Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff" wrote in message news ![]() I have trouble following your logic, and where did you get those numbers??? here's a good source: http://www.uscgboating.org/statistic...dent_stats.htm same source, excepting a correction in sailboat numbers for those states which don't require sailboats and auxiliary sailboats to be registers. *However* serious finger trouble on my part and lack of double checking changed 4% into 40%! ------------------------------------------- Boats (12,000,000 - of which sail and Aux sail 40%) 12 million boats are registered, but only about 140,000 see below, or 1.2% are auxiliary sail, with slightly over have being outboards. I don't know how you could think 40% of all boats are sail! Agreed. I was looking in 2002 for comparable figures in aviation and vehicles as well. In 2002 the CG recorded 216,657 auxiliary sailboats and 123,772 sail boats (340,429 - 2.5% of the total fleet) with possibly a further 50,000 from states which did not require registration of these vessels, but required power only registration. I know - 3%. Good thing you were there to check! Deaths pa 800 (5 times as many injuries) The death rate has dropped about to 700 or less for 4 of the last 5 years, there has been a significant trend towards safety in recent years. Agreed. The year I was looking at 5,705 accidents, 4,062 injuries and 750 fatalities. 0.25 per 100,000 of population Assuming you've 300,000,000 people living in US 7 per 100,000 boats 5.77 to be exact. I was doing back of the envelope comparisons between different transport modes, and 20% error either way made no difference to the argument. 2.8 per 10,000,000 hours (heroic assumption; 250hrs per boat pa) This has to be hugely overstated, but what's the point? However: sailboats are only 1% of deaths. Sorry, 1.5%, but with only 11 deaths the percentage assumption is weak. Sailboat related deaths occur in almost exactly the same proportion as their numbers in the registered fleet. They probably are statistically safer if you could include all of the unregistered human powered vehicles (which also includes some sailboats) since canoes and kayaks are a major source of fatalities. Broadly agreed. We had been selecting different elements of the stats for different purposes, and on my game sailboats plus auxiliary sailboats had roughly half the death rate (hangs head in shame about bogus 40%). Very much agree with all your other (snipped) comments. It's good to see a rational discussion with bad assumptions/statements being corrected like this. The point of my original quotation of rates per 100,000 etc was to show the following(now corrected!) ------------------------------------- Cars. (number not known by me) 38,000 deaths pa, (10 times as many injuries). 15 per 100,000 population (UK, about 7/100,000) 1.5 per 100,000,000 miles 4.5 per 10,000,000 hours Source: http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/ -------------------------------------- Boats (12,000,000) Deaths pa 750 (5 times as many injuries), 5000 accidents 0.25 deaths per 100,000 of population 6 deaths per 100,000 boats 2.8 deaths per 10,000,000 boating hours (heroic assumption; 250hrs per boat pa) Source: http://www.uscgboating.org/statistic...stics_2002.pdf --------------------------------------- General Aviation (220,000 aircraft, 30,000,000 hours flown) Deaths pa 600 (1,800 accidents) 0.2 deaths per 100,000 population 270 deaths per 100,000 aircraft 200 deaths per 10,000,000 flying hours Source: http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2004/ARG0401.pdf ---------------------------------------------- The idea was to put some factual scale into rants about relative safety of different leisure occupations. Apologies to those who've been bored by these tables before. They're more accurate now. -- JimB http://www.jimbaerselman.f2s.com/ Describing some Greek and Spanish cruising areas |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
News f2s wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message news ![]() I have trouble following your logic, and where did you get those numbers??? here's a good source: http://www.uscgboating.org/statistic...dent_stats.htm same source, excepting a correction in sailboat numbers for those states which don't require sailboats and auxiliary sailboats to be registers. *However* serious finger trouble on my part and lack of double checking changed 4% into 40%! ------------------------------------------- Boats (12,000,000 - of which sail and Aux sail 40%) 12 million boats are registered, but only about 140,000 see below, or 1.2% are auxiliary sail, with slightly over have being outboards. I don't know how you could think 40% of all boats are sail! Agreed. I was looking in 2002 for comparable figures in aviation and vehicles as well. In 2002 the CG recorded 216,657 auxiliary sailboats and 123,772 sail boats (340,429 - 2.5% of the total fleet) with possibly a further 50,000 from states which did not require registration of these vessels, but required power only registration. I know - 3%. Good thing you were there to check! The 2002 numbers are quite quirky. In the several years before, and several years after, the number of auxiliary sailboats is about 140,000, or 1.2% of the fleet. How 75000 sailboats suddenly appeared in 2002 and then disappeared in 2003 is beyond me. The only aux sailboats not registered would be in some states that waive registration of vessels with engines under 10 hp, and I don't think many of those are left. Unpowered sailboats are hardly worth considering because the numbers are so unreliable. In addition to the problems in counting them, I've never heard of an accident (other than a fatality) on a small boat being reported. And certainly, in a discussion about propeller strikes, including unpowered vessels isn't fair! .... The point of my original quotation of rates per 100,000 etc was to show the following(now corrected!) ------------------------------------- Cars. (number not known by me) .... 4.5 per 10,000,000 hours .... 2.8 deaths per 10,000,000 boating hours (heroic assumption; 250hrs per boat pa) Remember, if your guess of 250 hours is high by a factor of 2, then boats are more dangerous (by the hour) then cars. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff" wrote in message ... The 2002 numbers are quite quirky. In the several years before, and several years after, the number of auxiliary sailboats is about 140,000, or 1.2% of the fleet. How 75000 sailboats suddenly appeared in 2002 and then disappeared in 2003 is beyond me. Sure , take your word for it. And certainly, in a discussion about propeller strikes, including unpowered vessels isn't fair! Didn't intend that . Agreed. My thesis, earlier in the thread, was tackling the comparative risks between Autos, Aviation and Boats. So I jumped into a discussion on a different beam. Remember, if your guess of 250 hours is high by a factor of 2, then boats are more dangerous (by the hour) then cars. Sure. Except in UK. We seem to have very safe roads; heaven knows why, they're so crowded! It was the Aviation stats that interested me. An earlier argument in this forum contended that Genreal Aviation flying was safer then whatever. The imputaion was that the insurance hikes in general aviation may invade boating if boating third party boat insurance was made compulsory. I couldn't swallow that, so I went home to do the work. You can see the numbers. It's not often you see two orders of difference in the risks. Trivialises other activities. I'll go with the idea that boating risks are similar to car risks. That's why insurance premiums per capital value are similar. Private aircraft? Whoa there! different game! 10 times the risk? 100 times the risk? Who cares about the odd 20% here or there. Definitely dodgy. Perspective - which you have. Picks up stupid errors. -- JimB http://www.jimbaerselman.f2s.com/ Describing some Greek and Spanish cruising areas |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "News f2s" wrote in message ... Sure. Except in UK. We seem to have very safe roads; heaven knows why, they're so crowded! The UK ranks very low, with 1.4 deaths per 100 million passenger miles, but the USA is not too far off at 1.7, with stricter reporting. Most other coutries are significantly worse. http://www.benbest.com/lifeext/causes.html scroll about 85% down. Private aircraft? Whoa there! different game! 10 times the risk? 100 times the risk? Who cares about the odd 20% here or there. Definitely dodgy. I started taking lessons once, until a friend (who now owns a plane) pointed out that many of the pilots we knew had crashed or had done a rough forced landing. I decided I could only fully commit to one sport! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boat Sank due to Syphoning Effect | Cruising | |||
Grist for the discussion mill....(long)... | General | |||
Urgent ! Can anyone understand these safety data ? | Cruising | |||
Who Am I | General |