BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   Cruising (https://www.boatbanter.com/cruising/)
-   -   Automatic distress VHF radios (https://www.boatbanter.com/cruising/65680-automatic-distress-vhf-radios.html)

Roger Long January 25th 06 12:17 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
I was looking at one of the new VHF radios today that has a data plug
to connect to the GPS. It sends out a preformatted distress message
with the boat’s position when you push the panic button on the panel.

This seems like a great idea for someone who cruises with kids,
family, and friends. Even if they are trained and drilled in reading
the GPS and making radio calls, being able to immediately turn their
attention to the emergency, like getting the skipper back on board,
would be a plus. If there was a fire or sudden flooding, you could
evacuate the boat and the radio would keep broadcasting longer than a
person could stay on board. I know that direct communication is best
when possible but I can see circumstances where this could be a
lifesaver.

However, I’m wondering. Will the USCG just ignore calls like this
thinking, "Some kid hit a button again.", or wait for direct contact?

Does anybody have any direct experience, feedback, or blatheringly
inane and useless observations on these units?


--

Roger Long





just me January 25th 06 12:29 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
I'll blather a little on this one.
I bought an Icom 502 VHF with the RAM mic.
I really like it. I wish it would accept the SeaTalk from my Raymarine GPS
though. But I'm going to buy an NEMA GPS antenna and complete the
installation anyway. It just make too much sense.





Roger Long January 25th 06 12:59 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 


--

Roger Long



"Roger Long" wrote in message
.. .
I was looking at one of the new VHF radios today that has a data plug
to connect to the GPS. It sends out a preformatted distress message
with the boat's position when you push the panic button on the panel.

This seems like a great idea for someone who cruises with kids,
family, and friends. Even if they are trained and drilled in reading
the GPS and making radio calls, being able to immediately turn their
attention to the emergency, like getting the skipper back on board,
would be a plus. If there was a fire or sudden flooding, you could
evacuate the boat and the radio would keep broadcasting longer than
a person could stay on board. I know that direct communication is
best when possible but I can see circumstances where this could be a
lifesaver.

However, I'm wondering. Will the USCG just ignore calls like this
thinking, "Some kid hit a button again.", or wait for direct
contact?

Does anybody have any direct experience, feedback, or blatheringly
inane and useless observations on these units?


--

Roger Long







Roger Long January 25th 06 12:59 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
This is worth reading.

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/dsc.htm

--

Roger Long



"Roger Long" wrote in message
.. .
I was looking at one of the new VHF radios today that has a data plug
to connect to the GPS. It sends out a preformatted distress message
with the boat's position when you push the panic button on the panel.

This seems like a great idea for someone who cruises with kids,
family, and friends. Even if they are trained and drilled in reading
the GPS and making radio calls, being able to immediately turn their
attention to the emergency, like getting the skipper back on board,
would be a plus. If there was a fire or sudden flooding, you could
evacuate the boat and the radio would keep broadcasting longer than
a person could stay on board. I know that direct communication is
best when possible but I can see circumstances where this could be a
lifesaver.

However, I'm wondering. Will the USCG just ignore calls like this
thinking, "Some kid hit a button again.", or wait for direct
contact?

Does anybody have any direct experience, feedback, or blatheringly
inane and useless observations on these units?


--

Roger Long







Jack Dale January 25th 06 01:12 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:59:48 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote:

This is worth reading.

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/dsc.htm



I am not sure about the US, but in Canada an endorsement to your VHF
Restricted Operator's Certificate is required. The Digital Selective
calling component is another plus.


Jack

Larry January 25th 06 01:12 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
"Roger Long" wrote in news:kszBf.114790$ME5.66716
@twister.nyroc.rr.com:

However, I'm wondering. Will the USCG just ignore calls like this
thinking, "Some kid hit a button again.", or wait for direct contact?


If the CG has the channel 70 capability at all.....and watches it.

The emergency declaration money is MUCH better spent on the best GPS-
equipped 406 Mhz EPIRB you can get. Then, you don't lose the
communications, just because the boat sank or the batteries got flooded.
If the boat sinks, suddenly, all you need to is throw the seawater-
activated 406 Mhz EPIRB overboard, tied off to your liferaft, and it
activates itself, sending your boat information, exact position, etc., to
the overhead cluster of LEO satellites, anywhere on the planet. NOONE
ignores a 406 EPIRB event. EVERYONE ignores a 121.5 Mhz EPIRB event
because so many go off by themselves in parked airplanes and there's no
satellite system backing them up.

I wouldn't sail offshore without a 406 EPIRB aboard. It's stupid after
so much effort was put into making the system work so well, just to save
the sailor a few hundred dollars....

Ours is attached to the end of the ditchbag, always at hand.

