![]() |
|
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
As part of a non-boating-related product, my company is designing what
amounts to an automatic 500w DC self-starting gasoline battery charger. The charger is designed to be portable, unobtrusive and easy to maintain. If the battery has sufficient charge, it can self-start, but it can also be hand-started easily when necessary. It is designed to automatically start and stop as necessary to keep a battery charged. Having read postings here about cruisers running with reduced radar and lighting at night in order to conserve battery power, it occured to me that we could repackage the charger for marine use. It would be roughly shoe-box sized and effectively silent unless you were sitting next to it on a calm day. It seems like this would be useful for boats with no genset and modest electrical loads (i.e. lights & electronics). When connected to the battery it would automatically start up and and shut down as necessary to maintain the charge. It could also be designed to cooperate with external charge controllers. It seems like it would be a useful product, but I found nothing like it when I googled for obvious keywords. Does such a product already exist? Would there be any interest in such a charger? I know I have been in situations where it would have been useful. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Cool.
But, it needs to be diesel before it will get any more attention than that from many of us. I would want diesel even if it was twice as big as a shoebox and heavier. There are some small diesel engines around. I asked the question not long ago and there is a thread farther down somewhere. -- Roger Long |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Roger Long wrote:
Cool. But, it needs to be diesel before it will get any more attention than that from many of us. I would want diesel even if it was twice as big as a shoebox and heavier. There are some small diesel engines around. I asked the question not long ago and there is a thread farther down somewhere. Diesel is no problem, but probably a little louder. We can use pretty much any common internal combustion configuration if there is enough demand. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , www.synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
"Chuck Cox" wrote in message ... As part of a non-boating-related product, my company is designing what amounts to an automatic 500w DC self-starting gasoline battery charger. The charger is designed to be portable, unobtrusive and easy to maintain. If the battery has sufficient charge, it can self-start, but it can also be hand-started easily when necessary. It is designed to automatically start and stop as necessary to keep a battery charged. Having read postings here about cruisers running with reduced radar and lighting at night in order to conserve battery power, it occured to me that we could repackage the charger for marine use. It would be roughly shoe-box sized and effectively silent unless you were sitting next to it on a calm day. It seems like this would be useful for boats with no genset and modest electrical loads (i.e. lights & electronics). When connected to the battery it would automatically start up and and shut down as necessary to maintain the charge. It could also be designed to cooperate with external charge controllers. It seems like it would be a useful product, but I found nothing like it when I googled for obvious keywords. Does such a product already exist? Would there be any interest in such a charger? I know I have been in situations where it would have been useful. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. Take this device, even in prototype form, to any international boat show and you will be swamped with orders! Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
I suggest concentrating on diesel. The gas version ABSOLUTELY must
have no self starting feature for boating applications unless you have a line on amazing liability insurance. Starting a gas engine, or any other flame producing device, on a boat that carries gas must always be done after careful determination that there have been no leaks. It wouldn't be much different in any other enclosed space and that's where something like this is apt to end up. A small diesel could burn K2 which is nearly as available as gas now. -- Roger Long "Chuck Cox" wrote in message ... Roger Long wrote: Cool. But, it needs to be diesel before it will get any more attention than that from many of us. I would want diesel even if it was twice as big as a shoebox and heavier. There are some small diesel engines around. I asked the question not long ago and there is a thread farther down somewhere. Diesel is no problem, but probably a little louder. We can use pretty much any common internal combustion configuration if there is enough demand. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , www.synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
"Roger Long" wrote in message ... I suggest concentrating on diesel. The gas version ABSOLUTELY must have no self starting feature for boating applications unless you have a line on amazing liability insurance. Starting a gas engine, or any other flame producing device, on a boat that carries gas must always be done after careful determination that there have been no leaks. It wouldn't be much different in any other enclosed space and that's where something like this is apt to end up. A small diesel could burn K2 which is nearly as available as gas now. -- Roger Long Of course, you are correct Roger. Diesel would be a "must have" for this device to be marketable. Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Roger Long wrote:
I suggest concentrating on diesel. The gas version ABSOLUTELY must have no self starting feature for boating applications unless you have a line on amazing liability insurance. Starting a gas engine, or any other flame producing device, on a boat that carries gas must always be done after careful determination that there have been no leaks. It wouldn't be much different in any other enclosed space and that's where something like this is apt to end up. A small diesel could burn K2 which is nearly as available as gas now. I agree about the safety issues with gasoline and we would definitely prefer to use diesel. Regardless of the fuel source, any automatic charger would have to be deployed on deck, away from vents and fuel, never in an enclosed space. I was assuming (perhaps foolishly) that there would be a bigger market among outboard users than inboard users and therefore more demand for gasoline than diesel. I would be delighted if there were a market for a diesel version, it should be a safer and more reliable, if louder, system. We could probably make one that runs on used cooking oil. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
"Roger Long" wrote in news:ahKjf.51455$DL6.20372
