On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:54:00 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

"Bruce" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:04:00 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:


You know of whom I speak. Your personal attacks are quite unbefitting a
sailor. The way you act is indicative of the fact that you are a pretend
sailor, IMO.

Personal Attacks?

Exactly! You are trying to bully Jessica B.

Are you the same Willie-boy who is so vindictive toward Joe regarding
the loss of his boat? Are you the same Willie-boy that over the years
has issued the constant stream of utter hogwash castigating anyone who
posts on this site?

Joe was and remains a braggart. He's not learned a thing from his failings.
He brought upon himself his demise for it turns out he was nowhere as good
as his braggadocio would have it. He's too arrogant to admit he overrates
his competence despite the fact that he slapped himself in the face with it.

Ah yes, the pot calling the kettle black; or in more accurate terms
someone who doesn't sail insulting someone who does.


As for the castigation issue, it is the men like you who act like
know-it-alls and who prove with their every amateur posting that nothing
could be further from the truth that I have castigated, and rightfully so,
for the honor and respect sailing and real sailors deserve must be
appropriately given - not to a handful of loud-mouthed pretenders, wannabes
and never-were types.

Wilbur Hubbard


Willie-boy, do you know what the word "irony" means?

Irony is, for example, a bloke squatting on a tiny yellow anchor buoy
thinking he is a sailor.

Cheers,

Bruce

On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:45:47 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

"Stephen Trapani" wrote in message
...
On 3/31/2011 4:32 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:17:59 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

"Wilbur wrote in message
anews.com...

You know of whom I speak. Your personal attacks are quite unbefitting a
sailor. The way you act is indicative of the fact that you are a
pretend
sailor, IMO.


Wilbur Hubbard


And, one more thing. If you were a gentleman you would repent of your
ungentlemanly public behavior and apologize to her forthwith.



Is the Willie-boy that over the years we have all come to know and
loath?

Talking about being a gentleman and apologies?

Naw, it can't be..... that Willie doesn't understand the words. Must
be someone else masquerading as the poor bloke perched on his yellow
anchor buoy, dreaming his dreams of sailing.

Not to mention how much he's ripped women getting anywhere near sailboats.
Now he thinks that by pretending to be a woman he can get people to agree
with him? Hilarious.



Not true! I only object to liberal, feminist women such as Ellen MacArthur
who seem to think they are better sailors than men and generally disprove
their contentions by capsizing and having to be rescued. They don't take
sailing seriously but do it to get publicity and wouldn't do it at all if it
weren't for the publicity and are better off remaining ashore - not only for
their own safety but for the sake of sailing which they tend to marginalize
by their lack of insight and incompetence.

Willie-boy, you are right up full of the brown stuff.

Remember Peggie? and how you insulted her until she left the group?
All, Peggie (who in school boy parlance "had her **** together") did
was correct some of your more outrageous pronouncements and Bam! You
started your harassment and continued until she left the group in
frustration.

So we lost a lady who knew her stuff and are left with a turd.

A woman as a passenger or even as first mate is not a problem on a sailboat.
It's when they try to take over the whole shebang then that's what I find
objectionable. Sailing is and will always remain a man's world.

And, be prepared to swallow your pride and admit you were wrong about
Jessica B who is a real person and not a sock puppet. Proof will be in the
offing in the near future.


Wilbur Hubbard


Willie-boy you lack a classical education and probably don't know
about Occam's razor, often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae,
which is a principle that generally recommends selecting the competing
hypothesis that makes the fewest new assumptions, when the hypotheses
are equal in other respects.

Or in everyday terms, always consider the simplest answer first, and
when considering Willie-boy experience has shown that the simplest
answer is that he doesn't know what he is talking about - ignorance in
action, in other words.

Cheers,

Bruce

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
smo[

Willie-boy, you are right up full of the brown stuff.

Remember Peggie? and how you insulted her until she left the group?
All, Peggie (who in school boy parlance "had her **** together") did
was correct some of your more outrageous pronouncements and Bam! You
started your harassment and continued until she left the group in
frustration.