It also has a strobe that will blind you for when the chopper is close to
pick up the dead bodies.

The emergency VHF button is a waste of time because you'll be out of
range when you need it most. 406 EPIRB is NEVER out of range....even in
Kansas, Dorothy.


Roger Long January 25th 06 01:26 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
"Larry" wrote The emergency VHF button is a waste
of time because you'll be out of
range when you need it most.


True, but I'm just looking at coastal sailing in Maine at this point.
There are a lot of boats around and many of them commercial and USCG
inspected so it's pretty likely someone will pick up the signal.

Offshore, the 406 certainly. The 125.5's really are useless. I used
to be in the Civil Air Patrol and they couldn't even find them when
they were going off on the airport.

--

Roger Long





Wayne.B January 25th 06 03:05 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:26:39 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote:

True, but I'm just looking at coastal sailing in Maine at this point.
There are a lot of boats around and many of them commercial and USCG
inspected so it's pretty likely someone will pick up the signal.


Coastal Maine there is always someone around on channel 16. It's
really difficult to get out of sight of at least several working
lobster boats in my experience. You have to speak their language of
course, ayep.


scott January 25th 06 03:06 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Ok, here is a direct observation - last weekend we were sailing offshore
between Cape Fear and the St. John's River and heard a VHF CH 16 Coast Guard
"Pan Pan Pan. We have received a DSC distress signal from an unidentified
vessel at an unknown location. All vessels are requested to report any
information . . .etc." Or words more or less to that effect. This was
repeated a few times but then that was the end of it. So, the Coast Guard
*is* listening for DSC emergency signals at at least some locations. And,
the DSC service is useless unless the owner goes to the trouble to register
it. In this case, who knows -- childsplay, drunken tomfoolery, a mistake,
or maybe even a legitimate distress call from an unregistered radio.
Scott

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:17:20 GMT, "Roger Long" said:

However, I'm wondering. Will the USCG just ignore calls like this
thinking, "Some kid hit a button again.", or wait for direct contact?


Dunno about the model you looked at, but on mine, at least, you have to
lift
a plastic tab to get at the button, so a kid has to be trying if he's to
hit
the button.




Larry January 25th 06 12:05 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Dave wrote in
:

On the contrary, many if not most of us do our cruising within VHF
range of at least some other vessels. And since the radios
automatically pick up transmissions on Channel 70, all you need is
another vessel with the capability in the vicinity.




You are aware that ships on automatic don't even have people on the bridge
to hear it, right? Call 'em on the radio on 16 and see if you can raise
'em.

Those other boats are monitoring their "fishing channel", talking to their
buddies. None of them have full-blown Channel 70 GMDSS systems. If they
have any DSC at all, it's transmit-only just like yours.

The 406 EPIRB isn't by chance that someone will listen......

You just need to determine if life is worth the money.


Peter Bennett January 25th 06 05:55 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:12:02 GMT, Jack Dale
wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:59:48 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote:

This is worth reading.

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/dsc.htm



I am not sure about the US, but in Canada an endorsement to your VHF
Restricted Operator's Certificate is required. The Digital Selective
calling component is another plus.


Jack


No - a DSC endorsment is not required in Canada (not yet, anyway), but
all new operator certificates will include a DSC endorsement.
Canadian Power Squadrons does offer a separate manual and exam for the
DSC endorsment for current holders of an operator's certificate.



--
Peter Bennett VE7CEI
email: peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca
GPS and NMEA info and programs: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter/index.html
Newsgroup new user info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq

Peter Bennett January 25th 06 06:03 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:05:34 -0500, Larry wrote:


You are aware that ships on automatic don't even have people on the bridge
to hear it, right? Call 'em on the radio on 16 and see if you can raise
'em.


But if you call them on 70 with DSC, an alarm will sound.

Those other boats are monitoring their "fishing channel", talking to their
buddies. None of them have full-blown Channel 70 GMDSS systems. If they
have any DSC at all, it's transmit-only just like yours.


Even the primitive SC-101 grade DSC radios will receive DSC calls if
enabled, and will sound an alarm for distress calls.

Unfortunately, some SC-101 radios come with the channel 70 receive
function disabled.

The 406 EPIRB isn't by chance that someone will listen......


I understand that it may take an hour or more after an EPIRB is
activated before the appropriate authorities are notified. DSC
notification is immediate.

IMPORTANT!! - the DSC distress call (and other DSC calling functions)
WILL NOT work unless an MMSI is programmed into the radio. Also, the
radio should be connected to a GPS receiver to permit it to provide
your correct position.