@twister.nyroc.rr.com: I suggest concentrating on diesel. The gas version ABSOLUTELY must have no self starting feature for boating applications unless you have a line on amazing liability insurance. Starting a gas engine, or any other flame producing device, on a boat that carries gas must always be done after careful determination that there have been no leaks. It wouldn't be much different in any other enclosed space and that's where something like this is apt to end up. A small diesel could burn K2 which is nearly as available as gas now. I would disagree that a diesel version is an absolute requirement. This clearly has to be used above deck as there's no ventilation of exhaust fumes. Also, any boat that has diesel most likely has gasoline for dinghy motors, etc. I would also submit that most non-cruising boats don't carry spare cans of diesel, whereas they most likely have cans of gasoline. A gasoline version would be more universal between the diesel and gasoline powered vessels. -- Geoff |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Obviously a need for both versions. Cost would be a big factor for me,
Gordon "Geoff Schultz" wrote in message 6... "Roger Long" wrote in news:ahKjf.51455$DL6.20372 @twister.nyroc.rr.com: I suggest concentrating on diesel. The gas version ABSOLUTELY must have no self starting feature for boating applications unless you have a line on amazing liability insurance. Starting a gas engine, or any other flame producing device, on a boat that carries gas must always be done after careful determination that there have been no leaks. It wouldn't be much different in any other enclosed space and that's where something like this is apt to end up. A small diesel could burn K2 which is nearly as available as gas now. I would disagree that a diesel version is an absolute requirement. This clearly has to be used above deck as there's no ventilation of exhaust fumes. Also, any boat that has diesel most likely has gasoline for dinghy motors, etc. I would also submit that most non-cruising boats don't carry spare cans of diesel, whereas they most likely have cans of gasoline. A gasoline version would be more universal between the diesel and gasoline powered vessels. -- Geoff |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Geoff Schultz wrote:
I would disagree that a diesel version is an absolute requirement. This clearly has to be used above deck as there's no ventilation of exhaust fumes. Also, any boat that has diesel most likely has gasoline for dinghy motors, etc. I would also submit that most non-cruising boats don't carry spare cans of diesel, whereas they most likely have cans of gasoline. A gasoline version would be more universal between the diesel and gasoline powered vessels. This is sounding like a baby version of the Honda EU1000. Actually, one of the problems I've heard of with that is that it can't put its entire output into a charger, so I'd like to see a unit that doesn't have that problem. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Jeff wrote:
This is sounding like a baby version of the Honda EU1000. Actually, one of the problems I've heard of with that is that it can't put its entire output into a charger, so I'd like to see a unit that doesn't have that problem. While there are some similarities, there are significant differences. Our design is capable of automatically starting & stopping, so it can be left on all night. Our existing design does not incorporate an AC inverter although we could add one if there was sufficient demand. Our output is 100% DC, so all power would be available for charging. It looks like the EU1000 can only put out 100w of DC. Our design could provide 5x that continuously, in about half the space, weight & noise. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:14:08 -0500, Chuck Cox
wrote: Roger Long wrote: I suggest concentrating on diesel. The gas version ABSOLUTELY must have no self starting feature for boating applications unless you have a line on amazing liability insurance. Starting a gas engine, or any other flame producing device, on a boat that carries gas must always be done after careful determination that there have been no leaks. It wouldn't be much different in any other enclosed space and that's where something like this is apt to end up. A small diesel could burn K2 which is nearly as available as gas now. I agree about the safety issues with gasoline and we would definitely prefer to use diesel. Regardless of the fuel source, any automatic charger would have to be deployed on deck, away from vents and fuel, never in an enclosed space. I was assuming (perhaps foolishly) that there would be a bigger market among outboard users than inboard users and therefore more demand for gasoline than diesel. I would be delighted if there were a market for a diesel version, it should be a safer and more reliable, if louder, system. We could probably make one that runs on used cooking oil. I must be missing something: why would you want to install a diesel genset on the weather deck of a cruising sail boat? Being on deck means that: 1) the genset is exposed to salt spray, hence corrosion etc; and 2) its mass is high, detracting from the stability of the boat. My small (26 foot LWL) cruising sailboat has a genset made up of a 523 cc 2-cylinder 7.5 hp diesel engine driving an alternator outputting a maximum of 250 Amps of nominal 14VDC, with a permanent exhaust installation. The diesel set, with electronic speed control to suit the load demand and a three-phase voltage regulator for battery charging, consumes about 1 litre of fuel per hour. Mass is 100 kg and noise level is 80dB. Fuel fed from the installed tanks, via the usual filters. And it's below decks. And the company assembling (ie putting together the marinized diesel set, the high output alternator, voltage regulator, electronic engine speed control, etc) and marketing that unit discontinued it, due to lack of demand (ie the market is tinier than you think, Chuck, and the cost of mating together quality components is higher than buyers expect). To be used in a seaway (as opposed to in a harbor), a genset has to be sheltered, low and as close to the centerline as possible. Note also that small diesel sets do not lubricate well at the angles of heel that monohulls commonly adopt - so that puts the on-demand idea at question. Cheers Bil |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Gordon wrote:
Obviously a need for both versions. Cost would be a big factor for me, Gordon Given the low production volumes likely for such a product, it would probably cost about as much as a decent mass-produced 1000w generator. You would basically be trading output capacity for automatic operation, smaller size and less noise. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Honda used to make a 500 watt gas generator that was 12 volt or 110 volt. I
