gulfstar Offshore Center Cockpit Sloop in Guatemala | Marketplace | |||