--
Peter Bennett VE7CEI
email: peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca
GPS and NMEA info and programs: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter/index.html
Newsgroup new user info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq

Peter Bennett January 25th 06 06:04 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On 24 Jan 2006 20:07:01 -0600, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:17:20 GMT, "Roger Long" said:

However, I’m wondering. Will the USCG just ignore calls like this
thinking, "Some kid hit a button again.", or wait for direct contact?


Dunno about the model you looked at, but on mine, at least, you have to lift
a plastic tab to get at the button, so a kid has to be trying if he's to hit
the button.


On the radios I've looked at, you also have to hold the button for a
few seconds, and/or do it twice, before the distress call is sent.


--
Peter Bennett VE7CEI
email: peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca
GPS and NMEA info and programs: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter/index.html
Newsgroup new user info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq

[email protected] January 25th 06 07:38 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
You are aware that ships on automatic don't even have people
on the bridge to hear it, right? Call 'em on the radio on 16
and see if you can raise 'em.

Larry... I spend a considerable amount of time on a small container
ship that runs from the West Coast to several regular ports of call in
the South Pacific. It takes us almost thirty (30) days (most of which
is sea time) to complete a round.

Any how... while at sea... even though we are on auto pilot... we
*always* maintain a bridge watch 24 hours a day. The Master and
the two senior deck officers maintain shifts inorder to do so. Theo-
retically... an A.B. is on the bridge as well... but they are never
present... unless we go off A.P. then they assume the helmsman
duties.

Never the less... the watch is kind of a joke... especially way out
to sea in very lightly traveled shipping lanes... such as ours.

Note: We maintain an approximate heading of 202 degrees from
the time we leave the Golden Gate to outside of Papeete.

Often as not... the bridge duty officer is preoccuppied with constant
paper work and on going questions that are generated over the air
waves by the charter much less the ship's owner. The VHF unit may
or may not be on...and if so... the squelch threshhold level is set
so high... that an outside party would have to be right next door...
to break through.

So the laypersons perception of a typical bridge watch... the duty
officer walking around with binocular in hand... constantly scanning
the surrounding seas about him... tain't necessaryily so... at least
when far out to sea.

A MOB situation is even more distressing (no pun intended). Beside
not having the time to constantly view the immediate area around the
ship... spotting such a victim is not that easy. From the heights
of the bridge your are but a small speck in the ocean to the naked
eye... and it would probably be just pure luck to be observed.

Just my two cents worth... relative to manned bridge watches.

Bill


Wayne.B January 25th 06 08:59 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On 25 Jan 2006 11:38:59 -0800, wrote:

Often as not... the bridge duty officer is preoccuppied with constant
paper work and on going questions that are generated over the air
waves by the charter much less the ship's owner.


Just curious whether you communicate via satellite or on HF radio.


Bruce in Alaska January 25th 06 09:07 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
In article ,
Dave wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:05:34 -0500, Larry said:

If they
have any DSC at all, it's transmit-only just like yours.


Perhaps you could explain the following from the manual for one of the
common VHF units:

"Receiving an All Ships Call
If you are currently on a selected working channel or private channel, in
the Monitor mode, or in the Scan mode, the radio automatically enters
DSC mode when an All Ships Call is received. The type of call is displayed
in the small channel display and an alarm is sounded.

Press the DSC/PRI key once and the radio automatically selects channel
16. There is no acknowledge required for an All Ships Call. If you do not
wish to accept the call, press the 16 key to exit the DSC mode."


Yep, the above IS correct. However, look at what it really says.....
"IF" you are in the "Monitor Mode", or the "SCAN Mode" then your radio
will respond to a DSC Call, but only IF it isn't already receiving on
another channel, AND the DSC Call lasts long enough for the scan rate of
the receiver to get to Ch 70, and decode a complete DSC Sentance....
otherwise you don't get any indication that a DSC Call was ever received.
Are you willing to BET your LIFE, that other boaters IN your area,
understand how to correctly operate their DSC equiped radio, AND
will respond to your call? This IS Exactly Why, the 406 EPIRB is
required equipment on any FVSA Compulsury Required Vessels AND any
SOLAS Required Vessels, and is the PRIMARY Distress Notification
Device aboard. It WORKS, and has a Proven SAR Track Record.

Bruce in alaska
--
add a 2 before @

[email protected] January 25th 06 11:14 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Now you've done it! Shot down the whole basis for the constant
claims of the know-it-all crowd that bridges on commercial vessels
aren't manned much of the time.

Dave... My knowledge of the SOP of bridge watches aboard commercial
vessels in general... is very limited. It could well be that some
Masters *are* rather lax about bridge duty while underway out in the
middle of nowhere and on auto pilot.

