Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mic wrote:
.... It was stated that about 93% of the time the winds are between 13-17 knots and for the remaining 7% of the time - 97% of that time they are between 17-21 knots. It may have been "stated" but that doesn't make it true or meaningful. The above statement can be said about anthing. But If you take your own experience and that of others from their logs then come to your own conclusion on its relative truth or meaningfulness. I think just about all of the readers here would think the the maximum gust strength in more significant than the average wind strength. In many locations, the average summer wind could be offered as proof that sailing is physically impossible! First of all, the "average" wind varies a fair amount by location and season, so any statistical claim such as that is just nonsense. Yep. The reputation of the tasman sea is an example or the north atlantic. But the trade winds are different and the pacific "milk run"... In all of those cases you'll encounter winds stronger than your implied average. .... Interesting link http://web.usna.navy.mil/~phmiller/usna1.html lots of neat stuff there ... anything in particular? In fact, if you just look at the record gusts, you'll find that most cities in the US have had high gusts (over 40 knots) in almost every month of the year. Thus, any permanently rigged dodger has to be able handle that. Yep, although I have never seen a claim by any maker of tests to and of their dodgers., why? Its a little hard - there are too many variables. And if no one does it, there's no reason for anyone to do it. Actually, I expect the various components of the dodger are warrantied for manufacturing flaws, such as stitching coming out, but there are very few products covered for hurricane damage. My standard is 50 knots - that is, when I leave the boat unattended, I assume that it can withstand gusts up to about 50 knots. Above that point, I might consider adding docklines or removing canvas. Designing something to "average winds" is silly. Yep, but designed to force 5 huricanes, it that practical or common. No, obviously at some point it is prudent to remove the canvas. However, you made comments that seemed to imply that wind over 21 knots is so uncommon as to be not worth considering. The one time my boat was in the the direct path of a hurricane (Bob, '91, but diminished to marginal hurricane strength) I stripped all sail and canvas. However, of the 350 boats on my marina, few stripped everything and there was only minor damage. Clearly, most of the dodgers were built to at least minimal hurricane strength. My cousin's boat was carried a mile inland and had to be lifted out by helicopter, but the dodger survived. Actually, for the case of a dodger, its probably your brother-in-law falling into it that you have to worry about. The frame should be at least strong enough to hold a person; ideally it should be able to withstand a person falling heavily against it. Probably, but I doubt any standard commercial dodger would survive a 200lbs person in all situations without damage. Many are built to hold the weight of a full sized person hanging from it as they go down the companionway. I doubt a pvc frame would hold that. Actually, this situation is probably the key issue of this discussion. .... How many boats have the ready provision for emerg. steering? I only know of one production boat as such. Why dont they have that, is almost common sense, (common sense isnt so common:{} ) Most are of a homebrew design. either as foresights or as required. My boat has two (potentially) independent rudder systems, with provision for an emergency tiller on either. My previous boat, and many quality boats with wheel steering, has provision for an emergency tiller. Beyond that, I'm not sure what the value of true emergency steering is, given that 99% of boats almost never leave SeaTow range. Would a Catalina 30 buyer pay a few thousand extra for this capability? Wind vane self steering is useful for long distance passage makers, and for them, a fully redundant backup rudder is handy, but this is an after market issue. Frankly, if I were building a boat specifically for long distance passages, I'd want to minimize the chance of damage, with a heavy duty rudder mounted on skeg. I have researched virtually all the sailing homebrew material available: ... The common aspect of of most of the "home brew" techniques is that they have been proven worthless. For example, how many home built ferro-cement boats are still sailing? That is an exception example. No, that's right up there with poly sails and pvc davits. And don't forget pepper in bottom paint. .... Stitch and glue is a homebrew tech. and is accepted as a commonly acceptable tech. etc. This is one exception I was thinking of. However, its only useful for small boats. Home many blue poly sails do you see? Well, not many. But they are mostly on 18footer or less. Ususally the stitch and glue dingys.... but the knowledge and tech. could be applied in certain situations... an those that have used them would have spent more on sails than in the construction of their boat. If your goal is to prove that that you can make a mediocre (at best) boat for pocket