Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Nautical Charts... political troll
In article , Dave
wrote: On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:41:52 -0500, DSK said: Right, but Peter's point is still valid_ that it may cost more to bill for the data & collect payment than they are receiving, and the data itself is already paid for ...and there is enough "common good" benefit that it's not really bilking the taxpayers even if they don't have the foggiest idea why they need it. Agreed certainly in the case of Internet distribution like what NOAA is doing now. My real point was that questions like this ought not to be decided based on moralistic screaming about the fact that the taxpayers have already paid for the initial cost. Charts are expensive, but I don't believe for a minute that yachtsmen have paid the entire cost of the surveying, much less everything else. And I don't believe we should, either; for the same reasons that I don't believe residents of the area devastated by Hurricane Katrina should bear the whole cost of rebuilding. While I don't necessarily agree with your rationale, I do accept the conclusion. There are perfectly good reasons for the public's paying for the collection of data and preparation of the charts. Among other things, the Navy and CG need decent charts; and there don't seem to be any entrepreneurs with open check books seeking to form a private marine charting operation. And I venture to state that there never will be, even with swathe mapping and differential GPS. If I can justify it, I'm gonna fit a swathe mapper next time we do a big refit. PDW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Free downloads of official NOAA raster charts | General | |||
charts and parts mailing list -- announcement | General | |||
Free NOAA ENC Charts vs. Free Maptech Charts | Cruising | |||
US Water BSB charts now free (NOAA RNCs) | Electronics | |||
Fugawi Demo Software - Supports new free BSB charts | Cruising |