I am only familiar with the container ship that I hang out with. And
yeh they do the 24 thing... but subject to the distractions that I
posted earlier. I suspect too... that in the middle of the night and
early morning hours things can get a little sleepy up there... if you
get my drift. I know our wheel house though very spacious... was
quite comfortable and cozy as well. (smile)

I failed to mention this little bit of nautical trivia in my earlier
posting. The engine room no longer has to be personally manned
24 hours like it use to be. This may be where some of the confusion
has come from relative to unmanned duty stations.

The chief engineering officer and his crew have computer alarm
systems in their personal accomodations that are activated when
they are done for the day down below. The electrical engineer's
(who's part of the "blackgang") cabin was right next to mine... and
often I would hear that alarm going off during the night for one mec-
hanical problem or another. Then followed by the chief engineers
pitter patter of foot steps running down the stair well to supervise
the incident.

Or if you didn't hear the alarms... another attention getter was to
wake up in the middle of the night and experience total silence...
the engine has shut down. You get so use to the rumble of the
engine and propeller shaft... that the silence is almost deafen-
ing... so to speak. One thing about it though... you knew the
engine crew had a problem going on. If necessary... soon the
back up engine(s) would be started up and at least our electrical
capabilities would be reinstated... until such time the "main"
could be fired up and we could get underway again.

Note: On this particular vessel the main engine not only propelled
the ship but provided the electrical as well. The two back ups
were not operational at sea (only in port)... or per the aforemen-
tioned circumstances.

Bill


Gary January 26th 06 12:57 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Dave wrote:
On 25 Jan 2006 11:38:59 -0800, said:


The VHF unit may
or may not be on...and if so... the squelch threshhold level is set
so high... that an outside party would have to be right next door...
to break through.



Now you've done it! Shot down the whole basis for the constant claims of the
know-it-all crowd that bridges on commercial vessels aren't manned much of
the time.

I am in the Navy.

We hail passing commercial ships where ever we go and keep a continuous
picture of who is where (linked to other naval units throughout the
hemisphere). We rarely don't get an answer. It is the law to keep a
proper watch and most ships play by the internationally accepted rules.
If the previous poster - billwarnock - is a watchkeeper on that
container ship then he is a very poor one. If he is a passenger he is
riding on a very poorly run ship. If he is crew then he should report
the command team.

Likely it is nothing but exageration.

Few ships steam around without a proper watch "by all available means"
these days.

Gaz

Gary January 26th 06 01:03 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Bruce in Alaska wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:


On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:05:34 -0500, Larry said:


If they
have any DSC at all, it's transmit-only just like yours.


Perhaps you could explain the following from the manual for one of the
common VHF units:

"Receiving an All Ships Call
If you are currently on a selected working channel or private channel, in
the Monitor mode, or in the Scan mode, the radio automatically enters
DSC mode when an All Ships Call is received. The type of call is displayed
in the small channel display and an alarm is sounded.

Press the DSC/PRI key once and the radio automatically selects channel
16. There is no acknowledge required for an All Ships Call. If you do not
wish to accept the call, press the 16 key to exit the DSC mode."



Yep, the above IS correct. However, look at what it really says.....
"IF" you are in the "Monitor Mode", or the "SCAN Mode" then your radio
will respond to a DSC Call, but only IF it isn't already receiving on
another channel, AND the DSC Call lasts long enough for the scan rate of
the receiver to get to Ch 70, and decode a complete DSC Sentance....
otherwise you don't get any indication that a DSC Call was ever received.
Are you willing to BET your LIFE, that other boaters IN your area,
understand how to correctly operate their DSC equiped radio, AND
will respond to your call? This IS Exactly Why, the 406 EPIRB is
required equipment on any FVSA Compulsury Required Vessels AND any
SOLAS Required Vessels, and is the PRIMARY Distress Notification
Device aboard. It WORKS, and has a Proven SAR Track Record.

Bruce in alaska

When you compare VHF radios with EPIRBs you are comparing apples and
oranges. VHF radios are for short range comms including distress and
calling. (even the DSC ones) EPIRB are locator beacons used to help
find the beacon (hopefully associated with an emergency) EPIRBs are not
designed to be tossed over the side willy nilly for fire and flood or
what ever. They won't let the guy two miles off your starboard quarter
know you have a problem. VHF will.

Gaz

Gordon January 26th 06 02:03 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Do those container ships ever carry passengers? Just curious.
Gordon


wrote in message
oups.com...
Now you've done it! Shot down the whole basis for the constant

claims of the know-it-all crowd that bridges on commercial vessels
aren't manned much of the time.

Dave... My knowledge of the SOP of bridge watches aboard commercial
vessels in general... is very limited. It could well be that some
Masters *are* rather lax about bridge duty while underway out in the
middle of nowhere and on auto pilot.

