"Capt. JG" wrote in
easolutions:

Well, if that were all it was, I wouldn't have an argument, but the
context of his comment (all his previous and continuing diatribes
about Zionism, etc.) makes that a weak argument. The words themselves
mean little, but the context of them (especially of the particular
speaker - any speaker) are highly important to that understanding.



Without Zionism, America wouldn't be in the ****ty position it is in
today, fighting Israel's wars for them.

Iraqis and Afghans aren't near the threat to America that the now-
nuclear-weapon-carrying-submarined Zionist state is. Every one of you
Americans are now in range of Israeli nuclear weapons, thanks to the
Germans who sold them 5 submarines for their delivery, any place on the
planet.



--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry

"Larry" wrote in message
...
"Capt. JG" wrote in
easolutions:

Well, if that were all it was, I wouldn't have an argument, but the
context of his comment (all his previous and continuing diatribes
about Zionism, etc.) makes that a weak argument. The words themselves
mean little, but the context of them (especially of the particular
speaker - any speaker) are highly important to that understanding.



Without Zionism, America wouldn't be in the ****ty position it is in
today, fighting Israel's wars for them.

Iraqis and Afghans aren't near the threat to America that the now-
nuclear-weapon-carrying-submarined Zionist state is. Every one of you
Americans are now in range of Israeli nuclear weapons, thanks to the
Germans who sold them 5 submarines for their delivery, any place on the
planet.



--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry



Why don't you tell us again how Hitler didn't finish the job.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
easolutions...
"Larry" wrote in message
...
"Capt. JG" wrote in
easolutions:

Well, if that were all it was, I wouldn't have an argument, but the
context of his comment (all his previous and continuing diatribes
about Zionism, etc.) makes that a weak argument. The words themselves
mean little, but the context of them (especially of the particular
speaker - any speaker) are highly important to that understanding.



Without Zionism, America wouldn't be in the ****ty position it is in
today, fighting Israel's wars for them.

Iraqis and Afghans aren't near the threat to America that the now-
nuclear-weapon-carrying-submarined Zionist state is. Every one of you
Americans are now in range of Israeli nuclear weapons, thanks to the
Germans who sold them 5 submarines for their delivery, any place on the
planet.



--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry



Why don't you tell us again how Hitler didn't finish the job.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com






Why don't YOU tell us again how Timothy O'Leary didn't finish the job?

--
Gregory Hall

On 2/28/10 5:30 PM, Larry wrote:
"Capt. wrote in
easolutions:

Well, if that were all it was, I wouldn't have an argument, but the
context of his comment (all his previous and continuing diatribes
about Zionism, etc.) makes that a weak argument. The words themselves
mean little, but the context of them (especially of the particular
speaker - any speaker) are highly important to that understanding.



Without Zionism, America wouldn't be in the ****ty position it is in
today, fighting Israel's wars for them.

Iraqis and Afghans aren't near the threat to America that the now-
nuclear-weapon-carrying-submarined Zionist state is. Every one of you
Americans are now in range of Israeli nuclear weapons, thanks to the
Germans who sold them 5 submarines for their delivery, any place on the
planet.





Larry "thinks" the Israelis are going to attack the U.S.

So, Larry, you would have been happier if the Germans had been able to
complete the final solution, eh?

On Feb 26, 12:23*pm, Larry wrote:
Joe wrote in news:79711f1e-f9e8-4e35-bd25-
:

It's bad JuJu to count your eggs at sea.

Joe

Talking about money, wouldn't that be bad JewJew?

--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry

Sheeze Larry

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBYufgDZBxs
Juju's the place you dont want to go.

Joe

On Feb 26, 11:36*am, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:
"Joe" wrote in message

...

I'd be happy to send her a bag or two free Nellie.

In fact, if you ever left your rum soaked barco lounger and sailed
anywhere I'd send you a bag too. But that's never going to happen is
it?

If you were smart, you'd send her a couple bags of the boat blend and ask
how much it would cost to be a future sponsor. I told you to begin with that
she's a winner. I know sailing talent when I see it. That's one reason I got
so disillusioned with you, Joe. I thought you had sailing talent but you
proved otherwise. How can I ever forgive you for making me look so stupid?

Now, don't you go around trying to jinx Jessica. Like you said, she isn't
home yet and anything can happen. Somebody needs to warn her to not count
her chickens before they hatch. If she gets complacent she could end up not
making it.

Wilbur Hubbard
(typing and wirelessly sending from the desk aboard my blue water yacht,
'Cut the Mustard')

Sorry Nellie, we do not sell "blends" just single source estate coffee
hand picked and selected with care. We do this to provide our
customers with bold yet smooth as velvet flavors. Our "Boat Roast" is
a Costa Rican Coffee from the Tres Rio's region. Robust in body, deep
in flavor, bursting with aroma.