change, fine. And I'll even admit that the first boat I built had a sail made from an old bedsheet. However, sailcloth is about a buck a square foot. Spinnaker cloth is even less. So what do you save? 50 bucks? If I'm going to sit at the sewing machine for a few hours, plus put in a mess of grommets, I'd rather spend the $50 and have something I'm proud of. There are a few notable exceptions, but most of the home brew building materials are junk. Why don't you see blue poly dodgers? Because most people understand that the materials are only about 20% of the value of the project. Most of the value is in the craft of assembly and finish. Why would anyone use third rate materials for something that takes a lot of manual labor? Yep. This can be applied to production boats. Refer to Bob Pascoe website. Actually, I'd say that most of Pascoe's horrible examples are a big step up from poly dodgers. I will admit that I chartered an Irwin for a season (that was the Hurricane Bob boat) and it was such a POS that my subsequent two boats were from high quality manufacturers. .... I have heard and seen many boaters using PVC and blue poly tarps for their winter covers. Now the tarps may only last a season or two, but no one, that I know of has had an issue with the PVC supports other than the tech. they used to secure them to the boat. Some tent poles are made of fiberglass and it is amazing how much they bend, I haven seen or heard of one breaking but thats not to say they dont. Look at the condition on Everest, and the material that are used, sort of like a fixed sail on land. Well, of course a blue poly tarp is not a bad winter sail cover, I've even used them for a few seasons. But isn't that a case of using a material for it's actual designed purpose? Most shrink wrap frames around here are built from very cheap wood strapping. PVC, conduit, or almost anything else is a step up. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:25:36 -0400, Jeff wrote:
Mic wrote: ... It was stated that about 93% of the time the winds are between 13-17 knots and for the remaining 7% of the time - 97% of that time they are between 17-21 knots. It may have been "stated" but that doesn't make it true or meaningful. The above statement can be said about anthing. But If you take your own experience and that of others from their logs then come to your own conclusion on its relative truth or meaningfulness. I think just about all of the readers here would think the the maximum gust strength in more significant than the average wind strength. yep..a gust is not sustained winds. In many locations, the average summer wind could be offered as proof that sailing is physically impossible! I really cant think of any, where would you suggest? First of all, the "average" wind varies a fair amount by location and season, so any statistical claim such as that is just nonsense. Yep. The reputation of the tasman sea is an example or the north atlantic. But the trade winds are different and the pacific "milk run"... In all of those cases you'll encounter winds stronger than your implied average. Yep thats why I mentioned them, and other than the "horn" and the tip of south africa, well the artics too...relative to the vastness of the ocean, I dont consider that alot. How many people do you see go out when it is 30 knots sustained. Near zero. ... Interesting link http://web.usna.navy.mil/~phmiller/usna1.html lots of neat stuff there ... anything in particular? Yes....Stiffness Reduction of Marine Composites http://web.usna.navy.mil/~phmiller/J...24fatigue.html In fact, if you just look at the record gusts, you'll find that most cities in the US have had high gusts (over 40 knots) in almost every month of the year. Thus, any permanently rigged dodger has to be able handle that. Yep, although I have never seen a claim by any maker of tests to and of their dodgers., why? Its a little hard - there are too many variables. And if no one does it, there's no reason for anyone to do it. Actually, I expect the various components of the dodger are warrantied for manufacturing flaws, such as stitching coming out, but there are very few products covered for hurricane damage. Right...so it all kind of relative and somewhat subjective. My standard is 50 knots - that is, when I leave the boat unattended, I assume that it can withstand gusts up to about 50 knots. Above that point, I might consider adding docklines or removing canvas. Designing something to "average winds" is silly. Yep, but designed to force 5 huricanes, it that practical or common. No, obviously at some point it is prudent to remove the canvas. However, you made comments that seemed to imply that wind over 21 knots is so uncommon as to be not worth considering. No actually that is what is the most worth considering, but am of the opinion that it is not a frequent stat., "sustained" winds over 21 knots, geographic exceptions noted. The one time my boat was in the the direct path of a hurricane (Bob, '91, but diminished to marginal hurricane strength) I stripped all sail and canvas. However, of the 350 boats on my marina, few stripped everything and there was only minor damage. Clearly, most of the dodgers were built to at least minimal hurricane strength. My cousin's boat was carried a