I am only familiar with the container ship that I hang out with. And
yeh they do the 24 thing... but subject to the distractions that I
posted earlier. I suspect too... that in the middle of the night and
early morning hours things can get a little sleepy up there... if you
get my drift. I know our wheel house though very spacious... was
quite comfortable and cozy as well. (smile)

I failed to mention this little bit of nautical trivia in my earlier
posting. The engine room no longer has to be personally manned
24 hours like it use to be. This may be where some of the confusion
has come from relative to unmanned duty stations.

The chief engineering officer and his crew have computer alarm
systems in their personal accomodations that are activated when
they are done for the day down below. The electrical engineer's
(who's part of the "blackgang") cabin was right next to mine... and
often I would hear that alarm going off during the night for one mec-
hanical problem or another. Then followed by the chief engineers
pitter patter of foot steps running down the stair well to supervise
the incident.

Or if you didn't hear the alarms... another attention getter was to
wake up in the middle of the night and experience total silence...
the engine has shut down. You get so use to the rumble of the
engine and propeller shaft... that the silence is almost deafen-
ing... so to speak. One thing about it though... you knew the
engine crew had a problem going on. If necessary... soon the
back up engine(s) would be started up and at least our electrical
capabilities would be reinstated... until such time the "main"
could be fired up and we could get underway again.

Note: On this particular vessel the main engine not only propelled
the ship but provided the electrical as well. The two back ups
were not operational at sea (only in port)... or per the aforemen-
tioned circumstances.

Bill




Wayne.B January 26th 06 03:04 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:03:27 GMT, Gary wrote:

They won't let the guy two miles off your starboard quarter
know you have a problem. VHF will.


Absolutely, just call mayday on channel 16. You'll get quicker
results in most places, and hopefully you already know your lat/lon.


Larry January 26th 06 03:44 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
wrote in news:1138217939.683622.314630
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:

Often as not... the bridge duty officer is preoccuppied with constant
paper work and on going questions that are generated over the air
waves by the charter much less the ship's owner. The VHF unit may
or may not be on...and if so... the squelch threshhold level is set
so high... that an outside party would have to be right next door...
to break through.



Thank you, Bill. That's precisely what I was talking about. These
boaters think the ships are like a WW2 destroyer with watches on bow,
stern, bridge wings and in the crow's nest. It's just not true, as you
say. It's why their sailboats get run down, occasionally and noone on
the ship notices it.

When I'm on a midwatch, bored to tears, and I see a ship on radar or its
lights, I try to call them on 16 or 13 just to see if anyone is really
listening. Once in a while I get a response, most times NOTHING....same
with fishing boats. Sure there's lots of boats close to shore within the
15 mile range of a VHF, but most of them aren't listening to 16, much
less the Channel 70 dream channel. We have two VHF DSC radios and the
Icom M802 on HF....I'd hate to think I had to find someone to answer my
distress call 100 miles S of the Charleston Jetties on the edge of the
Gulf Stream when I haven't seen a soul since we passed the Savannah ship
channel.

Those of you that think you're going to get attention, just try it. When
you're out there cruising along, switch to Channel 16 and just call for
any station to respond to see if anyone is listening. That's not an
emergency. Do what the boaters all do in the harbor, ask for a radio
check and see if anyone answers. I bet you'll feel very "alone"....

It's way time the world's governments, including ours, with ITU support
simply decided if you can't afford a working GPS-enabled EPIRB, you don't
belong out of sight of land. It's the least you can do for yourself,
your passengers and those poor *******s that have to look for you over
hundreds of square miles when you don't show up. Simple...No 406 EPIRB
with a current status sticker from the safety shop...no leaving the 3
mile limit into International Waters.

Like Bruce says and all his Alaskan fishermen know...406 EPIRB works
great. What I don't understand is this stupid reluctance to use it if
you're stranded "out there" and noone answers your VHF call. What's with
that? You don't have to be drowning to call for help, do you, when it's
too late?? This goddamned independence fetish lots of boaters have is
what's killing them.


Larry January 26th 06 03:49 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Dave wrote in news:5uegt152h7stj7slpie2r1sk7el7s4e3tc@
4ax.com:

That was my Navy experience as well, though we didn't have that much
occasion to hail commercial ships.



Drivers keep a careful watch on the speedometer on the Interstate when they
know the cops are around, too, you know. No cops (Navy)...well, some let
it slide.

Of course, we are talking about a US-licensed containership with a licensed
captain, right?.....not some Liberian freighter with the crack crew of
illegal misfits in some rusty bucket with a cracked #2 cylinder wall
leaking lube oil into the bilge...that's never been inspected unless the
drug cops show up.


Larry January 26th 06 03:52 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Peter Bennett wrote in
:

On the radios I've looked at, you also have to hold the button for a
few seconds, and/or do it twice, before the distress call is sent.


