| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 6 Oct 2005 08:56:02 -0500, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:23:11 GMT, Brian Whatcott said: I try to avoid getting dragged into the substance of playground arguments in which I have no horse in the race. Hmmm, by my count, Rosalie stacked up 11 contributions, and Dave was close behind with 9 to this playg...er.. thread. And how many of those 9 argued for or against the proposition that melting lead to make a sounding lead would create lead dust, as opposed to the validity of the argument being made for that proposition. I used the phrase "the substance of" for good reason. The distinction is apparently too subtle for your comprehension. Hmmm....not only willing to conduct an extensive two-way ..er.. dialog, but able to make distinctions too subtle for my comprehension.... That will show me - for importing actual data of the numeric or scientific kind into this very special dialog. Brian Whatcott |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sea kayak, ballast, use of lead blankets, just an observation | General | |||
| Sea kayak, ballast, use of lead blankets, just an observation | Touring | |||
| Deep cycle batteries - miscellaneous advice? | Electronics | |||
| DAMMIT ICOM WHY SO CHEAP?!! | Electronics | |||
| Adding lead ballast | Boat Building | |||