mile inland and had to be lifted out by helicopter, but the dodger survived. Actually, for the case of a dodger, its probably your brother-in-law falling into it that you have to worry about. The frame should be at least strong enough to hold a person; ideally it should be able to withstand a person falling heavily against it. Probably, but I doubt any standard commercial dodger would survive a 200lbs person in all situations without damage. Many are built to hold the weight of a full sized person hanging from it as they go down the companionway. I doubt a pvc frame would hold that. Actually, this situation is probably the key issue of this discussion. Actually I prefer ABS...If I have the time and material handy,,,I might like to do some tests.. ... How many boats have the ready provision for emerg. steering? I only know of one production boat as such. Why dont they have that, is almost common sense, (common sense isnt so common:{} ) Most are of a homebrew design. either as foresights or as required. My boat has two (potentially) independent rudder systems, with provision for an emergency tiller on either. My previous boat, and many quality boats with wheel steering, has provision for an emergency tiller. Yes, but not rudder.... I have seen a "homebrew" pindel and grudeon rudder that worked like a cassette. The cassette was inserted to the grudeons and then the rudder through the cassette - very cool.....so easy and cheap to make. By using this cassette method is ingenious,,,,as trying to install a rudder in full on rough conditions might be more of a challenge. Beyond that, I'm not sure what the value of true emergency steering is, given that 99% of boats almost never leave SeaTow range. Would a Catalina 30 buyer pay a few thousand extra for this capability? Wind vane self steering is useful for long distance passage makers, and for them, a fully redundant backup rudder is handy, but this is an after market issue. Frankly, if I were building a boat specifically for long distance passages, I'd want to minimize the chance of damage, with a heavy duty rudder mounted on skeg. Would that be "balanced"? If so How? Well thats really another topic "rudders and keels". I see a lot of spade rudders out there....at least the boats I am noticing. I have researched virtually all the sailing homebrew material available: ... The common aspect of of most of the "home brew" techniques is that they have been proven worthless. For example, how many home built ferro-cement boats are still sailing? That is an exception example. No, that's right up there with poly sails and pvc davits. And don't forget pepper in bottom paint. Havent seen the pvc davits anywhere.....yet;}} ... Stitch and glue is a homebrew tech. and is accepted as a commonly acceptable tech. etc. This is one exception I was thinking of. However, its only useful for small boats. Home many blue poly sails do you see? Well, not many. But they are mostly on 18footer or less. Ususally the stitch and glue dingys.... but the knowledge and tech. could be applied in certain situations... an those that have used them would have spent more on sails than in the construction of their boat. If your goal is to prove that that you can make a mediocre (at best) boat for pocket change, fine. And I'll even admit that the first boat I built had a sail made from an old bedsheet. However, sailcloth is about a buck a square foot. Spinnaker cloth is even less. So what do you save? 50 bucks? If I'm going to sit at the sewing machine for a few hours, plus put in a mess of grommets, I'd rather spend the $50 and have something I'm proud of. Actually I dont think many of the polys are sewn,,,,and your going to like the fact that some use carpet tape. There are a few notable exceptions, but most of the home brew building materials are junk. Why don't you see blue poly dodgers? Because most people understand that the materials are only about 20% of the value of the project. Most of the value is in the craft of assembly and finish. Why would anyone use third rate materials for something that takes a lot of manual labor? Yep. This can be applied to production boats. Refer to Bob Pascoe website. Actually, I'd say that most of Pascoe's horrible examples are a big step up from poly dodgers. I would not use poly on a dodger...never said I would. The point I was making was regarding you statement "Why would anyone use third rate materials for something that takes a lot of manual labor?" Was the fact of the state of build of many production boats apply to your comment and can not just be directed at homebrew projects. I will admit that I chartered an Irwin for a season (that was the Hurricane Bob boat) and it was such a POS that my subsequent two boats were from high quality manufacturers. ... I have heard and seen many boaters using PVC and blue poly tarps for their winter covers. Now the tarps may only last a season or two, but no one, that I know of has had an issue with the PVC supports other than the tech. they used to secure them to the boat. Some tent poles are made of fiberglass and it is amazing how much they bend, I haven seen or heard of one breaking but thats not to say they dont. Look at the condition on Everest, and the material that are used, sort of like a fixed sail on land. Well, of course a blue poly tarp is not a bad winter sail cover, I've even used them for a few seasons. But isn't that a case of using a material for it's actual designed purpose? Most shrink wrap frames around here are built from very cheap wood strapping. PVC, conduit, or almost anything else is a step up. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mic wrote:
In many locations, the average summer wind could be offered as proof that sailing is physically impossible! I really cant think of any, where would you suggest? The average wind in Myrtle Beach in August is 4 knots. Yep. The reputation of the tasman sea is an example or the north atlantic. But the trade winds are different and the pacific "milk run"... In all of those cases you'll encounter winds stronger than your implied average. Yep thats why I mentioned them, and other than the "horn" and the tip of south africa, well the artics too...relative to the vastness of the ocean, I dont consider that alot. But do you actually have a point to this? How many people do you see go out when it is 30 knots sustained. Near zero. This is total nonsense. While I don't often leave the dock in high winds, at least once a year I find myself out in strong winds. Last year's episode had lighter wind than our normal max - it was about 30 but on the stern - it was the 10+ foot confused sea that annoyed my wife. And for a dodger, it isn't the wind while sailing that counts, the wind at the dock can be just as bad. A few days after I launched this year we had gusts to about 50. .... No, obviously at some point it is prudent to remove the canvas. However, you made comments that seemed to imply that wind over 21 knots is so uncommon as to be not worth considering. No actually that is what is the most worth considering, but am of the opinion that it is not a frequent stat., "sustained" winds over 21 knots, geographic exceptions noted. I have no idea what you're trying to say ... .... How many boats have the ready provision for emerg. steering? I only know of one production boat as such. Why dont they have that, is almost common sense, (common sense isnt so common:{} ) Most are of a homebrew design. either as foresights or as required. My boat has two (potentially) independent rudder systems, with provision for an emergency tiller on either. My previous boat, and many quality boats with wheel steering, has provision for an emergency tiller. Yes, but not rudder.... As I said, my current boat has two complete systems, including two rudders. I have seen a "homebrew" pindel and grudeon rudder that worked like a cassette. The cassette was inserted to the grudeons and then the rudder through the cassette - very cool.....so easy and cheap to make. By using this cassette method is ingenious,,,,as trying to install a rudder in full on rough conditions might be more of a challenge. Don't a number of dinghies use this arrangement? Frankly, if I were building a boat specifically for long distance passages, I'd want to minimize the chance of damage, with a heavy duty rudder mounted on skeg. Would that be "balanced"? If so How? Nope, it wouldn't be balanced. That's a nice attribute, but not necessary. If you're considering scenarios where you need to replace the rudder underway, you probably need a protected rudder more than a balanced one. Well thats really another topic "rudders and keels". I see a lot of spade rudders out there....at least the boats I am noticing. But its leads you to worrying about emergency rudders. This is not the path of simplicity. No, that's right up there with poly sails and pvc davits. And don't forget pepper in bottom paint. Havent seen the pvc davits anywhere.....yet;}} Fortunately, they haven't caught on, but I've seen a few. .... However, sailcloth is about a buck a square foot. Spinnaker cloth is even less. So what do you save? 50 bucks? If I'm going to sit at the sewing machine for a few hours, plus put in a mess of grommets, I'd rather spend the $50 and have something I'm proud of. Actually I dont think many of the polys are sewn,,,,and your going to like the fact that some use carpet tape. A real class act. But I understand. I've owned an old VW bug that was built out of parts salvaged from several bugs, a Karmann Ghia and an old Porsche. I've also owned a new Mercedes. Both had their charm, but believe me, the Mercedes was a lot more enjoyable to drive, especially if I had to drive more than walking distance from my apartment. Actually, I'd say that most of Pascoe's horrible examples are a big step up from poly dodgers. I would not use poly on a dodger...never said I would. The point I was making was regarding you statement "Why would anyone use third rate materials for something that takes a lot of manual labor?" Was the fact of the state of build of many production boats apply to your comment and can not just be directed at homebrew projects. OK. Are you claiming to because some builders use crap you're entitled to do the same? As you wish. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:12 -0400, Jeff wrote:
Mic wrote: In many locations, the average summer wind could be offered as proof that sailing is physically impossible! I really cant think of any, where would you suggest? The average wind in Myrtle Beach in August is 4 knots. Yep. The reputation of the tasman sea is an example or the north atlantic. But the trade winds are different and the pacific "milk run"... In all of those cases you'll encounter winds stronger than your implied average. Yep thats why I mentioned them, and other than the "horn" and the tip of south africa, well the artics too...relative to the vastness of the ocean, I dont consider that alot. But do you actually have a point to this? yes the generalization of average winds as noted would not necessary apply to these regions. How many people do you see go out when it is 30 knots sustained. Near zero. This is total nonsense. While I don't often leave the dock in high winds, at least once a year I find myself out in strong winds. Last year's episode had lighter wind than our normal max - it was about 30 but on the stern - it was the 10+ foot confused sea that annoyed my wife. There is a big difference in being out when 30 knots of wind occur and going out when there is that much wind, it not nonsense...it is fact. As you said yourself you dont often go out in such conditions. And many in pleasure boating and even passage making dont either. And for a dodger, it isn't the wind while sailing that counts, the wind at the dock can be just as bad. yep A few days after I launched this year we had gusts to about 50. ... No, obviously at some point it is prudent to remove the canvas. However, you made comments that seemed to imply that wind over 21 knots is so uncommon as to be not worth considering. No actually that is what is the most worth considering, but am of the opinion that it is not a frequent stat., "sustained" winds over 21 knots, geographic exceptions noted. I have no idea what you're trying to say ... Simple I take the "statement" as reasonable fact based on experience and practically every cruiser log published on the net. That the average sustained winds are usually less than about 21 knots, certain geographically noted exceptions excluded. ... How many boats have the ready provision for emerg. steering? I only know of one production boat as such. Why dont they have that, is almost common sense, (common sense isnt so common:{} ) Most are of a homebrew design. either as foresights or as required. My boat has two (potentially) independent rudder systems, with provision for an emergency tiller on either. My previous boat, and many quality boats with wheel steering, has provision for an emergency tiller. Yes, but not rudder.... As I said, my current boat has two complete systems, including two rudders. How are they configured? Are they production original, is one a homebrew or off the shelf? I have seen a "homebrew" pindel and grudeon rudder that worked like a cassette. The cassette was inserted to the grudeons and then the rudder through the cassette - very cool.....so easy and cheap to make. By using this cassette method is ingenious,,,,as trying to install a rudder in full on rough conditions might be more of a challenge. Don't a number of dinghies use this arrangement? Maybe but not what I have seen? This arrangement was not on a dingy. Frankly, if I were building a boat specifically for long distance passages, I'd want to minimize the chance of damage, with a heavy duty rudder mounted on skeg. Would that be "balanced"? If so How? Nope, it wouldn't be balanced. That's a nice attribute, but not necessary. If you're considering scenarios where you need to replace the rudder underway, you probably need a protected rudder more than a balanced one. I really need to create another topic on the issue of rudder and keels. As I am looking at 2 significantly (keel and rudder) different boats. A grampian 26 and a bayfield 25 and will be looking for opinions from which to help make a decision. Well thats really another topic "rudders and keels". I see a lot of spade rudders out there....at least the boats I am noticing. But its leads you to worrying about emergency rudders. This is not the path of simplicity. Not necessarly. Alot of factors of necessary force on a tiller has to do with sail balance and rudder design, current,wind, etc/ No, that's right up there with poly sails and pvc davits. And don't forget pepper in bottom paint. Havent seen the pvc davits anywhere.....yet;}} Fortunately, they haven't caught on, but I've seen a few. ... However, sailcloth is about a buck a square foot. Spinnaker cloth is even less. So what do you save? 50 bucks? If I'm going to sit at the sewing machine for a few hours, plus put in a mess of grommets, I'd rather spend the $50 and have something I'm proud of. Actually I dont think many of the polys are sewn,,,,and your going to like the fact that some use carpet tape. A real class act. But I understand. I've owned an old VW bug that was built out of parts salvaged from several bugs, a Karmann Ghia and an old Porsche. I've also owned a new Mercedes. Both had their charm, but believe me, the Mercedes was a lot more enjoyable to drive, especially if I had to drive more than walking distance from my apartment. Actually, I'd say that most of Pascoe's horrible examples are a big step up from poly dodgers. I would not use poly on a dodger...never said I would. The point I was making was regarding you statement "Why would anyone use third rate materials for something that takes a lot of manual labor?" Was the fact of the state of build of many production boats apply to your comment and can not just be directed at homebrew projects. OK. Are you claiming to because some builders use crap you're entitled to do the same? As you wish. No. The thread was put out for opinions, a good thing. Come to think of it no one suggested any possible tests of methods or materials, I think should one proceed with such material, tests would be inorder. Design could be the determining factor in reasonable success or failure. As Glenn pointed out the strenght of a curve would be greater than a square....- not possible with abs. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mic wrote:
But do you actually have a point to this? yes the generalization of average winds as noted would not necessary apply to these regions. My point was the the generalization of average winds applies to very little when considering how strong something has to be. How many people do you see go out when it is 30 knots sustained. Near zero. This is total nonsense. While I don't often leave the dock in high winds, at least once a year I find myself out in strong winds. Last year's episode had lighter wind than our normal max - it was about 30 but on the stern - it was the 10+ foot confused sea that annoyed my wife. There is a big difference in being out when 30 knots of wind occur and going out when there is that much wind, it not nonsense...it is fact. As you said yourself you dont often go out in such conditions. And many in pleasure boating and even passage making dont either. There is a difference in the intent, but 30 knots is 30 knots regardless of the intent. This is a discussion about design, not intent. While daysailors have the option of never leaving the dock unless the short term forecast is perfect, passage makers have made an commitment to take whatever the sea offers. Boats must be designed to the most severe weather they might reasonably encounter. For this consideration, the "average wind" is meaningless. So what would you think is a reasonable design point? In all of the larger boats I've owned, I've been out in 40+ knots, anchored in 50+, and had 60+ at the dock. All of them have made Atlantic crossings (not by me!), including the 25 footer. There is, of course, a flip side to this. I have friends who bought heavy weather boats for the security they offer, then found its not worth raising sail until its blowing 20; others have light air boats that need to be reefed above 15. But this is a somewhat different design issue. .... Simple I take the "statement" as reasonable fact based on experience and practically every cruiser log published on the net. That the average sustained winds are usually less than about 21 knots, certain geographically noted exceptions excluded. Yes, this is true. Just not relevant to the discussion. As I said, my current boat has two complete systems, including two rudders. How are they configured? Are they production original, is one a homebrew or off the shelf? Off the shelf, standard configuration, 100 built, plus another 100 of related designs. On most boats of my design, the rudder is a balanced spade, and I've know of one case where one of the rudders got jammed and had to be disconnected. My boat, and about a third of the newer sisterships, has a skeg hung rudder. Handling under sail suffers a bit, though I'm not sure its really a downside, since I don't use it for "round the buoys" racing. BTW, many of the other boats I considered had similar setups. The sailboat next to me in the yard had twin rudders, and one of the other sailboats on my dock, of a completely different style, also has twin rudders. .... I see a lot of spade rudders out there....at least the boats I am noticing. But its leads you to worrying about emergency rudders. This is not the path of simplicity. Not necessarly. Alot of factors of necessary force on a tiller has to do with sail balance and rudder design, current,wind, etc/ Yes, you have to look at the whole package. My previous boat had a rig that was prone to being unbalanced and overpowering, so I was glad to have a balanced spade. Before that, I had a full keel that tracked "on rails" so the spade wasn't needed. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:45:32 -0400, Jeff wrote:
Mic wrote: But do you actually have a point to this? yes the generalization of average winds as noted would not necessary apply to these regions. My point was the the generalization of average winds applies to very little when considering how strong something has to be. Good point, but to then figure that it has to be bullit proof is it reasonable for it to be built to withstand what max force? Where do you draw the line? That is my point. How many people do you see go out when it is 30 knots sustained. Near zero. This is total nonsense. While I don't often leave the dock in high winds, at least once a year I find myself out in strong winds. Last year's episode had lighter wind than our normal max - it was about 30 but on the stern - it was the 10+ foot confused sea that annoyed my wife. There is a big difference in being out when 30 knots of wind occur and going out when there is that much wind, it not nonsense...it