Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stick to spreading misinformation on radio issues Jack. Leave cruising
issues to cruisers. Doug "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:1JTbe.39$qV3.13@lakeread04... Who wants to be cruising somewhere you're not wanted? Stay somewhere else. All hundred thousand cruisers don't make a molehill compared to the taxes paid by Miami Beach residents, it's their city, leave them alone! Jack "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Dotson" wrote Stick to spreading misinformation on radio issues Jack. Leave cruising issues to cruisers. Doug It's true that your claimed expertise with amateur radio left you nonetheless very confused on a few marine radio issues. I have also cruised Florida, by sail and power. Exactly what form of "cruiser" are you taking a position for this time Doug? When was the last time you wanted to anchor inside the city limits of any (U.S.) city you visited for more than 72 hours? That describes the kind of boat-bums that the legislation was designed to prevent, and whatever else you may be, I'll bet you stayed overnight at nice marinas when transiting areas like Miami Beach, if you stopped there at all. But then maybe that's not the issue at all. Maybe you just can't resist another dig at me, like the last one you took which I never responded to. Jack "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:1JTbe.39$qV3.13@lakeread04... Who wants to be cruising somewhere you're not wanted? Stay somewhere else. All hundred thousand cruisers don't make a molehill compared to the taxes paid by Miami Beach residents, it's their city, leave them alone! Jack "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:OdVbe.47$qV3.34@lakeread04... "Doug Dotson" wrote Stick to spreading misinformation on radio issues Jack. Leave cruising issues to cruisers. Doug It's true that your claimed expertise with amateur radio left you nonetheless very confused on a few marine radio issues. I have also cruised Florida, by sail and power. Exactly what form of "cruiser" are you taking a position for this time Doug? What are the choices? When was the last time you wanted to anchor inside the city limits of any (U.S.) city you visited for more than 72 hours? Last weekend. That describes the kind of boat-bums that the legislation was designed to prevent, and whatever else you may be, I'll bet you stayed overnight at nice marinas when transiting areas like Miami Beach, if you stopped there at all. Rarely stay at marinas. Miami Beach isn;t high on my list of places to visit anyway. But then maybe that's not the issue at all. Maybe you just can't resist another dig at me, like the last one you took which I never responded to. Didn;t take much this time did it? Jack "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:1JTbe.39$qV3.13@lakeread04... Who wants to be cruising somewhere you're not wanted? Stay somewhere else. All hundred thousand cruisers don't make a molehill compared to the taxes paid by Miami Beach residents, it's their city, leave them alone! Jack "krj" wrote in message . .. Miami Beach 72-hour Anchoring Ordinance On April 20, 2005 cruising sailors suffered another blow to their anchoring rights when the Mayor and City Commissioners of Miami Beach, Florida unanimously passed a bill prohibiting anchoring within city limits for periods longer than 72 hours. The last hurdle before the bill becomes law is a second public reading that will take place on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at a public hearing in Commission Chambers at Miami Beach City Hall. Miami Beach has become a favorite staging and provisioning location for a large percentage of the estimated 100,000 boaters bound for the Bahamas, in addition to boats headed for the Caribbean and Florida Keys each year. Businesses in Miami Beach that serve the cruising community were not consulted regarding the economic impact of the action. However, one commissioner was somehow able to determine that "the amount of money spent [by these boaters] was miniscule." For cruising boats crossing the often turbulent Gulf Stream, concerns are larger than where to provision. While another commissioner claimed with authority that "72 hours was sufficient" time to wait for weather, those of us who have made the crossing know that small craft warnings are often posted for weeks at a time during the winter months, making the passage dangerous for many. This extremely brief window will undoubtedly create a situation that will force captains to decide between harassment and fines or subjecting their boats and crews to seas neither were meant to handle. Fortunately, there is an exception to the 72-hour limit during periods when hurricane warnings are in effect or when members of the crew are sick. The reason most often cited by the eight or so residents