Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote:
KLC Lewis wrote: Never argue bouyancy with Roger Long. ;-) Why? I think Roger is making a big deal of a very fine distinction. Its true that an object that is said to be "buoyant" does not generate a force by itself, the force really comes from water pressure which in turn is caused by gravity. But, the force is real and buoyancy is simply a convenient way to aggregate the net pressure on an object. If there were no force (regardless of what we call it) holding up a ship, it would sink. There are, of course, imaginary forces, such as Coriolis which appears in non-inertial reference frames, but that is a different thing. Budding naval architects should teach themselves the rudiments of dimensional analysis... and then they won't make appalling cockups in their use of incompatible units. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imaginary lobster? | General | |||
Another Great Day on an Imaginary Boat | General | |||
Imaginary boat found! | Cruising | |||
Buoyancy + other links | Cruising | |||
Buoyancy Foam | Boat Building |