Looks like Jessica did not "cut a deal with the Devil" and rounded the
horn staying a hundred miles or so offshore. She's on the home stretch
now.

Joe

On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:43:29 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Bruce" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:35:07 -0500, Harry
wrote:

On 2/27/10 7:57 PM, Capt. JG wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:03:05 -0800, Stephen Trapani
wrote:

Larry wrote:
"Capt. wrote in news:zP-dncsy_
reasolutions:

wrote in message
...
wrote in
news:79711f1e-f9e8-4e35-bd25-
:

It's bad JuJu to count your eggs at sea.

Joe


Talking about money, wouldn't that be bad JewJew?


--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry


Larry, your racism really has no place here or anywhere.


Why isn't anyone allowed to make a JOKE with the word JEW in it?

Am I supposed to feel guilty? I don't.

If I make a joke about Baptists, noone complains. Why only Jews?

A derogatory joke about Jews is racist, a derogatory joke about
Baptists
is not racist. Pretty simple. If you were consistently derisive about
any other race, like Africans or Asians, you'd be getting the same
grief, maybe more.

Stephen


I suggest that your statement is incorrect. Do some research on the
type of jokes told in the Catskill resorts, commonly known as the
Borsch Belt. Or read up on current Israeli humor. You will find that
the jokes are far more vicious then the rather innocuous remarks made
by Larry.

And, if you think that a joke about Baptists can't be derogatory have
a look at N. Irish humor, or even British, for that matter who not
only differentiate between "church" and "chapel" but also proper
schools and "red brick universities".

And is you want to hear really vicious ethnic humor listen to the
Chinese, if you want to talk about Asians.

In fact I have never been anywhere that the "people" didn't talk about
the "other people". I don't know that condemning something that
appears to be universal is entirely logical.


Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)


I think there's a big difference between Borsch Belt humor and the many
racist comments Larry's made over the last, say, year. Perhaps you
missed
them. I think Stephen recalls them, which was why he commented. I
certainly
do. I called Larry on them then, and I do now.



The old borscht belt humor was about Jews telling jokes about Jews to
other Jews. Larry's anti-Jewish comments and "jokes" are grounded in his
anti-Semitism.


Ah.. rather a prejudgment isn't that? Larry is anti-Semitic and thus
if he uses the word "Jew" twice in a row it is bad?

Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)


Nope... dozens of times, probably more than that. Read through some of his
previous posts where he said A.H. didn't finish the job, etc.


As I have commented, you are judging Larry based on how you perceive
him based on his activities.. of course, the Southerner who see
indolent Negro and conceives the notion that Negros are lazy, or the
Australian who sees Aborigines reeling drunk in the streets and
conceives the notion that Black-fellows are worthless, or the Thai who
observes that drunken tourists groping the prostitute and conceives
that foreigners are really pretty sleazy people are prejudicial.
Right?

Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)

Larry wrote:
"Capt. JG" wrote in
easolutions:

Well, if that were all it was, I wouldn't have an argument, but the
context of his comment (all his previous and continuing diatribes
about Zionism, etc.) makes that a weak argument. The words themselves
mean little, but the context of them (especially of the particular
speaker - any speaker) are highly important to that understanding.



Without Zionism, America wouldn't be in the ****ty position it is in
today, fighting Israel's wars for them.

Sure they would. America is in the position of having to defend numerous
democracies against numerous different tyrannies. Israel is only one of
many. One of the best, but one of many.

Iraqis and Afghans aren't near the threat to America that the now-
nuclear-weapon-carrying-submarined Zionist state is. Every one of you
Americans are now in range of Israeli nuclear weapons, thanks to the
Germans who sold them 5 submarines for their delivery, any place on the
planet.

Woops. Slipping into kook mode again. Real democracies have never fought
significant wars against each other and probably never will.

Stephen

On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:33:05 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Bruce" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:53:51 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:37:49 -0500, " Gregory Hall"
wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
news:gdOdnQvhVJAU_RTWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@posted. bayareasolutions...
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:00:41 -0800, "Capt. JG"

wrote:

"Larry" wrote in message
31.13...
"Capt. JG" wrote in news:zP-dncsy_
reasolutions:

"Larry" wrote in message
...
Joe wrote in
news:79711f1e-f9e8-4e35-bd25-
:

It's bad JuJu to count your eggs at sea.

Joe



Talking about money, wouldn't that be bad JewJew?


--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry



Larry, your racism really has no place here or anywhere.


Why isn't anyone allowed to make a JOKE with the word JEW in it?

Am I supposed to feel guilty? I don't.

If I make a joke about Baptists, noone complains. Why only Jews?


--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry



Larry, you can make jokes about anyone you want. The problem is that
your
history of racially motivated attacks is pretty clear, so your claim
about
making jokes about other groups is a load of crap. Do what you want.
I'm
not
your mother, but I certainly am not going to just let it slide
without
saying anything.


