Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 16 Jun 2005 15:23:32 -0700, "tigerregis"
wrote: Back to the Grampian vs Bayfield beginning. Having sailed both, one down the ditch, I mailed directly to Mic, the original poster. I received two mail watchers replies that his site was not going to be able to respond to me, because there is "something" wrong there.and my AV detected it. I went back to the thread and Mic never came back. I am new to this and neither want to cause a problem or be one.Any comments? Yep I still participate in the newsgroup, normally that is where you should post your comments/responses. A sort of "share the knowledge" puropse and concept of Usenet. Many email address are "munged" distorted so as to not get farmed and used to spam you with unwanted email solicitations. Many contribute to usenet in a positive way. Others just see it as a place to be nasty. What I havent figured out is if it take more work to be nasty than nice, why is it that some want to do more unproductive work? Go figure... Thats great that you actually sailed a Grampian 26 and been on a Bayfield 25, both are common and totally different as distinguised by their rudders and keels, which significantly effect the manner in which they work best and worst. I have heard that a B25 circumnavigated, but havent seen any logs or data as such. The B25 claims to have 3/8 balsa in the vberth, now is that actually in the hull. The infor that I have is not clear on that. I know the cabin trunk is balsa cored. But the info. that I have refers to balsa core somewhere other than in the deck, namely somewhere else, in particular in the vberth???? TIA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Off Topic Posting Has Finally Hit Its Inevitable Bottom. | General | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | Cruising | |||
??? | General | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | ASA | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | General |