have one. I think its about 20 years old. "Chuck Cox" wrote in message ... Gordon wrote: Obviously a need for both versions. Cost would be a big factor for me, Gordon Given the low production volumes likely for such a product, it would probably cost about as much as a decent mass-produced 1000w generator. You would basically be trading output capacity for automatic operation, smaller size and less noise. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
In article ,
Chuck Cox wrote: Having read postings here about cruisers running with reduced radar and lighting at night in order to conserve battery power, it occured to me that we could repackage the charger for marine use. It would be roughly shoe-box sized and effectively silent unless you were sitting next to it on a calm day. It seems like this would be useful for boats with no genset and modest electrical loads (i.e. lights & electronics). When connected to the battery it would automatically start up and and shut down as necessary to maintain the charge. It could also be designed to cooperate with external charge controllers. About the only candidates I've seen have inefficient AC/DC refrigerators in small boats. Those with onboard A/C might find it undersized. At that, you could have sufficient market, though 500w would be huge overkill. In rough numbers, to effectively consume that much power, the boat would have at least 500 AH capacity. My 55 amp charger rarely runs as high as 20 amps for a few minutes on our 250 AH system. Even the smart charger doesn't stay that high for much longer. And it can only be used on the deck unless it's set up to be sparkless and the exhaust can be piped away from the interior, which eliminates much of the cruising crowd. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Bil wrote in news:3ebvo1lujj9hblfr8iu9g5aefpolvle9ea@
4ax.com: 250 Amps of nominal 14VDC What Ampere-Hour batteries are you charging with this much current, and not boiling them? Will the boat float that much battery weight? Some day Roger will design us a hull with "battery ballast" built into the keel, instead of the dead weigh that's down there, now. The "battery ballast" will be 5000 AH of specially-shaped cells to make the keel shape. All the thousands of pounds of weight will double as keel deadweight for sailing. As this special keel is where the batteries are located, all the space they're hogging in the boat, now, will be freed up for useful living space and storage. The "battery ballast" will be removable when the boat is hauled for easy replacement when you go to paint the bottom. They might bolt to either side of a narrow keel with a skid shoe for grounding under the "ballast batteries" without damaging them. A protective forefoot along the front of such a keel across the bow end of them would also help protect them. Being naturally water cooled along their long sides, amazing charging and discharge currents could be shoved through them without overheating, like batteries in the bilge would cooled by air. I think this would be a great use for the AGM maintenance-free wetcell technology of today......and the Toshiba 60-second-recharging Lithium-Ion cells that electric auto industry will be using in the future..... How 'bout it, Roger? Good idea? |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:19:28 -0500, Larry wrote:
Bil wrote in news:3ebvo1lujj9hblfr8iu9g5aefpolvle9ea@ 4ax.com: 250 Amps of nominal 14VDC What Ampere-Hour batteries are you charging with this much current, and not boiling them? Will the boat float that much battery weight? Battery charging is not the only use for electrical energy, Larry. But I figure you knew that. 250 A at 14VDC is the theoretical maximum output from the genset, with the diesel set at max rpm. When I specified the battery bank and genset, I wanted to take advantage of the ability of AGM batts to absorb charge fast. And the 500 Ah bank of AGMs does (although efficiency has dropped - they're 5 years old now). I think the biggest current I've seen when just battery charging is about half of the theoretical max. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
That's an incredibly cool idea. It might make a hybrid boat concept
work. You could motor under quiet electric power when you wanted maximum ambiance and have power instantly available without having to get a diesel started and warmed up. Reverse generation from freewheeling the prop under sail might be feasible. Solar, windmill, and any other power would just go into the same pot without separate systems. My mind is racing but I'm kind of busy with this boat: http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/UMDconcept.htm right now as well as the Titanic http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Titanic.htm post expedition investigation. Batteries are not all that heavy and additional ballast would be needed. So, make that keel out of 1/2 or 3/4 inch steel plate with a thicker bottom and you would have a boat that would bounce off just about anything. -- Roger Long "Larry" wrote in message ... Bil wrote in news:3ebvo1lujj9hblfr8iu9g5aefpolvle9ea@ 4ax.com: 250 Amps of nominal 14VDC What Ampere-Hour batteries are you charging with this much current, and not boiling them? Will the boat float that much battery weight? Some day Roger will design us a hull with "battery ballast" built into the keel, instead of the dead weigh that's down there, now. The "battery ballast" will be 5000 AH of specially-shaped cells to make the keel shape. All the thousands of pounds of weight will double as keel deadweight for sailing. As this special keel is where the batteries are located, all the space they're hogging in the boat, now, will be freed up for useful living space and storage. The "battery ballast" will be removable when the boat is hauled for easy replacement when you go to paint the bottom. They might bolt to either side of a narrow keel with a skid shoe for grounding under the "ballast batteries" without damaging them. A protective forefoot along the front of such a keel across the bow end of them would also help protect them. Being naturally water cooled along their long sides, amazing charging and discharge currents could be shoved through them without overheating, like batteries in the bilge would cooled by air. I think this would be a great use for the AGM maintenance-free wetcell technology of today......and the Toshiba 60-second-recharging Lithium-Ion cells that electric auto industry will be using in the future..... How 'bout it, Roger? Good idea? |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Bil wrote in news:eu70p1dt8ckcbgsi7ouhgqtdtb73nle372@
