Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote in message ... The same thing was tried at North Lake Worth a few years back. Turns out that enforcing such a law is generally in violation of maritime law. Boat US and a bunch of boater/lawyers pitched in a got it shot down. I suspect that this situation will be resolved in much the same manner. You are correct. In order for a violation to be valid there has to be proof that a vessel was there *continuously* for 72 or more hours. All one needs do is claim to have gone sailing and moved (even it if is only a boatlength or two) and re-anchored and have a couple witnesses testify to it. Unless the authorities can prove that a vessel did not move (running a video tape 24/3) then you're not guilty. Remember, one is innocent until proven guilty and the proving of guilt is very difficult, if not impossible. That's what shot down the anchoring ordinances in West Palm. CN |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... "Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote in message ... The same thing was tried at North Lake Worth a few years back. Turns out that enforcing such a law is generally in violation of maritime law. Boat US and a bunch of boater/lawyers pitched in a got it shot down. I suspect that this situation will be resolved in much the same manner. You are correct. In order for a violation to be valid there has to be proof that a vessel was there *continuously* for 72 or more hours. All one needs do is claim to have gone sailing and moved (even it if is only a boatlength or two) and re-anchored and have a couple witnesses testify to it. Unless the authorities can prove that a vessel did not move (running a video tape 24/3) then you're not guilty. Remember, one is innocent until proven guilty and the proving of guilt is very difficult, if not impossible. That's what shot down the anchoring ordinances in West Palm. That's not how it was explained to me. The deal in West Palm was that the community did not own the water and had no jurisdiction on its use, period. Nothing to do with being not able to reliable enforce any 72 hour limit. CN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Update on Marina Damage -- FL Coasts | Cruising | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | General | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | Boat Building | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | Cruising | |||
Anyone familiar with maritime law? | General |