208 lines of repeat?

or was it only 199?




#### ## ## #### ###### ##
## ## ### ## ## ## ## ####
### #### ## ## ## ## ####
### ## #### ## ##### ##
### ## ### ## ## ##
## ## ## ## ## ##
#### ## ## #### #### ##


##### ## ## ## #### ###### ##
## ## #### ### ### ## # ## # ####
## ## ## ## ####### ## ## ####
## ## ## ## ####### ## ## ##
## ## ###### ## # ## ## ## ##
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
##### ## ## ## ## #### #### ##

CaveLamb wrote:
208 lines of repeat?

or was it only 199?




#### ## ## #### ###### ##
## ## ### ## ## ## ## ####
### #### ## ## ## ## ####
### ## #### ## ##### ##
### ## ### ## ## ##
## ## ## ## ## ##
#### ## ## #### #### ##


##### ## ## ## #### ###### ##
## ## #### ### ### ## # ## # ####
## ## ## ## ####### ## ## ####
## ## ## ## ####### ## ## ##
## ## ###### ## # ## ## ## ##
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
##### ## ## ## ## #### #### ##

Well, at least you could spell Damn correctly. :)

In article ,
says...

208 lines of repeat?

or was it only 199?


/compression on
SNIP DAMIT
/compression off

Sorry---I forgot that some people have limited
internet and new reading bandwidth. ;-)
I'm so used to scrolling past the history on some
other groups that I forgot that this group is usually
a bit more concise.

Mark Borgerson

Mark Borgerson wrote:
In article ,
says...
208 lines of repeat?

or was it only 199?


/compression on
SNIP DAMIT
/compression off

Sorry---I forgot that some people have limited
internet and new reading bandwidth. ;-)
I'm so used to scrolling past the history on some
other groups that I forgot that this group is usually
a bit more concise.

Mark Borgerson

Golly, Mark, thanks for being so nice.
THAT'S not normally part of this group.

--

Richard Lamb
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavelamb
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~sv_temptress