4ax.com: ability of AGM batts to absorb charge fast. Another AGM myth. An AGM battery is exactly the same as any lead-acid wetcell. It consists of the same plates, the same acid, the same chemistry, the same physics as the cheapest car battery you can buy. It's difference is the acid, instead of being a free liquid that can cool the cell, self-healing, adjustable in gravity and measurable in that gravity...it's soaked into a fiberglass mat that looks like really thin gauze and the plates, soft lead that will tolerate being rolled up tightly, is, in fact rolled up and stuffed into a plastic tube. Being rolled up tightly in fiberglass, the AGM lacks the wetcell's plate distortion problems of suspended soft lead, somewhat, and will tolerate a little higher core temperature, which it must do as there is no cooling circulation. But, when the red starting AGM in my stepvan tore itself apart and melted the red plastic case, the results were the same. Hard charging an AGM produces the same surface charge of lead plating as hard charging any lead-acid battery without the deeper plating of slow charging over hours at low current. AGM is not chemical magic or voodoo as the sales hype tries to justify the awful price. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
"Roger Long" wrote in news:LwVjf.51498$DL6.51412
@twister.nyroc.rr.com: Batteries are not all that heavy and additional ballast would be needed. So, make that keel out of 1/2 or 3/4 inch steel plate with a thicker bottom and you would have a boat that would bounce off just about anything. I was thinking of batteries in the multi-thousand-amp-hour range. Making a larger battery, of course heavier, adds to the desired ballast weight, instead of detracting from the ballast's balacing act up in the hull like we're doing it, now. The bigger/heavier the battery below fore-aft CG, the better, instead of the other way around. New battery technology makes it impossible to do any kind of maintenance on the cells, so you lose nothing in control and gain all that weight below CG. As to the recharging, these hybrid electric cars are already recovering power from their powerful dynamic braking and deceleration from the computer. This same technology could be used on the diesel-electric propulsion of the boat. The traction motor driving the hull while the engine is running is merely switched by the computer to powerful generator service as the prop pitch is adjusted by the computer to maximize shaft torque constantly during sailing under varying conditions. Current shaft alternators are just running on luck dragging water over the fixed prop not designed to be a source of power. I think a lot more power could be extracted by a computer-controlled, reversible-pitch prop we're missing out now dragging the screw through the water backwards. Hybrid vehicle research is paying for the boat propulsion systems of tomorrow, right now. That new Toshiba Lithium-Ion cell will replace all these lead-acid, nickel-cadmium/metal hydride or iron, and current Lithium-Ion technologies in such a propulsion system quite soon. The ability to recharge the keel battery packs from "dead" level to 100% in three minutes at some amazing load on the diesel genset, instead of the piddling use of diesel power with our tiny belt-driven alternators of today, is going to make electrical power much more efficient very soon. Of course, getting our "old sailing ship" sailors to overcome their nostalgia to install such technology may prove daunting. Replacing the inefficient sails with high powered wind turbines, like on the Jacque Cousteau vertical turbine ship, has a long way to go. A boat like that would have power to waste anchored in any wind. No sails would be necessary and it would power 360 degrees, even dead into the wind. Whatever happened to that odd-looking ship, anyway? I'll have to do some net searching, now that I think of it...(c; |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Jere Lull wrote:
In rough numbers, to effectively consume that much power, the boat would have at least 500 AH capacity. My 55 amp charger rarely runs as high as 20 amps for a few minutes on our 250 AH system. Even the smart charger doesn't stay that high for much longer. That's not my experience. I have 4 Trojan 6 Volts, for about 450 Amp Hours. My charge rate starts at over 100 Amps and spends a lot of time (close to an hour) over 80. When I get over 80% full the rate drops fairly fast and I shut it down below before it goes below 50 Amps. I'd rather run 5 minutes tomorrow than 10 today. If you're only charging at 20 Amps then either you're not very discharged, or the alternator or regulator is not pushing very hard. And it can only be used on the deck unless it's set up to be sparkless and the exhaust can be piped away from the interior, which eliminates much of the cruising crowd. Certainly if its automatic, a number of precautions must be taken. I would use a small genset on deck rather than run the engine, if it could actually charge at 80 Amps. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Jere Lull wrote:
In article , Chuck Cox wrote: Having read postings here about cruisers running with reduced radar and lighting at night in order to conserve battery power, it occured to me that we could repackage the charger for marine use. It would be roughly shoe-box sized and effectively silent unless you were sitting next to it on a calm day. It seems like this would be useful for boats with no genset and modest electrical loads (i.e. lights & electronics). When connected to the battery it would automatically start up and and shut down as necessary to maintain the charge. It could also be designed to cooperate with external charge controllers. About the only candidates I've seen have inefficient AC/DC refrigerators in small boats. Those with onboard A/C might find it undersized. At that, you could have sufficient market, though 500w would be huge overkill. In rough numbers, to effectively consume that much power, the boat would have at least 500 AH capacity. My 55 amp charger rarely runs as high as 20 amps for a few minutes on our 250 AH system. Even the smart charger doesn't stay that high for much longer. And it can only be used on the deck unless it's set up to be sparkless and the exhaust can be piped away from the interior, which eliminates much of the cruising crowd. To protect bilge pump power, I'd put one in the forepeak, hooked to a cell phone modem voicemessage to automatically call me and let me know the boat in Bermuda, wherever, needs attention from the marina guy. It also sounds good for camping, and recharging a battery for the trolling motor on a CL 16 in the bush, oe even a canoe, IF it had a manual - auto start off switch. I'd float the thing in a cooler on a long string if neccessary on a rainy weekend spent under a boom tent. Sailing is a way to get away, you see, and take it all with you. Sounds like a great backup for any power, short of the ship's elevator. Could even recover from a flat starting battery for a diesel too big to hand crank. Any gentleman would love to find one in his stocking. Price? I saw something like that, as big as a bladeless chainsaw, at CTC for not much. Terry K |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Bil wrote:
