| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#29
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Basically it is fairly simple to design a safe vehicle, or an efficient vehicle, or a non-contaminating vehicle. The problem is that the car buying public doesn't want one. I think most people (except for complete idiots) would prefer a more efficient vehicle but the car companies aren't force by the Gov't to increase efficiency so they don't. I was at a neighbors BBQ right about the time gas had reached $3/gal. We were talking about fuel mileage (of course) and another neighbor quipped that the hybrid vehicles were something, getting 35 mpg. My thought was that the car companies had the hybrid technology sitting on the shelf waiting for the oil people to give us the shaft, which made the new cars pretty attractive. This guy is about 10 years younger than my 49 and so doesn't remember the Datsun B210 or the similar model Toyota getting mid to high 30s in the 70s fuel crunch. What other reason could there be for fuel efficiency not to have improved? After that time in the 70s it actually went backwards. I know emmision controls rob some power but we have computer controlled fuel injection now. Was this created just so that we would have to take our cars to the shop instead of working on them ourselves? When people scream conspiracy, I think they're at least half right. The rest is just crap goverment. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Lake Superior dropping and warming, fishing and boating effected | General | |||
| Lake Superior Powerboat Chartering | Cruising | |||
| Puts Lake Superior to shame | ASA | |||
| Lake Superior - Michipicoten Bay - needs your assistance | Touring | |||
| Lake Superior - Michipicoten Bay - needs your assistance | Whitewater | |||