Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A little (or perhaps too much) background. I am relatively new to
sailing. I have completed ASA 101-104, I have been sailing on a rented 22' sailboat, and I have read everything available sailboats and sailing (though not all is assimulated). I know this: -most of my sailing will be solo, though occasionally I will sail with my wife and two large teenagers. Nevertheless, most of the time I will be single-handling (I have many books on the subject and am aware of the options I should explore rigging, etc.). I am not sailing to meet or mingle. My definition of 'hell' is sitting on a sailboat with a bunch of drunk people listening to Jimmy Buffet music; no offense, but I'm sort of the ex-hippie type. - second, most of my sailing will be daysailing and 1-2 night cruises on the northern to central Chesapeake. HOWEVER, I want the capacity to go coastal, and when I go coastal I am more likely to head towards Maine and Canada than the Carribean.I essentially do not work between May-Sep., so I plan some longer excursions, but I do have a wife and kid, so for now I would never go out for more than a couple of weeks. -third, there is a remote chance that I may someday try an Atlantic crossing, as I am an extreme athlete (ironmans, eco-challenge, mountain climbing), and am subsequently motivated by the 'because it's there philosophy'. I am getting too old for these other sports (50-something) and sailing is my new lifestyle adventure.I suspect that I will want to do something a bit more risky. I, however, do not want to weight 'bluewater capable' too heavily in my selection, as this is more phantasy than reality for me at this point. And this topic has been adressed many times in this forum. I am limited to about 70k. I am looking at older boats. Aesthetically, I like the traditional look.That is, the boats that appeal to my eye are heavy and, with exceptions, slower, and, I suspect, particularly slow on the Chesapeake.I confess that speed is an issue for me, not absolute speed, but speed relative to other sailboats, because I am by nature a Type A competitor and resent being passed. Alternatively stated, I suspect that if I bought a Westsail or Perry 36, I would regret it. The BCC, on the other hand, seems to be faster. So, I am looking for a boat that is relatively fast, but also steady and sturdy in moderately rough weather, and points well when single-handling. I, of course, need a keel/rudder/displacement configuration that will allow me to moor or dock the boat without scaring you as to whether I am going to hit you (again, my understanding is that the Westsail would not be good for single-handed daysailing 2-3 times per week). I am also looking for a boat that will hold some of its value if I put sweat equity into it. Most of my serious contenders fall between 30-38'. I am looking at: -Bristol 31.1 and 35.5 (very few available) -1980 Tarton 37 (love their interiors and exteriors, though nervous about cored hull) -I love the Bristol Channel Cutter (it's so cute it says 'up yours')($$$) - early 80's Pacific Seacraft 31 (but too expensive) - early 80's pearson 365 -1983 Ericson 38 -1978 Shannon 38 -1985 Wausquiez 33 - 32-34' Sabre from mid-80's -I am also looking at C&C 38 Landfall (nervous about older hull and deck) and Freedoms in the 36' range (nervous about hull) -And yes,economics may determine that I end up with something like a Catalina 34 (I like the looks and differ with those who call it 'plain vanilla) or Beneteau First 345-375 - not crazy about exterior, but there is another side of me (the hippie turned yuppie) that likes the 'euro'interior look.It certainly looks like a buyer's market for Beneteaus I am not asking for feedback on each one of these boats (have various reviews from practical sailer, Horner, boatus,this site and others, etc.), but want to know if any of these may be particularly weak or strong in meeting my criteria: not slow, can dock single-handed without great risk (I have read quite a bit about this issue and plan to get private instruction), is likely to have a reliable hull/deck,and would be able to handle moderately rough weather on an extended coastal cruise. If, like the BCC, it can cross the Atlantic, hey, that's great.Thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Wow wee...... good thing you're starting small! Just kiddin'.......I'll be keeping an eye on this thread. I had some of the same requirements and goals on a fraction of your ambitions and resources. I went with a trailerable sailboat. good luck! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject
I single handed a 30 ft boat all over the lower Great lakes for several years including a couple of 1 month cruises. 30 ft is about optimum when it comes to a lot of things like handling, over night dockage, etc. Find a 30 ft Catalina. There are lots of them out there. After the round of depreciation, they tend to hold their value, so when it comes time to sell, your sailing will not have cost you a lot of money thru further depreciation. SFWIW, I'm about as type "A" as they get until I step aboard a boat, then a transformation takes place. Sailing and cruising are done in a 5 MPH world, relax and enjoy it. You want to race, get a horse IMHO.G Lew |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lew Hodgett wrote:
Subject I single handed a 30 ft boat all over the lower Great lakes for several years including a couple of 1 month cruises. 30 ft is about optimum when it comes to a lot of things like handling, over night dockage, etc. Find a 30 ft Catalina. I'm no sailboat expert but if you're going to recommend a Catalina, why not a 34'? He's got the budget for it. There are lots of them out there. After the round of depreciation, they tend to hold their value, so when it comes time to sell, your sailing will not have cost you a lot of money thru further depreciation. SFWIW, I'm about as type "A" as they get until I step aboard a boat, then a transformation takes place. Sailing and cruising are done in a 5 MPH world, relax and enjoy it. You want to race, get a horse IMHO.G Again, I disagree. Try: http://www.phrfne.org/page/567 The lower the number, the faster the boat, but don't go crazy with it. The fastest ones are poor designs for cruising comfort. Stephen |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Consider Alberg 30, Alberg37?