I must be missing something: why would you want to install a diesel genset on the weather deck of a cruising sail boat? Being on deck means that: 1) the genset is exposed to salt spray, hence corrosion etc; and 2) its mass is high, detracting from the stability of the boat. .... To be used in a seaway (as opposed to in a harbor), a genset has to be sheltered, low and as close to the centerline as possible. Note also that small diesel sets do not lubricate well at the angles of heel that monohulls commonly adopt - so that puts the on-demand idea at question. As currently envisioned, our charger should be thought of as more of an alternative to a small standalone generator, than a built-in generator like yours. You would only want to deploy it in situations where you might use a small standalone generator. There is no engineering reason why it couldn't be built-in, but I'm assuming there would be a much bigger market for a standalone unit despite the limitations. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems , , synchro.com my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Larry,
Are you talking about that trimaran with the rotating vertical cylinders ? I saw that (at least was told it was Cousteau's) at a marina up the Chickahominy R off the James R in VA maybe 8 years ago. Don't think it's there now. "Larry" wrote in message ... "Roger Long" wrote in news:LwVjf.51498$DL6.51412 @twister.nyroc.rr.com: snip Of course, getting our "old sailing ship" sailors to overcome their nostalgia to install such technology may prove daunting. Replacing the inefficient sails with high powered wind turbines, like on the Jacque Cousteau vertical turbine ship, has a long way to go. A boat like that would have power to waste anchored in any wind. No sails would be necessary and it would power 360 degrees, even dead into the wind. Whatever happened to that odd-looking ship, anyway? I'll have to do some net searching, now that I think of it...(c; |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
"Garland Gray II" wrote in
news:zD5kf.26955$ih5.3190@dukeread11: Larry, Are you talking about that trimaran with the rotating vertical cylinders ? I saw that (at least was told it was Cousteau's) at a marina up the Chickahominy R off the James R in VA maybe 8 years ago. Don't think it's there now. Yeah, that's the one. Has like 4 rotating cylinder sails that catch wind from any direction to power the boat. The vanes in it look like and S if you look down from the top of it. There was a great documentary made of it, but I can't find it. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
I was thinking the drums were perfect cylinders. Maybe not, but I thought
the principle was that wind past the rotating surface created a pressure differntial. Makes sense, but I can't think there would be much resulting force. I might drive up there some dreary day to find what happened to her. "Larry" wrote in message ... "Garland Gray II" wrote in news:zD5kf.26955$ih5.3190@dukeread11: Larry, Are you talking about that trimaran with the rotating vertical cylinders ? I saw that (at least was told it was Cousteau's) at a marina up the Chickahominy R off the James R in VA maybe 8 years ago. Don't think it's there now. Yeah, that's the one. Has like 4 rotating cylinder sails that catch wind from any direction to power the boat. The vanes in it look like and S if you look down from the top of it. There was a great documentary made of it, but I can't find it. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
"Garland Gray II" wrote in
news:PC7kf.26965$ih5.11538@dukeread11: I was thinking the drums were perfect cylinders. Maybe not, but I thought the principle was that wind past the rotating surface created a pressure differntial. Makes sense, but I can't think there would be much resulting force. I might drive up there some dreary day to find what happened to her. No, the "vanes" are, looking at them from the end, cup shaped between the outer and center, I think. It would make sense if the shape of each of them were a vertical wing on Bernoulli's Principal with lift as it goes by the proper wind angle for lift (rotation power). |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:40:43 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: right now as well as the Titanic http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Titanic.htm post expedition investigation. ====================================== Roger, you are quoted on CNN tonight regarding the Titanic: http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science....ap/index.html |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
You mean "miss-quoted".
I've been getting calls from reporters as far away as Norway and Brazil. It's nice to be able to chase them away quickly by telling them I'm under a non-disclosure agreement. Otherwise, I'd be doing nothing but talking on the phone. It's a much better story than the press items indicate. It's going to be a super show. Don't miss it. February 26. -- Roger Long "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:40:43 GMT, "Roger Long" wrote: right now as well as the Titanic http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Titanic.htm post expedition investigation. ====================================== Roger, you are quoted on CNN tonight regarding the Titanic: http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science....ap/index.html |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
The vanes in it look like and S if
you look down from the top of it. There was a great documentary made of it, but I can't find it. I rememebr the article in Popular Mechanics, or Popular Science several years ago. it was interesting indeed! |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:26:43 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: You mean "miss-quoted". I've been getting calls from reporters as far away as Norway and Brazil. It's nice to be able to chase them away quickly by telling them I'm under a non-disclosure agreement. Otherwise, I'd be doing nothing but talking on the phone. It's a much better story than the press items indicate. It's going to be a super show. Don't miss it. February 26. Good for you, Roger. Nice to see a "local boy" newsgroup poster in the news in a situation that doesn't involve getting hoisted off a deck by a helicopter's winch... R. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:26:43 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: You mean "miss-quoted". I've been getting calls from reporters as far away as Norway and Brazil. It's nice to be able to chase them away quickly by telling them I'm under a non-disclosure agreement. Otherwise, I'd be doing nothing but talking on the phone. ================================ My experience is that the press hardly ever gets it right when dealing with technical topics, makes you wonder about the others. Only the Wall Street Journal even comes close in my opinion. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Yes, this is an old thread coming back to life...
