![]() |
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
|
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:29:49 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:50:18 GMT, Commodore Joe Redcloud wrote: The question was: WILL THIS MODEL BOAT MAKE THE CROSSING? ========================================== And the answer of course is definitely maybe. At best it will be a cold wet ride in a small boat. The wrong small boat in my opinion, but people have done it in less and lived to tell about it. A lot of people who ask questions like this have never been offshore in a small boat and have rose colored glasses on regarding the whole experience. It's my opinion, for what ever that is worth, that they should hear the downside as well. Crossing oceans in a 33 ft boat should not be taken lightly, especially in a boat that is not paticularly well suited for the job. The C&C 33 for all of its fine qualities was not designed and built as a passagemaker, and its designers would be the first to tell you that if asked. You could ask George Cuthbertson and Rob Ball (The Mark II, a different boat from the Mark I...and you should specify which one you have). Both are still living. Read the articles and check the owners' database on http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/ . Anyway, these guys will give you the straight dope. George C. is in his late '80s, but is still sharp and opinionated on the topic of boats. R. |
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
"Commodore Joe Redcloud" wrote in message
... On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:46:09 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Commodore Joe Redcloud" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:03:25 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: wrote in message legroups.com... Thanks all. The points of view on this forum are, needless to say, colorful. So far there has been the "go for it", the "hell no I wouldn't go", the "it COULD make it", the "it WILL make it". But underlying all of these points have been "IF you do go, THEN you should do______." And that is what I've been looking for. I've considered selling and buying something else - but so much freakin' hassle. And I've considered upgrading all systems on the boat I've got. I'm going to haul her out for several months and then make a decision. I'll definitely talk to you guys soon. I've found more info and opinions on R.B.C. than on any other forum. Have a good new year. Rob Minton Yeh, but don't listen to Commode Joe. What are you so afraid of, Jon? Ok!! I think I won this troll.... You can now all see for yourself. Jon has now stated that his involvement here is simply as a disruptive troll. Only for you billy. I actually contributed to Rob's query. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 11:30:55 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote: Not that I would regularly quote Ted Turner, but didn't he say that the Mac was one of the worst races (in terms of conditions) that he ever participated in? If you mean the northern Lake Michigan race, and if he was sailing a ULDB, then sure. The Great Lakes in a mood can throw very severe conditions at a smaller boat, and even for Lakemax (740-odd feet) tankers and freighter, certain spots and certain conditions can snap 'em in half. Even "small" Lake Ontario kills people in "seaworthy" boats every year. But the Great Lakes are rarely stormy for long, and the worst of the storms are not sustained. An Atlantic gale can surround a boat for four or five days if it's slow moving or part of a train of depressions. At least on the Great Lakes, you have a reasonable expectation of seeing a heavy squall pass through quickly. Even stuff spun off hurricanes will move off in a day. That's why sailing on the Great Lakes in crap weather is good training, or so the sal****er boys tell me. Three hours of 40 knots and "square" 10 foot lake waves is like a day of 40 knot, 15 foot Atlantic rollers, because the period is a lot longer and the boat gets bashed in many situations with fewer wrenching motions. I was out in six to eight foot waves and 30-35 knots out of the east (long fetch for here) in mid-October and we had a hell of ride down to Toronto. That's why my caution isn't so much about the *hull* of the C&C as about other stuff. We took a wave aft that put about six inches in the cockpit, and it didn't drain as fast as I would have liked, despite the scuppers being open and clear. Had it been three times as much, the engine panel would've likely shorted and the stern would have squatted and the lockers would've let water below. Such were the compromises in making a lake/inshore racer in the '70s. Such would be the concerns of taking such a boat across the pond today. R. |
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
|
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
I was out in six to eight foot waves and 30-35 knots out of the east
(long fetch for here) in mid-October and we had a hell of ride down to Toronto. Six to eight foot waves are commonplace on the Atlantic, and are to be expected any time the wind blows 15 kts or more for over a few hours time. They are not gentle rollers either. The REALLY nasty stuff (over 20 feet) happens with winds over 35 kts for a day or so. The ocean pilot charts used to list the percentage of time that gale force winds could be expected for any given location and month. I'm not sure if they are still available or not, but there are no months when the probability is zero. |
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
A second to the steering... make sure you're emergency tiller works and you
know how to attach it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "DSK" wrote in message . .. wrote: Thanks all. The points of view on this forum are, needless to say, colorful. So far there has been the "go for it", the "hell no I wouldn't go", the "it COULD make it", the "it WILL make it". But underlying all of these points have been "IF you do go, THEN you should do______." And that is what I've been looking for. I've considered selling and buying something else - but so much freakin' hassle. And I've considered upgrading all systems on the boat I've got. That can be at least as expensive a buying another boat. Definitely have a rigger go over both standing & running rigging. Make sure that whatever type of reefing system you have, that it works well & that the crew is familiar with it. On deck, go around & rebed & upgrade backing plates to all hardware... checking for delam/core problems at the same time... and consider beefing up the hatches. One thing I'm not sure anybody else mentioned is steering. I'd recommend replacing the bushings & bearings, and replace anything that looks worn in the workings; inspect & tune up the sheaves, alignment, etc etc. On an ocean passage the steering gets a real workout! Whatever you do, make sure that you get enough time aboard with all new systems to get familiar with it & work the bugs out. It is very unpleasant to be offshore trying to decipher an owner's manual by flashlight! .... I'm going to haul her out for several months and then make a decision. I'll definitely talk to you guys soon. I've found more info and opinions on R.B.C. than on any other forum. And many of them are worth exactly what you pay for them! .... Have a good new year. Rob Minton And best wishes for 2006 to you. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
In article .com,
wrote: Six to eight foot waves are commonplace on the Atlantic, and are to be expected any time the wind blows 15 kts or more for over a few hours time. They are not gentle rollers either. The REALLY nasty stuff (over 20 feet) happens with winds over 35 kts for a day or so. rant Why does it seem everyone is so obsessed with withstanding "perfect" storms? Sorry, but 15 knots in open ocean is pretty much perfect conditions. The waves and swells are LONG. In my home waters, 25-30 knots is a BAD time to be out and sometimes 15 can be nasty, but my admittedly limited experience in the Atlantic off of the BVIs during the Christmas winds tells me that a properly reefed boat isn't going to have any problems at all in those conditions. Hell, Xan will gobble up those conditions for a light snack and ask for more. Yeah, I'm going to stay out of the Gulf Stream during a northerly, but that's a short part of the "pond' jump. The numerous circumnavigation logs I've studied also tell me that they most often want MORE sail due to light winds. A Chesapeake summer squall is far worse than conservative cruisers ever see on the water. /rant -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Bluewater C&C 33 - OPINIONS??
A Chesapeake summer squall
is far worse than conservative cruisers ever see on the water. Not to take anything away from a Chesapeake squall, but we are talking about crossing the North Atlantic, not conservative cruising. You've got to be able to take whatever comes along for 3 or 4 weeks, and even in June/July, the probability of making it all the way across without seeing some wind in the 30s is very low. Worse yet is the probability of seeing it sustained for a couple of days. The nice thing about squalls is that they are over in 20 or 30 minutes. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com