Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does the hours of sunlight follow the rule of 12ths? I suspect that it
does, but I'm too busy to figure it out by myself and I thought that someone might now the answer off the top of their head. -- Geoff |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 05:30:57 -0500, Geoff Schultz
wrote: Does the hours of sunlight follow the rule of 12ths? I suspect that it does, but I'm too busy to figure it out by myself and I thought that someone might now the answer off the top of their head. My first reaction is no, but perhaps I'm missing your intended meaning. The "Rule of 12ths" is commonly used to estimate tide height. How does that relate to hours of sunlight? Hours of sunlight depends on both latitude and time of year, largest seasonal variation is at the poles, smallest variation near the equator. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote in
: On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 05:30:57 -0500, Geoff Schultz wrote: Does the hours of sunlight follow the rule of 12ths? I suspect that it does, but I'm too busy to figure it out by myself and I thought that someone might now the answer off the top of their head. My first reaction is no, but perhaps I'm missing your intended meaning. The "Rule of 12ths" is commonly used to estimate tide height. How does that relate to hours of sunlight? Hours of sunlight depends on both latitude and time of year, largest seasonal variation is at the poles, smallest variation near the equator. I just ran a spread sheet looking at the number of hours of sunlight per month. If I apply the rule of 12ths to calculate the hours of sunlight, I come up with a result that's within 5% of the actual result, well within my range of error. The rule of 12ths deals with rate of change over half of a 6 hour tidal cycle and I assumed that it would also apply to daylight hours in a 6 month cycle. -- Geoff |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The angle of incidence of sunlight on a stationary flat panel would be a
sinusoidal curve between sunrise and sunset but I don't think the power output would quite follow the Rule of 12ths. For one thing the amount of atmosphere the light has to pass through would squeeze the peak output towards the center where both the filtering and the angle of incidence would be least. If the panel were mounted so it tracks the sun the output curve would be flatter. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "Geoff Schultz" wrote in message .. . Does the hours of sunlight follow the rule of 12ths? I suspect that it does, but I'm too busy to figure it out by myself and I thought that someone might now the answer off the top of their head. -- Geoff |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not thinking about solar panels. I was just watching the daylight
disappear while thinking having to move BlueJacket from the Chesapeake to Ft. Lauderdale at the end of the month. I was thinking about how quickly we're loosing daylight and wondered if rate of change was the same as tidal change and thus the rule of 12ths. I couldn't see why not. -- Geoff "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in news:fHsVg.23885$rg1.377@dukeread01: The angle of incidence of sunlight on a stationary flat panel would be a sinusoidal curve between sunrise and sunset but I don't think the power output would quite follow the Rule of 12ths. For one thing the amount of atmosphere the light has to pass through would squeeze the peak output towards the center where both the filtering and the angle of incidence would be least. If the panel were mounted so it tracks the sun the output curve would be flatter. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:44:21 -0500, Geoff Schultz
wrote: I was thinking about how quickly we're loosing daylight and wondered if rate of change was the same as tidal change and thus the rule of 12ths. I couldn't see why not. The daily rate of change is highest at the spring and fall equinox since that is where the sine curve has the steepest slope (when it passes through zero). Short days are definitely an issue when you bring a boat south in the fall but it gets somewat better as you get further along towards lower latitudes. I assume you are comfortable running at night with all the cruising you have done. If so, wait for a good weather window and head offshore for a few days at a time. That's what we did last year and it worked out well. As long as we are not in the ICW, or coming into strange harbors, running at night is not a problem. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In that case you will probably get pretty close. The Rule of 12ths is
actually a way to estimate the slope of a sine wave and except for a few minor variations the seasonal variation in day length is sinusoidal. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "Geoff Schultz" wrote in message .. . I'm not thinking about solar panels. I was just watching the daylight disappear while thinking having to move BlueJacket from the Chesapeake to Ft. Lauderdale at the end of the month. I was thinking about how quickly we're loosing daylight and wondered if rate of change was the same as tidal change and thus the rule of 12ths. I couldn't see why not. -- Geoff "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in news:fHsVg.23885$rg1.377@dukeread01: The angle of incidence of sunlight on a stationary flat panel would be a sinusoidal curve between sunrise and sunset but I don't think the power output would quite follow the Rule of 12ths. For one thing the amount of atmosphere the light has to pass through would squeeze the peak output towards the center where both the filtering and the angle of incidence would be least. If the panel were mounted so it tracks the sun the output curve would be flatter. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:14:25 -0400, "Glenn Ashmore"
wrote: In that case you will probably get pretty close. The Rule of 12ths is actually a way to estimate the slope of a sine wave and except for a few minor variations the seasonal variation in day length is sinusoidal. -- Glenn Ashmore Glenn, what's the latest estimate for splashing noises coming from your direction? |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Glenn, what's the latest estimate for splashing noises coming from
your direction? I keep saying that if I can keep my ass in gear I can be in the water in the Spring. The problem is keeping it in gear. :-) I am down to the picky and painful parts now. Laying the teak on the side decks, setting plumbing fixtures, final fairing and painting the topsides and a whole bunch of interior sanding and varnishing. The big plus is that everything but the electronics, spars, rigging and sails is on hand and paid for so no more time wasted waiting for the boat kitty to refill. :-) You know you are getting close when you go to the Annapolis show and don't look at the boats. Spent all my time in the tents looking at parts and discovered a downside to gradually acquiring things as bargains are presented. I picked up 350' of NE Ropes 3 strand last year and they just introduced a new nylon plait anchor rode with a soft hand that stacks in about half the space of 3 strand. I will be setting my two Atlantes heads this weekend and Raritan has a new model that is simpler and uses less amps. Fortunately I have not bought any electronics yet. There are some amazing things happening in autopilots and nav systems. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 05:30:57 -0500, Geoff Schultz
wrote: Does the hours of sunlight follow the rule of 12ths? I suspect that it does, but I'm too busy to figure it out by myself and I thought that someone might now the answer off the top of their head. -- Geoff Hi Geoff, I am not quite sure what you are wanting but this may be of help. It is in a way similar to the estimation provided by the rule of 12ths. When you wish to roughly ascertain the remaining hours of daylight at sea, hold your hand at arm's length towards the setting sun and bend it so that your fingers and palm are at 90 degrees to your arm with your fingers tightly together side by side and are horizontal. Bring your hand down beneath the sun so that the bottom of your little finger lies along and just touches the horizon. The distance in finger widths between the horizon and the bottom of the sun disc is the number of 15 minutes periods before sunset. e.g. four fingers is one hour of daylight left. You can easily make a rough estimate of the time until sunset this way. I know that one could look up tables or even look up the page in the GPS that shows sunset at destination, but in mid passage or when making landfall, it works well enough for me and is surpisingly accurate. One could possibly get into arguments about degrees from the equator but I don't care to go down that route. I hope that my explanation is easy to comprehend. cheers Peter Hendra N.Z. yacht Herodotus |