Back in December I wrote: As part of a non-boating-related product, my company is designing what amounts to an automatic 500w DC self-starting gasoline battery charger. The charger is designed to be portable, unobtrusive and easy to maintain. If the battery has sufficient charge, it can self-start, but it can also be hand-started easily when necessary. It is designed to automatically start and stop as necessary to keep a battery charged. Having read postings here about cruisers running with reduced radar and lighting at night in order to conserve battery power, it occured to me that we could repackage the charger for marine use. It would be roughly shoe-box sized and effectively silent unless you were sitting next to it on a calm day. It seems like this would be useful for boats with no genset and modest electrical loads (i.e. lights & electronics). When connected to the battery it would automatically start up and and shut down as necessary to maintain the charge. It could also be designed to cooperate with external charge controllers. It seems like it would be a useful product, but I found nothing like it when I googled for obvious keywords. Does such a product already exist? Would there be any interest in such a charger? I know I have been in situations where it would have been useful. Roger Long and several others then made very convincing arguments that diesel would be the best fuel for this product. Well, my partner has found an appropriate diesel motor and electric motor/generator. We are putting together a test stand now and should get some real-world data soon. My partner insists that lubrication is not a problem at any angle of heel, but that is one thing we'll be taking a hard look at. There are a couple of major variables that I'm still unclear on: how it will get fuel and where it will be located. For fuel, I'm wondering if it would be preferable to have its own fuel tank or to connect to the main fuel system. For location, it could be a stand-alone unit that you put on deck to operate, or a built-in unit that could operate without getting in the way. Clearly these two issues are inter-related. My original idea was to make it stand-alone with its own fuel tank. By using a small fuel pump, we can locate the fuel tank beside the motor instead of on top like most generators. This would make for a low-profile package that would be less intrusive than a typical generator, but you'd still have one more thing on deck to trip over. So, if you were to put such a system on your boat, what would you prefer? -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems - Synchro.com , my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Chuck Cox wrote:
Yes, this is an old thread coming back to life... [snip] Roger Long and several others then made very convincing arguments that diesel would be the best fuel for this product. Well, my partner has found an appropriate diesel motor and electric motor/generator. We are putting together a test stand now and should get some real-world data soon. My partner insists that lubrication is not a problem at any angle of heel, but that is one thing we'll be taking a hard look at. There are a couple of major variables that I'm still unclear on: how it will get fuel and where it will be located. For fuel, I'm wondering if it would be preferable to have its own fuel tank or to connect to the main fuel system. For location, it could be a stand-alone unit that you put on deck to operate, or a built-in unit that could operate without getting in the way. Clearly these two issues are inter-related. My original idea was to make it stand-alone with its own fuel tank. By using a small fuel pump, we can locate the fuel tank beside the motor instead of on top like most generators. This would make for a low-profile package that would be less intrusive than a typical generator, but you'd still have one more thing on deck to trip over. So, if you were to put such a system on your boat, what would you prefer? i think this is a good idea. in battery based electrical systems there has always been a giant gap that needs to be filled in the area of battery charging with fuel based generators. with solar panels you get a small charge going into your bank, the same with wind generation, usually upwards to 200 or 300 watts if you are extremely fortunate. but if you want to use a fuel based system you've always had to step up to suddenly wasting incredible amounts of fuel to run an alternator that is very inefficient at charging batteries for the amount of fuel wasted doing it, and there's not been a generator that is down in the "few hundred watt" range that would make better use of fuel. battery banks can only accept a certain amount of power, and a 5000 watt generator might as well be a 500 watt generator because you can't charge the batteries any faster than using a few hundred watts anyway, so you're just wasting energy for nothing. nobody has ever bothered to make and sell an inexpensive small diesel generator designed to charge a battery bank, at least not that i've ever seen. cruisers are interested in the measurement "battery bank watt hours created per liter of fuel", and i'm not aware of any manufacturer that has ever thought about it that way. most generator makers just think of "watts generated per liter", which isn't the same thing at all. so i think this is a great idea for a product, one that's been needed for a long time. a fuel based battery charger, especially great in diesel, that will not make a pile of noise, won't generate more than a few hundred watts of power, and efficiently turns fuel into battery charge. what's not to like about that. i would think that hooking it into the fuel line for the engine's fuel tank would be the preferred way, but why not make the external tank an option ? that way you can decide for yourself when you buy one if you want the tank or if you want a piece of fuel line and a T adapter. diesel is definitely the way to go, storage of gasoline is a problem. it would be nice if it used fuel filters that you can get at the same time as the ones for your marine engine without special ordering. and also remote start so you can mount the starter switch where ever you want it. |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
In article , Chuck Cox