wrote in message oups.com... A little (or perhaps too much) background. I am relatively new to sailing. I have completed ASA 101-104, I have been sailing on a rented 22' sailboat, and I have read everything available sailboats and sailing (though not all is assimulated). I know this: -most of my sailing will be solo, though occasionally I will sail with my wife and two large teenagers. Nevertheless, most of the time I will be single-handling (I have many books on the subject and am aware of the options I should explore rigging, etc.). I am not sailing to meet or mingle. My definition of 'hell' is sitting on a sailboat with a bunch of drunk people listening to Jimmy Buffet music; no offense, but I'm sort of the ex-hippie type. - second, most of my sailing will be daysailing and 1-2 night cruises on the northern to central Chesapeake. HOWEVER, I want the capacity to go coastal, and when I go coastal I am more likely to head towards Maine and Canada than the Carribean.I essentially do not work between May-Sep., so I plan some longer excursions, but I do have a wife and kid, so for now I would never go out for more than a couple of weeks. -third, there is a remote chance that I may someday try an Atlantic crossing, as I am an extreme athlete (ironmans, eco-challenge, mountain climbing), and am subsequently motivated by the 'because it's there philosophy'. I am getting too old for these other sports (50-something) and sailing is my new lifestyle adventure.I suspect that I will want to do something a bit more risky. I, however, do not want to weight 'bluewater capable' too heavily in my selection, as this is more phantasy than reality for me at this point. And this topic has been adressed many times in this forum. I am limited to about 70k. I am looking at older boats. Aesthetically, I like the traditional look.That is, the boats that appeal to my eye are heavy and, with exceptions, slower, and, I suspect, particularly slow on the Chesapeake.I confess that speed is an issue for me, not absolute speed, but speed relative to other sailboats, because I am by nature a Type A competitor and resent being passed. Alternatively stated, I suspect that if I bought a Westsail or Perry 36, I would regret it. The BCC, on the other hand, seems to be faster. So, I am looking for a boat that is relatively fast, but also steady and sturdy in moderately rough weather, and points well when single-handling. I, of course, need a keel/rudder/displacement configuration that will allow me to moor or dock the boat without scaring you as to whether I am going to hit you (again, my understanding is that the Westsail would not be good for single-handed daysailing 2-3 times per week). I am also looking for a boat that will hold some of its value if I put sweat equity into it. Most of my serious contenders fall between 30-38'. I am looking at: -Bristol 31.1 and 35.5 (very few available) -1980 Tarton 37 (love their interiors and exteriors, though nervous about cored hull) -I love the Bristol Channel Cutter (it's so cute it says 'up yours')($$$) - early 80's Pacific Seacraft 31 (but too expensive) - early 80's pearson 365 -1983 Ericson 38 -1978 Shannon 38 -1985 Wausquiez 33 - 32-34' Sabre from mid-80's -I am also looking at C&C 38 Landfall (nervous about older hull and deck) and Freedoms in the 36' range (nervous about hull) -And yes,economics may determine that I end up with something like a Catalina 34 (I like the looks and differ with those who call it 'plain vanilla) or Beneteau First 345-375 - not crazy about exterior, but there is another side of me (the hippie turned yuppie) that likes the 'euro'interior look.It certainly looks like a buyer's market for Beneteaus I am not asking for feedback on each one of these boats (have various reviews from practical sailer, Horner, boatus,this site and others, etc.), but want to know if any of these may be particularly weak or strong in meeting my criteria: not slow, can dock single-handed without great risk (I have read quite a bit about this issue and plan to get private instruction), is likely to have a reliable hull/deck,and would be able to handle moderately rough weather on an extended coastal cruise. If, like the BCC, it can cross the Atlantic, hey, that's great.Thanks |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:22:30 -0500, "Gabriel Latrémouille"
wrote: Consider Alberg 30, Alberg37? =========================== Solid boats but really sloooow by modern standards. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to thank those who replied to my question. I have looked at some
of the boats mentioned above; the Nonsuch(seems to me to be a good, more affordable option to the Bristol Channel Cutter and, since it has a Freedom-like set-up, is easier to single-hand). I have also been keeping track of the CS36 (I consider Canada my second home - one for sale in Annapolis), the Catalina 30 (tons of these on the market below 35k), the old Cherubini Hunter Cutter ( a diamond in the rough), and the older C&C35. I have also read about the Dickerson (Ferenc Mate). I have read, perhaps on this forum, that the Camper & Nicholsons had serious blistering problems (any confirmation?).Note that my familiarity with most of these boats is via the internet. I may go to Annapolis this weekend to meet them.I am just trying to narrow my options down. I will probably go with the boat that I ( after confirmed by a surveyor) think is a good deal, given the criteria I outlined in a previous post: can single-hand, but not too small of a boat; I do not have to run for cover when the weather turns moderately nasty; has a solid hull, but is not slow; has traditional looks inside - I confess to liking mohogany or 'teak caves'- and out (love the BCC) Let me ask a more specific question(s).What displacement, keel, rudder parameters make it very difficult to dock single-handed, even in the relatively calm airs of the northern Chesapeake? I am assuming that a real heavy (given LWL plus or minus 26-28') boat with a full-length keel like the Westsail has would be very hard to dock by myself, or at least be a pain in the butt if I daysail frequently - assume that I will be docking under engine power.I am leaning toward a traditional more heavily displacing boat whose LWL is greater than 26' so as to give me decent internal room when I am in the company of three other adults, but I do not want a boat with so heavy an initial stability that I could out-swim it in lighter airs. Thanks, Brian, sail out of Havre de Grace, MD - home, Lititz, PA PS: anybody know of a broker in the Annapolis area who may be my 'cup of tea'. The website of 'rouguewaves' out of Annapolis intrigues me. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sailboat as powered cruiser? | General | |||
??? | General | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | ASA | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | General | |||
Repost - this is so good it deserves to be read more than once | ASA |