LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19   Report Post  
Albert P. Belle Isle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:16:09 GMT, Albert P. Belle Isle
wrote:


Our resting WL is 24'. To maintain a 1.34 constant and get the speeds
we've verified while definitely not surfing, our effective waterline
would have to be greater than 35'. That's a LONG way behind our transom!


Jere -

As a quick calculation, 24ft DWL would yield a hull speed of about
6.6kt with a speed-length coefficient of 1.34. To get to 7kt, the
effective DWL at 1.34 would be a little over 27ft - not 35ft.

My previous boat had a DWL of 28ft, for which a speed-length
coefficient of 1.34 would predict 7.1kt.

I easily got 7.4kt on beam reaches, which would say my real
coefficient was almost 1.4 (or that my effective DWL at 1.34 was a
little over 30ft - a two foot "push-back" of the sten wave, which was
roughly how the peak of the stern wave looked from my cockpit.

Regards,
Al

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hull Design & Displacement Hulls winder General 0 December 28th 04 11:00 AM
The future of yacht design - 10 myths scotched Frank ASA 0 June 28th 04 02:42 PM
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34 Jim Cate ASA 48 March 14th 04 10:42 PM
Crusing, hull speed, Cal 34 ft vs O'Day 34 Jim Cate Cruising 14 March 8th 04 09:06 PM
allied seawind 2 hull speed Jeff Morris General 0 August 31st 03 09:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017