Y'all boys look under my berth. You'll find an old Motorola 3 watt AMPS
bagphone that plugs into the 6db cellphone antenna 55' up on top of the
mainmast. It's good to about 50 miles offshore in SC to call 911....(c;


Roger Long January 26th 06 10:33 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
I may know my position. My kids may know how to read it off the GPS.
But, if I should go overboard, we won't know until after it happens if
the lesson will stick in their minds when they are watching their
father disappear astern. I know that everyone in this newsgroup
always spends the first three hours when they take a guest sailing for
the first time on man overboard drills and lessons in how to use the
radio and GPS (right). I don't know whether those lessons will stick
under duress either. It isn't just going overboard. The outcome of a
fall, heart attack, stroke, getting hit by the boom, could be very
different. Even if I'm not disabled, being able to attend almost
instantly to the emergency while the micro chips call for the calvary
could significantly increase the odds.

I'm always amazed at how these threads get into "either / or" and
"which is best" spats. It's like arguing which is more important to
have in your onboard tool box, pliers, or a screwdriver. If I see
another boat and have time, I'll hail on 16 and avoid stirring up the
whole system. If I'm on fire and can't get it out, I'll push the
button and jump into the dinghy. If I'm sinking offshore, I'll have
and use the 406. It's a toolbox and DCS is a great new tool.

--

Roger Long



"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:03:27 GMT, Gary
wrote:

They won't let the guy two miles off your starboard quarter
know you have a problem. VHF will.


Absolutely, just call mayday on channel 16. You'll get quicker
results in most places, and hopefully you already know your lat/lon.




Skip Gundlach January 26th 06 03:30 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Ignoring all the other stuff already posted, I comment that my cockpit radio
has DSC - at 99 bux.

My nav table radio, with hailer, and DSC, was all of 169 bux.

Anyone who can afford to be offshore shouldn't be unable to buy one of these
straight up, never mind "upgrading"...

Now, I'm looking for the integrated handheld GPS/VHF with that feature :{))

PS the SSB has it, too - and that *isn't* reliant on LOS tx/rx...

L8R

Skip, off to water therapy; moveaboard is approaching!

--
Morgan 461 #2
SV Flying Pig KI4MPC
http://tinyurl.com/384p2 The vessel as Tehamana, as we bought her

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you
didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail
away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore.
Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain



[email protected] January 26th 06 04:50 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:33:41 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote:

I'm always amazed at how these threads get into "either / or" and
"which is best" spats.


It's a fallacious form of argument you see used in politics all the
time to push one agenda or another. "The money your want to spend on X
could be better spent on [insert speaker's favorite hobby horse]." The
fallacy is in arguing, not that it's a good idea to spend for [hobby
horse], but that we've already addressed whether to spend the money
and the only question is on what.


Bruce in Alaska January 26th 06 07:40 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
In article .com,
wrote:

The VHF unit may
or may not be on...and if so... the squelch threshhold level is set
so high... that an outside party would have to be right next door...
to break through.


If you were navigating a US Flagged Vessel...the above would be a DIRECT
Violation of the Bridge to Bridge Radiotelephone Act. Shame on you...


Bruce in alaska
--
add a 2 before @

Bruce in Alaska January 26th 06 07:45 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
In article ,
Wayne.B wrote:

On 25 Jan 2006 11:38:59 -0800, wrote:

Often as not... the bridge duty officer is preoccuppied with constant
paper work and on going questions that are generated over the air
waves by the charter much less the ship's owner.


Just curious whether you communicate via satellite or on HF radio.


Most all comms from SOLAS Required Vessels, (anything over 300 Tons)
these days is done via redundent INMARSAT Terminals with MF/HF Radios as
a backup.....

Bruce in alaska
--
add a 2 before @

Bruce in Alaska January 26th 06 07:53 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
In article ,
"Gordon" wrote:

Do those container ships ever carry passengers? Just curious.
Gordon


Most large commercial Cargo Ships are equipt to carry six, or less,
Passengers onboard during voyages. If they should carry more than six,
they would then be classed as a Passenger Ship, and would then need to
comply with the SOLAS Requirements for a Passenger Ship, which are
significanly more involved, that that of a Cargo Ship.

Bruce in alaska
--
add a 2 before @

Wayne.B January 26th 06 09:43 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:33:41 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote:

It's a toolbox and DCS is a great new tool.


No argument there, it has good potential. I'm not sure it's quite
ready for prime time however, and it is always good for at least one
other person on board to know how to work the radio.


[email protected] January 26th 06 10:58 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Do those container ships ever carry passengers? Just curious.

Gordon...