who spoke in favor of the restriction was the visual intrusion associated with vessels anchored near their expensive waterfront homes. Also cited were theft, trespass, and pollution. Dr. Morris Sunshine, Chairman of the Miami Beach Marine Authority, an advisory group on marine matters, testified before Commissioners that the Commander of the Miami Beach Marine Patrol was questioned by the Authority and could not cite a single case of theft attributable to the cruising community. The Commissioners ignored Dr. Sunshine's request to firmly instruct the City Manager to start planning to install a mooring field and to designate a legal anchoring area. In contrast to cities like Vero Beach, Florida where forward-looking leaders implemented well-thought-out plans that cleaned up derelict boats from the harbor, accommodated seasonal boaters, and brought revenue to the city and local businesses, the Miami Beach leadership's plan is to spend $1.75 million over the next two years to enforce a legally questionable ordinance that chases legitimate boaters and their business away while leaving the real problems behind. After last year's hurricane season, the Florida Legislature is being pressured to allow marina operators to force boat owners out of the marinas during major storms. Therefore, it makes far more sense to spend money to provide a harbor with safe, heavy-duty moorings that will protect residents' boats during hurricanes in the summer, and accommodate transient boats year round. The City can then prohibit anchoring elsewhere, protecting the seabed and eliminating derelict boats, if it so chooses. It's ironic that a city that spends millions each year to attract tourists, and hosts the largest boat show in the U.S., is trying to pass a law that will chase a large and responsible group of boaters out of local waters. This ordinance is full of holes and could be defeated by a coalition of boaters who are losing their rights, local businesses whose profits will suffer, and residents who will bear the $1.75 million enforcement price tag that benefits a handful of Miami Beach's wealthiest residents. Local regulators rely on the assumption that sailors have little interest in waging political/legal battles; so in addition to local action, we must also address this issue through the state legislature and courts. The marine industry is one of Florida's largest - it's time for businesses to realize that they must persuade lawmakers in Tallahassee to protect boaters' right of access to safe haven before there are no boaters left to buy their products. The two primary marine trade associations that may be able to achieve a workable solution to this situation are listed below. WHAT YOU CAN DO Write or e-mail the people or associations below. Tell them about your boating habits - where you cruise, how much you spend, what your safety issues are, that you're a member of SSCA and what clean wake cruising means. You will also find links to other representatives of the marine industry and to your Florida legislators on the Seven Seas Cruising Association website, www.SSCA.org. Tell anybody you think might be affected - other boaters, merchants, local law enforcement agencies, community leaders - and direct them to the same resources. . Visit www.SSCA.org for links to representatives of the marine industry as well as information about the organization itself. . Attend the May 18 meeting at Miami Beach City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach FL, 33139 . Follow movement of the bill at www.miamibeachfl.gov. . Find your legislators at www.myFlorida.com. . Email or write to: Mayor David Dermer: City Staff Attorney Gary Held: City Manager Jorge Gonzalez: Commissioners: Matti Bower: Jose Smith: Saul Gross: Richard Steinberg: Simon Cruz: Luis Garcia: . National Marine Manufactures Association (NMMA), Thom Dammrich, President 200 Randolph Drive, Suite 5100, Chicago, IL 60601-6528 (312) 946-6200, (312) 946-0401-fax; www.nmma.org and www.discoverboating.com The NMMA sponsors the annual Miami Boat Show, held simultaneously in three venues in Miami Beach and two venues in Miami. Relocating even one of the sites out of Miami Beach and into Miami would send a significant economic message. . Marine Industries Association of South Florida, 2312 S Andrews Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954) 524-2733, www.miasf.org MIASF is a marine trade association lobby group. Richard Blackford Vice President, at the direction of the SSCA Board of Directors |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Update on Marina Damage -- FL Coasts | Cruising | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | General | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | Boat Building | |||
??? about anchoring to a sand beach | Cruising | |||
Anyone familiar with maritime law? | General |