wrote: Yes, this is an old thread coming back to life... Back in December I wrote: As part of a non-boating-related product, my company is designing what amounts to an automatic 500w DC self-starting gasoline battery charger. The charger is designed to be portable, unobtrusive and easy to maintain. If the battery has sufficient charge, it can self-start, but it can also be hand-started easily when necessary. It is designed to automatically start and stop as necessary to keep a battery charged. Having read postings here about cruisers running with reduced radar and lighting at night in order to conserve battery power, it occured to me that we could repackage the charger for marine use. It would be roughly shoe-box sized and effectively silent unless you were sitting next to it on a calm day. It seems like this would be useful for boats with no genset and modest electrical loads (i.e. lights & electronics). When connected to the battery it would automatically start up and and shut down as necessary to maintain the charge. It could also be designed to cooperate with external charge controllers. It seems like it would be a useful product, but I found nothing like it when I googled for obvious keywords. Does such a product already exist? Would there be any interest in such a charger? I know I have been in situations where it would have been useful. Roger Long and several others then made very convincing arguments that diesel would be the best fuel for this product. Well, my partner has found an appropriate diesel motor and electric motor/generator. We are putting together a test stand now and should get some real-world data soon. My partner insists that lubrication is not a problem at any angle of heel, but that is one thing we'll be taking a hard look at. There are a couple of major variables that I'm still unclear on: how it will get fuel and where it will be located. For fuel, I'm wondering if it would be preferable to have its own fuel tank or to connect to the main fuel system. For location, it could be a stand-alone unit that you put on deck to operate, or a built-in unit that could operate without getting in the way. Clearly these two issues are inter-related. My original idea was to make it stand-alone with its own fuel tank. By using a small fuel pump, we can locate the fuel tank beside the motor instead of on top like most generators. This would make for a low-profile package that would be less intrusive than a typical generator, but you'd still have one more thing on deck to trip over. So, if you were to put such a system on your boat, what would you prefer? Depends. Is this going to be water cooled or air cooled? If water cooled, sea water or fresh water with radiator or via heat exchanger? I'm assuming air cooled as this is simplest for an engine. However, it may be noisy and need access to ventilation so belowdecks may not be ideal. My preference would be for an integral tank that gravity-feeds the engine. This is simplest and therefore cheapest. You can always use it as a day tank and fill via dedicated line from the main tank, or rig up a float switch to kick in a pump. I too think this is a good idea and if the price was right, would buy one. We built something similar to use on an island once, but it was petrol powered and quite noisy, plus relatively inefficient. Used a motorcycle permanent magnet alternator. PDW |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
"purple_stars" wrote in
oups.com: and a 5000 watt generator might as well be a 500 watt generator because you can't charge the batteries any faster than using a few hundred watts anyway, so you're just wasting energy for nothing. Ahhh....a refreshing voice of SENSE in the background noise..... A solution might be: http://www.hondapowerequipment.com/M...elName=eu1000i I love mine. We took it to sea and out on local cruises many times. It's so quiet and so easy on fuel. With its 12V 8A internal charger hooked to the 12V bus plus the boat's dual 10A Guest charger running off its rock-solid 60 Hz, 120VAC inverter power, it never left its low-speed econo mode until someone lit off the microwave. The .6 US Gallon tank easily runs 8 hours with that kind of load. I don't know what it runs on that lean. The fuel system is sealed tight once you've shut off the vent in the cap to store it, too. I used it as a shop heater inside the stepvan when it's cold in winter, in addition to a power supply. I welded a galvanized pipe nipple to the little nubbin of an outlet on the muffler so I could connect some copper tubing to the exhaust. The tubing is left in a coil that radiates heat like mad before the cold exhaust dripping with moisture is fed through a hole in the truck's floor outside. This way, I recover nearly 100% of the energy from the little fuel tank as heat or power. The cooling air recycles inside the truck and doesn't set off my CO alarm, at all. Sure makes the shop toasty warm on a cold morning for a little mechanical noise and a tiny bit of gas...(c; It's a Honda, so it always starts on the first easy pull..... Anchored with it on the bow, you can hardly hear it running inside the cabin. At sea with it running on the stern and the exhaust pointed aft, it makes about the same noise as the waves....Just bungie the big handle to the stern rail by the beer cooler... I've also connected its DC charging output directly to a thermoelectric ice chest, just to see how it will pull that load. It's not made for this service, but the Igloo DC cooler doesn't seem to mind. If anything, the fan runs a little faster than it does on a battery. The voltage open circuit is around 17VDC but drops fast from its internal resistance when the load comes on. It's not regulated or filtered, just rectified high frequency, multiphase AC off the flywheel coil banks that run it all.... |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
"Chuck Cox" wrote in message ... Yes, this is an old thread coming back to life... Back in December I wrote: As part of a non-boating-related product, my company is designing what amounts to an automatic 500w DC self-starting gasoline battery charger. The charger is designed to be portable, unobtrusive and easy to maintain. If the battery has sufficient charge, it can self-start, but it can also be hand-started easily when necessary. It is designed to automatically start and stop as necessary to keep a battery charged. I've used petrol gennys for charging (not auto) and like the idea, and also agree the preference for diesel. Nice if it's portable - but that means air cooling - usually noisier. One factor you haven't mentioned is the desirability of charging at the maximum feasible rate (minimum running time). Perhaps you've already got that idea in mind. Just in case you haven't, I achieved best results charging by taking my (European) 240v through an intelligent charger, one that sensed battery voltage direct, and delivered up to 14.4v (variable depending on battery type) stepping to 13.6v once the main charge had been delivered (there was also a 16v option for de-sulphating the batteries. Add water afterwards!). A shortcoming of most petrol gennys on the market which supply 12v nominal is that they're usually regulated to 13.4v or so maximum, which gives a very slow re-charge once you reach 75% or so of battery capacity. Especially if you're pumping it down a long line .. . . JimB |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
