Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance
On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. .. Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. .. Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 .. Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. .. Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. .. Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: .. National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. .. Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who wants to be cruising somewhere you're not wanted?
Stay somewhere else. All hundred thousand cruisers don't make a molehill compared to the taxes paid by Miami Beach residents, it's their city, leave them alone! Jack "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stick to spreading misinformation on radio issues Jack. Leave cruising
issues to cruisers. Doug "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:1JTbe.39$qV3.13@lakeread04... Who wants to be cruising somewhere you're not wanted? Stay somewhere else. All hundred thousand cruisers don't make a molehill compared to the taxes paid by Miami Beach residents, it's their city, leave them alone! Jack "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Dotson" wrote Stick to spreading misinformation on radio issues Jack. Leave cruising issues to cruisers. Doug It's true that your claimed expertise with amateur radio left you nonetheless very confused on a few marine radio issues. I have also cruised Florida, by sail and power. Exactly what form of "cruiser" are you taking a position for this time Doug? When was the last time you wanted to anchor inside the city limits of any (U.S.) city you visited for more than 72 hours? That describes the kind of boat-bums that the legislation was designed to prevent, and whatever else you may be, I'll bet you stayed overnight at nice marinas when transiting areas like Miami Beach, if you stopped there at all. But then maybe that's not the issue at all. Maybe you just can't resist another dig at me, like the last one you took which I never responded to. Jack "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:1JTbe.39$qV3.13@lakeread04... Who wants to be cruising somewhere you're not wanted? Stay somewhere else. All hundred thousand cruisers don't make a molehill compared to the taxes paid by Miami Beach residents, it's their city, leave them alone! Jack "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:OdVbe.47$qV3.34@lakeread04... "Doug Dotson" wrote Stick to spreading misinformation on radio issues Jack. Leave cruising issues to cruisers. Doug It's true that your claimed expertise with amateur radio left you nonetheless very confused on a few marine radio issues. I have also cruised Florida, by sail and power. Exactly what form of "cruiser" are you taking a position for this time Doug? What are the choices? When was the last time you wanted to anchor inside the city limits of any (U.S.) city you visited for more than 72 hours? Last weekend. That describes the kind of boat-bums that the legislation was designed to prevent, and whatever else you may be, I'll bet you stayed overnight at nice marinas when transiting areas like Miami Beach, if you stopped there at all. Rarely stay at marinas. Miami Beach isn;t high on my list of places to visit anyway. But then maybe that's not the issue at all. Maybe you just can't resist another dig at me, like the last one you took which I never responded to. Didn;t take much this time did it? Jack "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:1JTbe.39$qV3.13@lakeread04... Who wants to be cruising somewhere you're not wanted? Stay somewhere else. All hundred thousand cruisers don't make a molehill compared to the taxes paid by Miami Beach residents, it's their city, leave them alone! Jack "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you stop for a minute to think about it, this is not a very bad thing for
cruisers since a "72 hour" ordinance covering all of Miami Beach waters is practically unenforceable. The law will give local law enforcement a way to roust boaters who are trying to squat permanently in one spot. But how are they going to keep track of a cruiser waiting to cross the Gulf Stream who can move from spot to spot every couple of days while waiting for a weather window? I am against this kind of anti cruiser legislation, but I don't see this particular ordinance as much of a threat. If it were 24 hour limit, then it would be more of a problem. "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tkranz wrote:
If you stop for a minute to think about it, this is not a very bad thing for cruisers since a "72 hour" ordinance covering all of Miami Beach waters is practically unenforceable. The law will give local law enforcement a way to roust boaters who are trying to squat permanently in one spot. But how are they going to keep track of a cruiser waiting to cross the Gulf Stream who can move from spot to spot every couple of days while waiting for a weather window? I am against this kind of anti cruiser legislation, but I don't see this particular ordinance as much of a threat. If it were 24 hour limit, then it would be more of a problem. "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors It will be enforceable because the marine patrol will keep a list of the boat names and they patrol all the available anchoring areas. Boat name shows up on the list on the fourth day, citation. Quite often in the fall and winter you have to wait for a week or more for a good weather window. While waiting, a lot of cruisers avail themselves of the local restaurants, re-provisioning, nightlife, etc. The local merchants had no input to this ordinance. Just another case of big money buying favors again. krj |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The same thing was tried at North Lake Worth a few years
back. Turns out that enforcing such a law is generally in violation of maritime law. Boat US and a bunch of boater/lawyers pitched in a got it shot down. I suspect that this situation will be resolved in much the same manner. "tkranz" wrote in message ... If you stop for a minute to think about it, this is not a very bad thing for cruisers since a "72 hour" ordinance covering all of Miami Beach waters is practically unenforceable. The law will give local law enforcement a way to roust boaters who are trying to squat permanently in one spot. But how are they going to keep track of a cruiser waiting to cross the Gulf Stream who can move from spot to spot every couple of days while waiting for a weather window? I am against this kind of anti cruiser legislation, but I don't see this particular ordinance as much of a threat. If it were 24 hour limit, then it would be more of a problem. "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote in message ... The same thing was tried at North Lake Worth a few years back. Turns out that enforcing such a law is generally in violation of maritime law. Boat US and a bunch of boater/lawyers pitched in a got it shot down. I suspect that this situation will be resolved in much the same manner. You are correct. In order for a violation to be valid there has to be proof that a vessel was there *continuously* for 72 or more hours. All one needs do is claim to have gone sailing and moved (even it if is only a boatlength or two) and re-anchored and have a couple witnesses testify to it. Unless the authorities can prove that a vessel did not move (running a video tape 24/3) then you're not guilty. Remember, one is innocent until proven guilty and the proving of guilt is very difficult, if not impossible. That's what shot down the anchoring ordinances in West Palm. CN |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... "Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote in message ... The same thing was tried at North Lake Worth a few years back. Turns out that enforcing such a law is generally in violation of maritime law. Boat US and a bunch of boater/lawyers pitched in a got it shot down. I suspect that this situation will be resolved in much the same manner. You are correct. In order for a violation to be valid there has to be proof that a vessel was there *continuously* for 72 or more hours. All one needs do is claim to have gone sailing and moved (even it if is only a boatlength or two) and re-anchored and have a couple witnesses testify to it. Unless the authorities can prove that a vessel did not move (running a video tape 24/3) then you're not guilty. Remember, one is innocent until proven guilty and the proving of guilt is very difficult, if not impossible. That's what shot down the anchoring ordinances in West Palm. That's not how it was explained to me. The deal in West Palm was that the community did not own the water and had no jurisdiction on its use, period. Nothing to do with being not able to reliable enforce any 72 hour limit. CN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Update on Marina Damage -- FL Coasts | Cruising | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | General | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | Boat Building | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | Cruising | |||
Anyone familiar with maritime law? | General |