Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It has been my experience, both in the air and on the water, that
errors in time and distance lead more often to getting lost than errors in direction. You know how time speeds up when you are busy and slows down when you are anxious? When equipment or work load forces you into navigating very simply, these perceptual shifts can quickly distort you situational awareness. When you are looking nervously for a landmark, the next similar thing you see is going to look a lot more like the one you need to find than it might under other circumstances. People usually start being lost when they are exactly where they are supposed to be but expect to be somewhere else. We think conceptually of being lost as having gone the wrong way so there is an almost irresistible impulse to change direction when things don't seem to be adding up. Most people who end up lost weren't actually misplaced when they started getting confused. There is a tendency to peer straight ahead. That's where the dangers are, that's where the objectives are, that's where the next landmark is. The most important information is to either side, however. When navigating by dead guessing, course is easier to determine than progress. You should never let any two landmarks on the chart, such as the shores or peaks of islands, come into a range with out at least mentally drawing the line on the chart and confirming that it agrees with your expectations. When I had three, one hour sessions to turn new sailors into rudimentary pilots before turning them loose into the high workload environment of Boston, I skipped time / distance calculations entirely for actual navigation purposes. The boat goes this speed with the outboard at full throttle. Set the dividers on the mile scale, walk them to a quarter, walk back to confirm. Tick of 15 minute segments on the chart with ETA's and guess the rest. I did show them how to use the logarithmic speed scale (this was in the days when a pocket calculator was a bigger investment than a GPS with map is today) and suggested they calculate their speed between know points as often as possible to refine their eyeball speedometer. These boats had no speed instrument. This isn't the way I would necessarily teach a full piloting course. I was faced with creating minimum competence in an inadequate time. In fact though, I used this system for all of my piloting. Years later, when I started learning how to navigate in the air, I was taught exactly the same method. When you have to do all your chart work in 10-15 second gulps between other tasks, it pays to keep everything as simple as possible. -- Roger Long |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
A Commodores Meanderings | General | |||
Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! | ASA | |||
Bobsprit's post to another newsgroup | ASA |