Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that if you buy a boat, you directly ask the surveyor his
opinion on whether or not the blisters are a structural issue. I have owned two boats with blisters. The first I repaired by drying for 3 months and then grinding them out and filling with epoxy and then several epoxy barrier coats (I know, not the same as a gelcoat peel) and when it looked beautiful, it went back in the water and all my work was hidden. A total waste of time as none of the blisters was into the lam. The inside of the boat showed no problems at all. My current boat has some blisters and my strategy is to repair any that look bad and ignore the others. I had a surveyor look over the boat (not a real survey) for insurance purposes recently and he stated "No obvious blisters" even though I had seen them . I think that if a boat is over 20 yrs old and the blisters have not becom a structural prob, they arent likely to ever be. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would not hesitate to use the presence of blisters as a bargaining
tool if I was buying a boat but also would not let their presence keep me from buying. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
260 Defiance, not that dissimilar to a Parker | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
The future of yacht design - 10 myths scotched | ASA |