Some do. I believe they are all foreign flagged vessels... according
to a friend of mine that is an electronics/radio officer for Matson...
no American flagged commercial ships do this.

I think one of the reasons for this type of occupancy (pax) being
available is that the foreign flagged vessels have been allowed to
cut back on some of the minimum crew compliment requirements
in the past few years.

To the best of my knowledge if they have the accommodations...
they can bring aboard no more then 12 passengers... otherwise
a medical doctor must be present as well. Bruce rendered a different
opinion... and may be more up to speed about this sort of thing than
I am.

Any how... here is some info to get you started...

The best web site that I know of concerning this type of
cruising is at:

http://www.geocities.com/freighterman.geo/

You can spend quite a bit of time viewing the links in
"freighterman's" site.

Judd Spittler has an excellant personal web site depicting
his experiences... which can be seen at:

http://www.juddspittler.com/freighterbum/index.htm

My main squeeze for freighter bookings is with Joycene Deal
at FreighterWorlds in Pasadena, California. For the record
there are several other agencies around that specialize in
this sort of thing besides Joycene's office. FreighterWorld
also has a very informative site at:

http://www.freighterworld.com/index.html

The above references will keep you busy for quite awhile.

Best regards

Bill


Larry January 26th 06 11:20 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Dave wrote in
:

What is your basis for believing that those who have these units don't
use them?



I was referring to what one poster said about they weren't for when you're
stranded with a broken engine or out of fuel....


Larry January 26th 06 11:21 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Bruce in Alaska wrote in news:bruceg-
:

If you were navigating a US Flagged Vessel...the above would be a DIRECT
Violation of the Bridge to Bridge Radiotelephone Act. Shame on you...


Bruce, what section deals with how tight you set the squelch? I musta
missed that prose in my copy...(c;


Larry January 26th 06 11:25 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
wrote in news:1138316324.034663.308230
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Some do. I believe they are all foreign flagged vessels... according
to a friend of mine that is an electronics/radio officer for Matson...
no American flagged commercial ships do this.


When my wife, now ex-wife, was a test coordinator at the MSO Group
Charleston, the guys from Evergreen were always trying to get us to book
passage to Europe or Asia on the Evergreen Lines ships out of Charleston.
I know someone who's gone to Europe many times on ships from here and they
said it was more fun getting TO Europe than it was being IN Europe.

Of course, he's an engineer and they let him in the engine room, let him
play helmsman, etc. I doubt his wife enjoyed that more than she did
Amsterdam...(c;


[email protected] January 27th 06 01:22 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 

I am in the Navy.


Gary... I am very familiar with your credentials... much less your
contributions on this forum as well the chaotic A.S.A gang. I have
enjoyed your past postings and feel that the viewing public has
benefitted quite a bit from your expertise as a seaman and naval
officer with an active command assignment (HMCS Oriole).

Having said that... I will cut the crap and get to the chase so to
speak.

Few ships steam around without a proper watch...


While I am unqualified to make such a statement... I did try to
indicate to a poster who questioned this fact... that in my limited
experience aboard one particular vessel we *did* maintain a 24
hour bridge watch... albeit with certain distractions.

If the previous poster - billwarnock... is a passenger he is

riding on a very poorly run ship.

I feel that was a rather harsh generalization to make based on
my limited commentary.

I guess I should have said something about all the numerious type
drills (abandon ship... fire... hazmat...terrorist etc..) that were
routinely undertaken and on a continuing basis. Or the daily
inspections made by the Master and deck officers throughout
the vessel during the day and night. Or the two hour saftey classes
(all hands... excluding the bridge watch)held every Friday afternoon
with questions and expected correct answers.

Or the real lifeboat launch with some crew aboard...which can
sometimes be hazardous to one's well being... sprained backs
etc.. Their lifeboat is one that looks like a giant hi top shoe that's
sits way above the poop deck on a launching ramp... and when
the coxswain pulls the releasing hooks... the lifeboat flies off
the end of the stern into the water... reminding you of something
like a Disneyland ride. Because of the possibility of injury in
this type of a drill... it wasn't done any more than what the law
required... I believe every three months.

Or some of our fire drills... when the chief engineer would literally
start a controlled fire (in a safe area of course) so that the fire
fighting detail would have to experience the use of their breathing
apparatus and making their way in a smoke filled invironment with
limited vision and sense of direction.

We hail passing commercial ships where ever we go...


And I am very certain that on our ship... who ever was the duty
officer on the bridge would make sure that his communication
abilities were functional and would be responsive to any *official*
vessel that was hailing.

On the other hand... I sailed with one master (Russian) who
wouldn't bother to talk with one of our sister ships going the
other way... for whatever reason. Now the authorities... he
was always commutative for obvious reasons

Likely it is nothing but exageration.