is fact. As you said yourself you dont often go out in such conditions. And many in pleasure boating and even passage making dont either. There is a difference in the intent, but 30 knots is 30 knots regardless of the intent. This is a discussion about design, not intent. While daysailors have the option of never leaving the dock unless the short term forecast is perfect, passage makers have made an commitment to take whatever the sea offers. Yes if they are already out in it, but in the logs of Bumfuzzle on there way from panama to galapagoes in about 30 knots they were beating to the weather and wave, they made the decision to turn and run with the waves for the nearest port in SA. http://www.bumfuzzle.com/LogsDates.htm Also if you read bill_dietrich logs at: http://www.geocities.com/bill_dietri...agnoliaLog.txt Currently in Bahamas, you will see how many boats leave an anchorage and them shortly return... Bill has an excellent site at http://www.geocities.com/bill_dietri...boat.html#plan It is mostly a collection of thought of a huge amount of sailors collected over years from various sources.... Boats must be designed to the most severe weather they might reasonably encounter. For this consideration, the "average wind" is meaningless. Right average wind is meaningless, its the forces of the sea, as was pointed out in Glenn post. If most of the time the weather is not greater than 21 knots what do you reasonable design for? Do you design for the 7% of the time at the winds are above 21 knots? To design anthing nautical for just 21 knots would be foolish, I never suggested that, but rather reiterated a stat. I believe to be reasonable true. So what would you think is a reasonable design point? In all of the larger boats I've owned, I've been out in 40+ knots, anchored in 50+, and had 60+ at the dock. All of them have made Atlantic crossings (not by me!), including the 25 footer. I dont think I could answer that question, although in many instances builder and designers have lowered that point, when compared with earlier GRP production boats, but a much debatable subject. Some boats are designed with specific usage. But some near coastal craft have been taken on circumnavigations -blue water. There is, of course, a flip side to this. I have friends who bought heavy weather boats for the security they offer, then found its not worth raising sail until its blowing 20; others have light air boats that need to be reefed above 15. But this is a somewhat different design issue. Yep, that is somewhat of the issue I have in deciding between 2 boats. ... Simple I take the "statement" as reasonable fact based on experience and practically every cruiser log published on the net. That the average sustained winds are usually less than about 21 knots, certain geographically noted exceptions excluded. Yes, this is true. Just not relevant to the discussion. ????But this discussion always seems to focus around this issue. As I said, my current boat has two complete systems, including two rudders. How are they configured? Are they production original, is one a homebrew or off the shelf? Off the shelf, standard configuration, 100 built, plus another 100 of related designs. On most boats of my design, the rudder is a balanced spade, and I've know of one case where one of the rudders got jammed and had to be disconnected. My boat, and about a third of the newer sisterships, has a skeg hung rudder. Handling under sail suffers a bit, though I'm not sure its really a downside, since I don't use it for "round the buoys" racing. Are you a boat designer? BTW, many of the other boats I considered had similar setups. The sailboat next to me in the yard had twin rudders, and one of the other sailboats on my dock, of a completely different style, also has twin rudders. How are the twin rudders configured? What make of boat? I have seen a mono with a spade rudder and a transom hung one as well but this was an after design and more based on a emerg. 2nd rudder. ... I see a lot of spade rudders out there....at least the boats I am noticing. But its leads you to worrying about emergency rudders. This is not the path of simplicity. Not necessarly. Alot of factors of necessary force on a tiller has to do with sail balance and rudder design, current,wind, etc/ Yes, you have to look at the whole package. My previous boat had a rig that was prone to being unbalanced and overpowering, so I was glad to have a balanced spade. Before that, I had a full keel that tracked "on rails" so the spade wasn't needed. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mic wrote:
