Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Vessel detectors
I never said that you are not to have a proper lookout. Under the law you
are to use all means available to avoid a collision. By having RADAR and not using it you're at fault. Even if the another vessel collides with your boat, you will be fault for not operating your RADAR. To avoid a collision. Jack "Chuck Bollinger" wrote in message ... Jack Rye wrote: Sea or admiralty law states if your boat is equipped with radar and your not using it when you have an accident your at 50%fault. This includes being struck by other vessels. Jack's two cents I am surprised by the above. Can you provide some documentation? I had thought it was the other way around: Use of a radar did not obviate the requirement for a proper lookout. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Norwegian cargo vessel hitting ------ | Boat Building | |||
ship anchor hitting smaller vessel | General | |||
COLREGS - The final word on pecking order in restricted visibility. | General | |||
Boat US buys Vessel Assist | General | |||
vessel assist or Sea Tow? | General |