Peggy Hall was a commercial entity. She only maintained a presense on the
newsgroups to hock her wares. That's NOT the purpose of newsgroup - to
advertise your products and services. If anybody deserved to be called to
task for objectionable behavior it was that obnoxious woman. I say good
riddance to her and her ilk.

So we lost a lady who knew her stuff and are left with a turd.

If you want commercials then watch TV. Stay the hell off Usenet discussion
groups were decent people frown upon Peggy Hall-style spamming.


Willie-boy you lack a classical education and probably don't know
about Occam's razor, often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae,
which is a principle that generally recommends selecting the competing
hypothesis that makes the fewest new assumptions, when the hypotheses
are equal in other respects.

Or in everyday terms, always consider the simplest answer first, and
when considering Willie-boy experience has shown that the simplest
answer is that he doesn't know what he is talking about - ignorance in
action, in other words.


Says the functional illiterate who can't accept the fact that "phony" is the
preferred spelling.


Wilbur Hubbard

On 4/1/2011 4:21 PM, Jessica B wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:56:34 -0700, Stephen Trapani
wrote:

On 3/31/2011 4:32 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:17:59 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

"Wilbur wrote in message
anews.com...

You know of whom I speak. Your personal attacks are quite unbefitting a
sailor. The way you act is indicative of the fact that you are a pretend
sailor, IMO.


Wilbur Hubbard


And, one more thing. If you were a gentleman you would repent of your
ungentlemanly public behavior and apologize to her forthwith.



Is the Willie-boy that over the years we have all come to know and
loath?

Talking about being a gentleman and apologies?

Naw, it can't be..... that Willie doesn't understand the words. Must
be someone else masquerading as the poor bloke perched on his yellow
anchor buoy, dreaming his dreams of sailing.

Not to mention how much he's ripped women getting anywhere near
sailboats. Now he thinks that by pretending to be a woman he can get
people to agree with him? Hilarious.

Stephen

Stephen.. I can assure you that I'm not Wilbur Hubbard. Well, you're
not going to believe me, so I'm not sure why I should have bothered
with this post.

It was easy to figure out. The only people in this newsgroup who like
him and agree with him are the sockpuppets he creates, so... kind of
easy to spot, especially when they are always chiming in on his side of
the argument no matter what the subject. Eventually he then accidentally
posts the wrong guy with the wrong header. It's sad.

Stephen

itchy scalp is a illness that has an effect on the hair follicles, which are
itchy scalp piece of the skin from which hairs grow. In most cases, hair falls out in compact, round patches about the dimension of a quarter. The extent of the hair loss
male pattern baldness varies in some situations, it is only in a several spots. In others, the hair reduction can be larger. From time to time it can entail the total scalp (alopecia totalis) or even all the system and scalp (alopecia universalis). It is not possible to predict how substantially hair will be misplaced. Regrowth of hair in standard alopecia areata is common above a period of time of months or, in some cases, a long time, but are unable to be assured. The hair sometimes regrows white at minimum in the very first instance. Further hair loss is not uncommon. In alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis the likelihood of total regrowth is less.

male pattern baldness is a disorder that affects the hair follicles, which are
alopecia areata part of the skin from which hairs develop. In most circumstances, hair falls out in compact, round patches about the size of a quarter. The extent of the hair reduction
itchy scalp varies in some instances, it is only in a several spots. In some others, the hair loss can be larger. Occasionally it can entail the complete scalp (alopecia totalis) or even all the physique and scalp (alopecia universalis). It is not doable to predict how a lot hair will be lost. Regrowth of hair in regular alopecia areata is common around a period of time of months or, often, a long time, but can't be assured. The hair from time to time regrows white at least in the very first instance. Even more hair loss is not unheard of. In alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis the likelihood of complete regrowth is less.

Помогу убрать проблему. Человек может пропасть безвести, имитация несчастного случая или простое устранение.
Полная анонимность. Дорого. Пишите на serzhkro@gmail(точка)com на форумах нет возможности отвечать.