Gary... I attempt to write honestly and openingly (to a fault
sometimes)
even my email address is for real.

Accordingly I did not mean to exaggerate things as I saw them
on the bridge of my ship. Then again my writtings are subject
to my perception of things...

Being an ex Marine (FMF) I was on a myriad of Navy vessels...
and some what exposed to this type of maritime environment
and discipline required to keep things running smoothly.

On a small foreign flagged container ship with a minimally staffed
multi national crew... was a whole different ball game altogether.
Yet, from what I saw on this ship, the officers and crew were
credentialed and capable and ran an impeccably well maintained
ship.

I don't know if you have had much prolonged exposure to this
type of a maritime setting... but trust me... it's quite a trip. :-)

Best regards

Bill


Gary January 27th 06 01:25 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:49:39 -0500, Larry said:


Drivers keep a careful watch on the speedometer on the Interstate when they
know the cops are around, too, you know. No cops (Navy)...well, some let
it slide.



I think you may have a fundamental misconception about what the Navy does. A
misconception not shared by most other mariners.

Concur!

Gaz

Gary January 27th 06 02:17 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
wrote:


I feel that was a rather harsh generalization to make based on
my limited commentary.

I guess I should have said something about all the numerious type
drills (abandon ship... fire... hazmat...terrorist etc..) that were
routinely undertaken and on a continuing basis. Or the daily
inspections made by the Master and deck officers throughout
the vessel during the day and night. Or the two hour saftey classes
(all hands... excluding the bridge watch)held every Friday afternoon
with questions and expected correct answers.

Or the real lifeboat launch with some crew aboard...which can
sometimes be hazardous to one's well being... sprained backs
etc.. Their lifeboat is one that looks like a giant hi top shoe that's
sits way above the poop deck on a launching ramp... and when
the coxswain pulls the releasing hooks... the lifeboat flies off
the end of the stern into the water... reminding you of something
like a Disneyland ride. Because of the possibility of injury in
this type of a drill... it wasn't done any more than what the law
required... I believe every three months.

Or some of our fire drills... when the chief engineer would literally
start a controlled fire (in a safe area of course) so that the fire
fighting detail would have to experience the use of their breathing
apparatus and making their way in a smoke filled invironment with
limited vision and sense of direction.


We hail passing commercial ships where ever we go...



And I am very certain that on our ship... who ever was the duty
officer on the bridge would make sure that his communication
abilities were functional and would be responsive to any *official*
vessel that was hailing.

On the other hand... I sailed with one master (Russian) who
wouldn't bother to talk with one of our sister ships going the
other way... for whatever reason. Now the authorities... he
was always commutative for obvious reasons



On a small foreign flagged container ship with a minimally staffed
multi national crew... was a whole different ball game altogether.
Yet, from what I saw on this ship, the officers and crew were
credentialed and capable and ran an impeccably well maintained
ship.


Best regards

Bill

It would seem that the ship was properly run. The lack of
professionalism of some individuals shouldn't tar the rest. Hopefully
they learn to keep a proper lookout cheaply and don't run over someone
in the meatime.

Gaz

Bruce in Alaska January 27th 06 07:56 PM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 
In article .com,
wrote:

The VHF unit may
or may not be on...and if so... the squelch threshhold level is set
so high... that an outside party would have to be right next door...
to break through.


In article ,
Larry wrote:

Bruce in Alaska wrote in news:bruceg-
:

If you were navigating a US Flagged Vessel...the above would be a DIRECT
Violation of the Bridge to Bridge Radiotelephone Act. Shame on you...


Bruce, what section deals with how tight you set the squelch? I musta
missed that prose in my copy...(c;


It wasn't the Squelch setting I was refering to in the OP's post. It
was the fact that the VHF Radio "may or may not be on".... When
Navigating, ALL US Flagged Vessels over 20 meters in length, MUST
maintain a 24/7 Radio Watch on Vhf Marine Ch. 13, Period, no excusses,
and if such a Watch was not maintained, and an Incident that provoked
a USCG Inquiry happened, the Vessels Captain would loose his License,
for not maintaining such a Watch, not withstanding any other
circumstance.
I have been involved in USCG Inquiry's where this has happened, and
testified on the technical aspects, and operability, of the VHF Radio
in question. I have also been involved with the enforcment of the
Bridge to Bridge Radiotelephone ACT, from the regulatory side, on
SOLAS Required Vessels of US Flagged and that of other countries.


Bruce in alaska
--
add a 2 before @

Cold January 28th 06 10:31 AM

Automatic distress VHF radios
 

a Raymarine junction box will let you feed your GPS antenna's signal to
the RCA plug on the Icom, to a Big Bay ( marinized PC ). It's just a
terminal strip inside a box. Just a thought...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com