Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() GBM wrote: John, Your example perhaps explains the reason for my question. You are right - If I go to a windlass that draws 80 - 90A, I WOULD need large cables. I'm quite sure I've never drawn close to this current with my windlass. You should understand that you will need the same number of watts of power to hoist your anchor at a given speed- no matter which windlass you choose. A larger capacity windlass 'just lazing along' will draw the same current as (probably less than) a smaller one which is near stalling. (Out of interest, how did you conclude that your advisor was right about the 1/0 wire?) A trip on another boat with undersized wiring and problems, and no problems with my installation. Positive comments on surveys. Great rep of advisor. Getting back to windlass choice: Why choose a windlass that draws such a high current on a 30-32 ft boat? There are windlasses available that use epicyclic (planetary) gears that are much more efficient. I wanted a vertical axis windlass with rope/chain gypsy and rope capstan above. There were limited choices. Current draw is not an issue. I didn't want a flimsy unit from an unknown maker. There's not a big difference in 'efficiency' between different motor designs for windlasses. Compare speed of hoist and load (in N)- you will need the same number of watts with any unit. There's no 'free lunch'. You are trading speed of hoist, force and power consumption. For example, a Quick Genius (similar specs to Concept 1) draws just 40A at working load - Quick recommends 6AWG wire for a 50-60ft return trip. See: http://www.1stopmarineshop.com/Quick%20Windlass.html . The Lofrans Dorado has similar lower current draw. http://www.lofrans.it/english/intro.html There are vertical units that are also efficient. Is there a downside to using one of the higher efficiency units? I think one of my main concerns has been answered - If I draw 80A for 5-10 min, Well, one of the 'high efficiency' units may take 5-10 min to hoist the anchor and rode, but I've never needed more than a couple of minutes to pull in even 300 ft of rode and anchor. A couple of ammeters in your system will open your eyes to the actual situation- put one in the charging line and another on the load side. You will be amazed how little current is produced by your alternator (without an external over-ride regulator). A couple of reading lights left on for the evening will pull more energy from your battery bank than hoisting your anchor with your new windlass. So many choices, so little cash! Cheers John |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John" wrote Well, one of the 'high efficiency' units may take 5-10 min to hoist the anchor and rode, but I've never needed more than a couple of minutes to pull in even 300 ft of rode and anchor. John - If you compare specs and read the tests/reviews, you will find that some windlasses do consume less power for the same working load and speed. Here is some data from the manufacturer's literature comparing the Lewmar Concept 1 with a Quick Genius 600 (admittedly quite different windlasses): Working load:- Quick: 85Kg Lewmar 45Kg (seems low?) Maximum pull:- Quick:680Kg Lewmar 650Kg Speed at working load:- Quick: 44ft/min @ 85kg Lewmar: 46ft/min @ 45kg Current draw at working load: Quick: 40A Lewmar: 80A This is not a Lewmar vs Quick thing. Even within the same company, there are efficiency differences. I have looked at many windlasses that would suit my boat (using 3X ground tackle weight) and found large discepancies in power and current usage. The Quick reps confirmed this and explained that it was due to lower losses in the gearing of some newer designs - Power required can be 30-50% less for the same load, even if speed is comparable. Everyone has their own take on these things, but mine is to put in the most efficient unit that will do the job. This is partly driven by limited engine HP which limits alternator size, which limits battery bank capacity. It is also driven by keeping weight and dollars invested to a minimum ![]() GBM A couple of ammeters in your system will open your eyes to the actual situation- put one in the charging line and another on the load side. You will be amazed how little current is produced by your alternator (without an external over-ride regulator). A couple of reading lights left on for the evening will pull more energy from your battery bank than hoisting your anchor with your new windlass. So many choices, so little cash! Cheers John |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Installaing a windlass | Cruising | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
SSB Antenna theory | Electronics | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Cruising | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Electronics |