Good point, but to then figure that it has to be bullit proof is it reasonable for it to be built to withstand what max force? Where do you draw the line? That is my point. Somewhere above the average wind and below a Force 5 hurricane. There is a difference in the intent, but 30 knots is 30 knots regardless of the intent. This is a discussion about design, not intent. While daysailors have the option of never leaving the dock unless the short term forecast is perfect, passage makers have made an commitment to take whatever the sea offers. Yes if they are already out in it, but in the logs of Bumfuzzle on there way from panama to galapagoes in about 30 knots they were beating to the weather and wave, they made the decision to turn and run with the waves for the nearest port in SA. http://www.bumfuzzle.com/LogsDates.htm True, but they were still out in it. It just happened that in this case, they had an alternative. If they didn't have the alternative, would they have abandoned ship? Also if you read bill_dietrich logs at: http://www.geocities.com/bill_dietri...agnoliaLog.txt Currently in Bahamas, you will see how many boats leave an anchorage and them shortly return... Seen it all the time, been there myself. It doesn't change a thing. You must assume that every now and them you'll be caught in stronger winds than you normally are comfortable in. Frankly, these people are lucky that the weak link is their own nerve (or their stomachs), rather than the boat. I've never been happy on a boat that I don't have a lot of faith in - I like to think that the boat and its gear can handle any situation I'm willing to get into. .... So what would you think is a reasonable design point? In all of the larger boats I've owned, I've been out in 40+ knots, anchored in 50+, and had 60+ at the dock. All of them have made Atlantic crossings (not by me!), including the 25 footer. I dont think I could answer that question, although in many instances builder and designers have lowered that point, when compared with earlier GRP production boats, but a much debatable subject. If you plan to go out there, you had better be able to answer it. Every choice you make for gear and planning will have this in the background. One of the biggest mistakes people make is not understanding how they will really use their boat, especially cruising sailboats. It seems that some buyers equate the number of berths with blue water capability, or stainless fittings with quality construction. Other buyers are obsessed with getting the strongest, heaviest boat possible when they never leave their protected bay. It seems like every few weeks someone here asks advice on the proper boat for ocean passages, because they plan to learn to sail next year and want the right boat. Some boats are designed with specific usage. But some near coastal craft have been taken on circumnavigations -blue water. Absolutely true. However, when you hear of a boat foundering in a 40 knot gale offshore, you usually find its a lightweight coastal cruiser, or a poorly maintained older boat. And remember - you've been "surprised" that more boats don't have provisions for emergency rudders. Most of these coastal boats don't, in fact relatively few passage makers nowadays have that. There is, of course, a flip side to this. I have friends who bought heavy weather boats for the security they offer, then found its not worth raising sail until its blowing 20; others have light air boats that need to be reefed above 15. But this is a somewhat different design issue. Yep, that is somewhat of the issue I have in deciding between 2 boats. The couple that used a Westsail for an ICW trip found that using a tiller on such a heavy boat was just too much of a pain. They gave it up soon after returning. ... Simple I take the "statement" as reasonable fact based on experience and practically every cruiser log published on the net. That the average sustained winds are usually less than about 21 knots, certain geographically noted exceptions excluded. Yes, this is true. Just not relevant to the discussion. ????But this discussion always seems to focus around this issue. I can say no more. How are they configured? Are they production original, is one a homebrew or off the shelf? Off the shelf, standard configuration, 100 built, plus another 100 of related designs. On most boats of my design, the rudder is a balanced spade, and I've know of one case where one of the rudders got jammed and had to be disconnected. My boat, and about a third of the newer sisterships, has a skeg hung rudder. Handling under sail suffers a bit, though I'm not sure its really a downside, since I don't use it for "round the buoys" racing. Are you a boat designer? Nope, although that was my first major in school. I found my talents lie elsewhe I spent the last 25 years as a computer programmer. BTW, many of the other boats I considered had similar setups. The sailboat next to me in the yard had twin rudders, and one of the other sailboats on my dock, of a completely different style, also has twin rudders. How are the twin rudders configured? What make of boat? I have seen a mono with a spade rudder and a transom hung one as well but this was an after design and more based on a emerg. 2nd rudder. I suppose I have to tell eventually ... I have a catamaran, a PDQ 36. One rudder on each hull, off course, tied together with a crosslink attached to each quadrant. One is driven by a cable from the wheel; each can accept a tiller from above. Although space, speed, and stability were the primary factors in going with a cat, the safety of twin rudders, twin engines, and the flotation of twin hulls were a significant part of the decision. Jeff www.sv-loki.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Opaque fresh water tubing | Cruising | |||
Roger Dodger!!! | ASA | |||
The Dodger Defense | ASA | |||
Dodger...Over and out.... | ASA | |||
Ageing Dodger | Cruising |