Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ryk
wrote: On Mon, 22 May 2006 02:02:50 +0100, in message Peter Wiley wrote: In article , Ryk wrote: Oh, and I agree with your other correspondent that pulling props is a black art. I managed to deform the end of a shaft with a puller in the process of tackling a prop change. Heat and well applied impact loads seem to be important. I had no big problem removing the fixed prop with about a 2 1/2 inch shaft contact, but removing the Gori folder with more like 4 inches of contact was beyond me. Why? Was it a very slow taper, or a straight shaft? With a long slow taper I can see a wonderful wedging action happening when the retainint nut is torqued up tight. Standard taper in both cases. Both props had been installed for a *long* time. My guess is that it was just a matter of surface area. Likely you're right but if it was a std taper either the retaining nut thread must have been a smaller dia or the shaft dia must have been a lot greater. If it was the same shaft I don't see mechanically how it's possible to keep the same taper as before. It would be a good idea in this sort of situation to relieve the central portion of the prop hub half a millimeter or so, to reduce the metal to metal contact area. Easy to do while it's set up for boring the taper. PDW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Delamination, Dodger snaps, and boat Purchase | Cruising | |||
ideas for a dodger or small cuddy... | General | |||
ideas for a dodger or small cuddy... | General | |||
ideas for a dodger or small cuddy... | General | |||
How to build a Hard Bimini & Dodger? | Cruising |