Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Read Dave Geer(?)'s the Nature of Boats it will help you choose the size you
really need and discusses the variables that may make you more satisfied. Scott wrote in message oups.com... I want to thank those who replied to my question. I have looked at some of the boats mentioned above; the Nonsuch(seems to me to be a good, more affordable option to the Bristol Channel Cutter and, since it has a Freedom-like set-up, is easier to single-hand). I have also been keeping track of the CS36 (I consider Canada my second home - one for sale in Annapolis), the Catalina 30 (tons of these on the market below 35k), the old Cherubini Hunter Cutter ( a diamond in the rough), and the older C&C35. I have also read about the Dickerson (Ferenc Mate). I have read, perhaps on this forum, that the Camper & Nicholsons had serious blistering problems (any confirmation?).Note that my familiarity with most of these boats is via the internet. I may go to Annapolis this weekend to meet them.I am just trying to narrow my options down. I will probably go with the boat that I ( after confirmed by a surveyor) think is a good deal, given the criteria I outlined in a previous post: can single-hand, but not too small of a boat; I do not have to run for cover when the weather turns moderately nasty; has a solid hull, but is not slow; has traditional looks inside - I confess to liking mohogany or 'teak caves'- and out (love the BCC) Let me ask a more specific question(s).What displacement, keel, rudder parameters make it very difficult to dock single-handed, even in the relatively calm airs of the northern Chesapeake? I am assuming that a real heavy (given LWL plus or minus 26-28') boat with a full-length keel like the Westsail has would be very hard to dock by myself, or at least be a pain in the butt if I daysail frequently - assume that I will be docking under engine power.I am leaning toward a traditional more heavily displacing boat whose LWL is greater than 26' so as to give me decent internal room when I am in the company of three other adults, but I do not want a boat with so heavy an initial stability that I could out-swim it in lighter airs. Thanks, Brian, sail out of Havre de Grace, MD - home, Lititz, PA PS: anybody know of a broker in the Annapolis area who may be my 'cup of tea'. The website of 'rouguewaves' out of Annapolis intrigues me. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
wrote: A little (or perhaps too much) background. I am relatively new to sailing. I have completed ASA 101-104, I have been sailing on a rented 22' sailboat, and I have read everything available sailboats and sailing (though not all is assimulated). I know this: Having read the rest of the thread first, I suggest you honestly assess what your probable sailing will be for the next few years (say 5-7 years) and get a boat that will do that well. Too many people get the "ultimate" boat that's too big or clumsy -- for their purposes -- because they think they might someday do long distance cruising. Those boats largely sit unused at the dock, often because they have to work extra time to pay off the debt. We chose Xan (below) for the "next" 5 years, intending to do mostly day trips and weekends, maybe doing a few weeks. A dozen years later, she still suits our needs for the next 5 or so years: up to 3-6 months doing the ICW and into the Bahamas, possibly the Virgins if we have time and inclination, as we know she'll love them. 3-week trips are a piece of cake, and we've gone halfway to Daytona (and reluctantly, back) without difficulty. Since she's so simple and responsive, we sail when others are motoring and I can put her anywhere I want under all conditions. We also are on on the water between 60 and 80 days a season, since either one of us can single-hand her comfortably. She's old and tough enough that we gunkhole without fear. So far, we've found her to be an ideal boat for the Chesapeake for a couple who sometimes has overnite visitors. Of course we're always on the lookout for "the next boat", but that definition has changed several times and is likely to change several times again before we're ready. Meanwhile, our checklist starts with trying the berths on for size, since we like to sleep together and want a dedicated berth. That knocked many boats out of the running. Next is the head, galley and stowage, then the cockpit. Finally, we worry about undercarriage because the slow boats get into the anchorage about the time the fast boats get their anchors down --not all that much difference-- and a good set of sails can help enormously. We have a full set of sails, including chute for light air (which I also single-hand). Oh, and she was and is CHEAP! The money we could have spent on a bigger boat and keeping it up is appreciating nicely, even after the bubble burst. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sailboat as powered cruiser? | General | |||
??? | General | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | ASA | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | General | |||
Repost - this is so good it deserves to be read more than once | ASA |