purple_stars wrote:
if you want to use a fuel based system you've always had to step up to suddenly wasting incredible amounts of fuel to run an alternator that is very inefficient at charging batteries for the amount of fuel wasted doing it, and there's not been a generator that is down in the "few hundred watt" range that would make better use of fuel. battery banks can only accept a certain amount of power, and a 5000 watt generator might as well be a 500 watt generator because you can't charge the batteries any faster than using a few hundred watts anyway, so you're just wasting energy for nothing. nobody has ever bothered to make and sell an inexpensive small diesel generator designed to charge a battery bank, at least not that i've ever seen. cruisers are interested in the measurement "battery bank watt hours created per liter of fuel", and i'm not aware of any manufacturer that has ever thought about it that way. most generator makers just think of "watts generated per liter", which isn't the same thing at all. That is exactly our thinking too. By optimizing the system for charging only, we can maximize efficiency. Our biggest advantage is that we have a fixed load and can optimize the system for a very narrow operating range in terms of speed and power. Although we are using an off-the-shelf motor, we expect to use custom induction & exhaust systems in order to maximize efficiency and minimize noise and size. i would think that hooking it into the fuel line for the engine's fuel tank would be the preferred way, but why not make the external tank an option ? that way you can decide for yourself when you buy one if you want the tank or if you want a piece of fuel line and a T adapter. As a small business, we can only afford to design, manufacture and support one configuration initially. I'm trying to figure out which configuration would be our best first shot. diesel is definitely the way to go, storage of gasoline is a problem. it would be nice if it used fuel filters that you can get at the same time as the ones for your marine engine without special ordering. Our intention is to use as many off-the-shelf components as possible. However, most of the parts probably won't be found in a typical marine catalog because I don't think there are too many 1 hp marine diesel-electric applications. For example, I suspect any fuel filter or fuel pump you find in a marine catalog is going to be far too large for our application. The upside is that you won't have to pay marine prices for replacement parts. and also remote start so you can mount the starter switch where ever you want it. There really won't be a "Start" button. There will only be "On/Off" and the charger will decide when to start and stop. When you suggest this feature, are you thinking of a built-in or stand-alone configuation? I think this would be required in a built-in configuration, but for a stand-alone configuration, I'm inclined to forgoe the additional expense unless it provides a significant benefit. Thanks for your feedback. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems - Synchro.com , my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
Peter Wiley wrote:
Depends. Is this going to be water cooled or air cooled? If water cooled, sea water or fresh water with radiator or via heat exchanger? Air cooled. I'm assuming air cooled as this is simplest for an engine. However, it may be noisy and need access to ventilation so belowdecks may not be ideal. The noise will be minimized since we can optimize the induction/exhaust system for one fundamental frequency and amplitude. However, you are right that it will make noise and require ventilation. I am particularly concerned about exhaust gases. A built-in system would almost certainly be more expensive to design and support, so we'd need to see sufficient demand to justify it. My preference would be for an integral tank that gravity-feeds the engine. This is simplest and therefore cheapest. You can always use it as a day tank and fill via dedicated line from the main tank, or rig up a float switch to kick in a pump. Does the higher profile of a gravity-fed system matter to you? Where would you envision operating such a system on your boat? Thanks for the feedback. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems - Synchro.com , my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK |
500w self-starting DC generator anyone?
News f2s wrote:
I've used petrol gennys for charging (not auto) and like the idea, and also agree the preference for diesel. Nice if it's portable - but that means air cooling - usually noisier. On the other hand, since we will be operating at only one speed, we can optimize our noise reduction, so it will be quieter than a variable-speed motor. One factor you haven't mentioned is the desirability of charging at the maximum feasible rate (minimum running time). Perhaps you've already got that idea in mind. Yes, the system is designed to operate at an optimal output power. It should only start when the batteries are low enough to take a full charge and shutdown when the load drops. It isn't designed to do trickle or variable charging. Just in case you haven't, I achieved best results charging by taking my (European) 240v through an intelligent charger, one that sensed battery voltage direct, and delivered up to 14.4v (variable depending on battery type) stepping to 13.6v once the main charge had been delivered (there was also a 16v option for de-sulphating the batteries. Add water afterwards!). This brings up another question; should we incorporate an intelligent charger or should we interface with an existing external charger? If your batteries are already connected to a charging system, it will only confuse things if we try to operate two independent changing systems simultaneously. My assumption is that most potential users of this charger already have a charging system onboard. Is this a valid assumption? I have no experience with off-the-shelf marine chargers, can they even be interfaced with an external power source? A shortcoming of most petrol gennys on the market which supply 12v nominal is that they're usually regulated to 13.4v or so maximum, which gives a very slow re-charge once you reach 75% or so of battery capacity. Especially if you're pumping it down a long line . . . Because of the binary nature of our system, we don't intend on taking the batteries to full charge, just to the point where they can no longer take full charging current. This is the most efficient way to operate our system since it is optimized to deliver a specific output power and will lose efficiency at lower output levels. -- Chuck Cox - SynchroSystems - Synchro.com , my email is politician-proof, just remove the PORK |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com