Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The angle of incidence of sunlight on a stationary flat panel would be a
sinusoidal curve between sunrise and sunset but I don't think the power output would quite follow the Rule of 12ths. For one thing the amount of atmosphere the light has to pass through would squeeze the peak output towards the center where both the filtering and the angle of incidence would be least. If the panel were mounted so it tracks the sun the output curve would be flatter. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "Geoff Schultz" wrote in message .. . Does the hours of sunlight follow the rule of 12ths? I suspect that it does, but I'm too busy to figure it out by myself and I thought that someone might now the answer off the top of their head. -- Geoff |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not thinking about solar panels. I was just watching the daylight
disappear while thinking having to move BlueJacket from the Chesapeake to Ft. Lauderdale at the end of the month. I was thinking about how quickly we're loosing daylight and wondered if rate of change was the same as tidal change and thus the rule of 12ths. I couldn't see why not. -- Geoff "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in news:fHsVg.23885$rg1.377@dukeread01: The angle of incidence of sunlight on a stationary flat panel would be a sinusoidal curve between sunrise and sunset but I don't think the power output would quite follow the Rule of 12ths. For one thing the amount of atmosphere the light has to pass through would squeeze the peak output towards the center where both the filtering and the angle of incidence would be least. If the panel were mounted so it tracks the sun the output curve would be flatter. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:44:21 -0500, Geoff Schultz
wrote: I was thinking about how quickly we're loosing daylight and wondered if rate of change was the same as tidal change and thus the rule of 12ths. I couldn't see why not. The daily rate of change is highest at the spring and fall equinox since that is where the sine curve has the steepest slope (when it passes through zero). Short days are definitely an issue when you bring a boat south in the fall but it gets somewat better as you get further along towards lower latitudes. I assume you are comfortable running at night with all the cruising you have done. If so, wait for a good weather window and head offshore for a few days at a time. That's what we did last year and it worked out well. As long as we are not in the ICW, or coming into strange harbors, running at night is not a problem. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In that case you will probably get pretty close. The Rule of 12ths is
actually a way to estimate the slope of a sine wave and except for a few minor variations the seasonal variation in day length is sinusoidal. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "Geoff Schultz" wrote in message .. . I'm not thinking about solar panels. I was just watching the daylight disappear while thinking having to move BlueJacket from the Chesapeake to Ft. Lauderdale at the end of the month. I was thinking about how quickly we're loosing daylight and wondered if rate of change was the same as tidal change and thus the rule of 12ths. I couldn't see why not. -- Geoff "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in news:fHsVg.23885$rg1.377@dukeread01: The angle of incidence of sunlight on a stationary flat panel would be a sinusoidal curve between sunrise and sunset but I don't think the power output would quite follow the Rule of 12ths. For one thing the amount of atmosphere the light has to pass through would squeeze the peak output towards the center where both the filtering and the angle of incidence would be least. If the panel were mounted so it tracks the sun the output curve would be flatter. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:14:25 -0400, "Glenn Ashmore"
wrote: In that case you will probably get pretty close. The Rule of 12ths is actually a way to estimate the slope of a sine wave and except for a few minor variations the seasonal variation in day length is sinusoidal. -- Glenn Ashmore Glenn, what's the latest estimate for splashing noises coming from your direction? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Glenn, what's the latest estimate for splashing noises coming from
your direction? I keep saying that if I can keep my ass in gear I can be in the water in the Spring. The problem is keeping it in gear. :-) I am down to the picky and painful parts now. Laying the teak on the side decks, setting plumbing fixtures, final fairing and painting the topsides and a whole bunch of interior sanding and varnishing. The big plus is that everything but the electronics, spars, rigging and sails is on hand and paid for so no more time wasted waiting for the boat kitty to refill. :-) You know you are getting close when you go to the Annapolis show and don't look at the boats. Spent all my time in the tents looking at parts and discovered a downside to gradually acquiring things as bargains are presented. I picked up 350' of NE Ropes 3 strand last year and they just introduced a new nylon plait anchor rode with a soft hand that stacks in about half the space of 3 strand. I will be setting my two Atlantes heads this weekend and Raritan has a new model that is simpler and uses less amps. Fortunately I have not bought any electronics yet. There are some amazing things happening in autopilots and nav systems. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:20:13 -0400, "Glenn Ashmore"
wrote: The big plus is that everything but the electronics, spars, rigging and sails is on hand and paid for so no more time wasted waiting for the boat kitty to refill. :-) Don't under estimate the cost of spars, rigging and sails. I once rerigged a Cal-34 from the deck up, and it was a big number even 20 years ago. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:20:13 -0400, "Glenn Ashmore"
wrote: Glenn, what's the latest estimate for splashing noises coming from your direction? .... The big plus is that everything but the electronics, spars, rigging and sails is on hand and paid for so no more time wasted waiting for the boat kitty to refill. :-) I knew you had to be joking with that throw-away line: ONLY the spars, sails, rigging, electronics? Yowza! Brian Whatcott Altus OK |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The strategy has always been to get the topsides, deck and interior all nice
and shiny looking and THEN invite the bank out for a cockpit party. :-) -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "Brian Whatcott" wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:20:13 -0400, "Glenn Ashmore" wrote: Glenn, what's the latest estimate for splashing noises coming from your direction? .... The big plus is that everything but the electronics, spars, rigging and sails is on hand and paid for so no more time wasted waiting for the boat kitty to refill. :-) I knew you had to be joking with that throw-away line: ONLY the spars, sails, rigging, electronics? Yowza! Brian Whatcott Altus OK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|