Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John R. Campbell" wrote in
: If travelling in a group of boats, consider some FRS radios which don't have much reach but don't need much when travelling close enough together. Less interference on the marine channels and the like... but it'd be *real* nice if some of the bridges down here were monitoring something other than VHF ch9. (These FRS rigs are very handy at other times, too, like w/ multiple cars, visiting Home Depot or Lowes and the like.) The best feature of FRS radios is you can say whatever you like without some kilocycle cop/boater or CG guy bitching at you to get the hell off his channel....(c; |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Larry W4CSC wrote:
John R. Campbell wrote: If travelling in a group of boats, consider some FRS radios which don't have much reach but don't need much when travelling close enough together. Less interference on the marine channels and the like... but it'd be *real* nice if some of the bridges down here were monitoring something other than VHF ch9. (These FRS rigs are very handy at other times, too, like w/ multiple cars, visiting Home Depot or Lowes and the like.) The best feature of FRS radios is you can say whatever you like without some kilocycle cop/boater or CG guy bitching at you to get the hell off his channel....(c; Sorry, I was trying for an "almost British" level of understatement in my post... and you said, in plain language, what I was trying to say in a more obscure form. (shakes head) Granted, I try for laughs... The point, really, is that FRS radios have such a low wattage that there's not much of a likelihood of interfering with others. The low costs (take a look around a CostCo or Best Buy or some such) and you'll not that the prices are also pretty low as well-- so losing one over the side isn't the utter disaster that a VHF hand-held would be. Of course I don't personally know if FRS can even be *licensed* for use outside the USA much less, if usable, what the rules'd be. Granted, you have to remember to use a *real* VHF rig in order to hail others ... especially distress calls. Additionally, one suggestion: regular hand-held scanners are available for a lot less than a "real" VHF hand-held (especially if you only want to cover the marine bands) so one of *those* scanner would be handy for whoever is on communications watch. The real point being is that there is other tech out there that, while not tuned perfectly for the marine environment, is fairly usable... and cheap enough to more easily cope with replacements. While it makes sense to avoid "disposable tech", I think there are times when you want to use it to cut down on the "wear and tear" (of the PTT button?) of the far more critical marine-grade tech. Some tech obviously will not make the jump very well to marine conditions... but finding the more appropriate tech to carry over can be rather entertaining to discover. -- John R. Campbell Speaker to Machines soup at tampabay dot rr dot com "Grace is sufficient so Joy was let go." - Heather L. Campbell "Faith manages ... even though she didn't get promoted" - me Why OS X? Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 04:46:38 GMT, "John R. Campbell"
wrote: Of course I don't personally know if FRS can even be *licensed* for use outside the USA much less, if usable, what the rules'd be. The USA and Canada have the same FRS radio allocations, so US FRS radios can be used in Canada, and vice versa, without interfering with other services (whether it is strictly legal is another matter...) Other countries have similar services (and similar-appearing radios), but often on different frequencies - In North America, FRS is around 460 MHz, but the similar service in Europe is on 446 MHz - use of North American FRS radios in Europe, or vice versa, is likely to result in interference with licensed services on the other frequency, and is almost certainly illegal. -- Peter Bennett, VE7CEI peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca new newsgroup users info : http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"John R. Campbell" wrote: Of course I don't personally know if FRS can even be *licensed* for use outside the USA much less, if usable, what the rules'd be. Quite possibly they're covered by the old 100 mw rule: Less than a tenth of a watt was hardly considered a transmitter years ago, so you could do anything you wanted without regulation. 'Course, things probably have changed since. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Larry W4CSC wrote: The best feature of FRS radios is you can say whatever you like without some kilocycle cop/boater or CG guy bitching at you to get the hell off his channel....(c; God did Jackie Painter, bite your ass too..... He does get around... Me |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
VHF radio recommendation | General | |||
Modifying Icom IC-M800 | Electronics | |||
RDF for newbies and NN of KN | ASA | |||
VANISHED (stolen?)- a new (and unique) 57' Beneteau | Cruising |