And this is the News Group that has nurtured Wilbur for all these
years.


Albert


Albert, I don't think nurtured is the right word, but I see your
point.
I've spoken out about this sort of behavior previously.

And rather proves the validity of my previous statement. I don't see
Larry saying those things about the Jews.... shoot, he doesn't even
say those kind of things about Wilbur-Gregory-whatever.


Albert


I can't imagine anyone here condoning Neal's behavior, and his continued
harassment of me _is_ a prime example. It's an individual attack and has
nothing to do with the subject of racism, at least nothing I can
determine.

If you look at some of the stuff Larry's posted, you'll find he's said
some
pretty vile things about Jews. But, believe what you want. I'm not going
to
repeat them.

He popped up with his racist crap, and I called him on it. You seem to
have
a problem with the latter, so whatever floats your boat.


Nope, you got it wrong. I wasn't saying that Larry shouldn't be
condemned, rather that if one individual is to be condemned for
something then equally everyone should be condemned if they, in this
case, bad mouth someone then condemn them, but don't let another
individual get away with the same sort of actions.

I remember Wilbur insulting Peggy until she vanished from the scene
however I don't remember legions leaping out of the woodwork to
condemn Wilbur.

If you select one individual for using a word that you don't care for
and fail to condemn every other who does essentially the same thing,
then that rather smacks of prejudice doesn't it?


Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)


I don't think you can use the example of Neal being a jerk or harassing
someone as an argument against condemnation of racial prejudice. You can't
equate one-on-one harassment with condemning a whole group of people based
on the color of their skin or their ethnic heritage. At least I don't see
how they're in any way comparable. What Neal did to Peggy was reprehensible,
and several people did come to her defense, but that's not "essentially" the
same thing. I'm not sure of your definition of legions. It's a pretty small
newsgroup.

In any case, I've said what I believe. If you believe something different,
fine.


Well, we agree on one thing anyway :-)

Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)

On 2/28/10 9:19 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:43:29 -0800, "Capt.
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:35:07 -0500,
wrote:

On 2/27/10 7:57 PM, Capt. JG wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:03:05 -0800, Stephen Trapani
wrote:

Larry wrote:
"Capt. wrote in news:zP-dncsy_
reasolutions:

wrote in message
...
wrote in
news:79711f1e-f9e8-4e35-bd25-
:

It's bad JuJu to count your eggs at sea.

Joe


Talking about money, wouldn't that be bad JewJew?


--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry


Larry, your racism really has no place here or anywhere.


Why isn't anyone allowed to make a JOKE with the word JEW in it?

Am I supposed to feel guilty? I don't.

If I make a joke about Baptists, noone complains. Why only Jews?

A derogatory joke about Jews is racist, a derogatory joke about
Baptists
is not racist. Pretty simple. If you were consistently derisive about
any other race, like Africans or Asians, you'd be getting the same
grief, maybe more.

Stephen


I suggest that your statement is incorrect. Do some research on the
type of jokes told in the Catskill resorts, commonly known as the
Borsch Belt. Or read up on current Israeli humor. You will find that
the jokes are far more vicious then the rather innocuous remarks made
by Larry.

And, if you think that a joke about Baptists can't be derogatory have
a look at N. Irish humor, or even British, for that matter who not
only differentiate between "church" and "chapel" but also proper
schools and "red brick universities".

And is you want to hear really vicious ethnic humor listen to the
Chinese, if you want to talk about Asians.

In fact I have never been anywhere that the "people" didn't talk about
the "other people". I don't know that condemning something that
appears to be universal is entirely logical.


Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)


I think there's a big difference between Borsch Belt humor and the many
racist comments Larry's made over the last, say, year. Perhaps you
missed
them. I think Stephen recalls them, which was why he commented. I
certainly
do. I called Larry on them then, and I do now.



The old borscht belt humor was about Jews telling jokes about Jews to
other Jews. Larry's anti-Jewish comments and "jokes" are grounded in his
anti-Semitism.


Ah.. rather a prejudgment isn't that? Larry is anti-Semitic and thus
if he uses the word "Jew" twice in a row it is bad?

Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)


Nope... dozens of times, probably more than that. Read through some of his
previous posts where he said A.H. didn't finish the job, etc.


As I have commented, you are judging Larry based on how you perceive
him based on his activities.. of course, the Southerner who see
indolent Negro and conceives the notion that Negros are lazy, or the
Australian who sees Aborigines reeling drunk in the streets and
conceives the notion that Black-fellows are worthless, or the Thai who
observes that drunken tourists groping the prostitute and conceives
that foreigners are really pretty sleazy people are prejudicial.
Right?

Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)


Oh, please...what we don't need is a misinformed, misguided apologetica
for Larry's hatred of jews.