|
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote:
A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? Just because somebody recognizes my obvious genius does not mean they are me. -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? Just because somebody recognizes my obvious genius does not mean they are me. 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? Just because somebody recognizes my obvious genius does not mean they are me. * Poor Marcia! Suffering from classic symptoms of paranoid delusional thinking. To wit: 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. * So do dozens, if not hundreds of other folks. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. * Piltdown Man was a hoax. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. * I also don't bother denying that I'm a woman. Anybody who looks at me and sees a woman is beyond reasoning with. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. * Millions use free news servers. Did Piltdown use Motzarella? If so, how can Piltdown be me when Motzarella has booted old Greg? 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. * Like millions of other intelligent folks. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. * I use no fewer than six (count them -6) different clients. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. * Using another 'company' laptop with Vista Home Premium which comes with Windows Mail as part of the OS. Get with the program, Marcia. I'm brilliant and recognized as such by many. -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:32:53 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? Just because somebody recognizes my obvious genius does not mean they are me. It substantially reduces the number of other possibilities, though. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 10:22 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. We have your word for that, which is known to be worthless. OTOH, we have circumstantial evidence that suggests Piltdown Man is, indeed, you. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. See above. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. * So do dozens, if not hundreds of other folks. Really? Name three people other than you who post to alt.usenet.kooks AND rec.boats.cruising AND alt.sailing.asa AND alt.free.newsservers, AND who has an actual posting history, AND who believes you're a genius. Hell, name ONE. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. * Piltdown Man was a hoax, just like my sock. That's what I thought. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. * I also don't bother denying that I'm a woman. Welcome to the sisterhood. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. * Millions use free news servers. Did Piltdown use Motzarella? If so, how can Piltdown be me when Motzarella has booted old Greg? There are ways around that. 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. * Like millions of other intelligent folks. But also like ALL of your socks. Most new and casual posters aren't savvy enough, or concerned enough to hide their IP addresses. In fact, most new and casual posters don't know how to read a head, much less know what an IP address is. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. * I use no fewer than six (count them -6) different clients. lol. That point tends to support my claim more than yours. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. * Using another 'company' laptop with Vista Home Premium which comes with Windows Mail as part of the OS. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't disqualify the statement. Get with the program, Marcia. I'm brilliant and recognized as such by many. You're a known narcissist who believes himself brilliant. Most other (real) posters who bother to comment seem to think you're some variation on liar, idiot and tool. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 10:22 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. We have your word for that, which is known to be worthless. OTOH, we have circumstantial evidence that suggests Piltdown Man is, indeed, you. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. See above. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. * So do dozens, if not hundreds of other folks. Really? Name three people other than you who post to alt.usenet.kooks AND rec.boats.cruising AND alt.sailing.asa AND alt.free.newsservers, AND who has an actual posting history, AND who believes you're a genius. Hell, name ONE. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. * Piltdown Man was a hoax, just like my sock. That's what I thought. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. * I also don't bother denying that I'm a woman. Welcome to the sisterhood. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. * Millions use free news servers. Did Piltdown use Motzarella? If so, how can Piltdown be me when Motzarella has booted old Greg? There are ways around that. 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. * Like millions of other intelligent folks. But also like ALL of your socks. Most new and casual posters aren't savvy enough, or concerned enough to hide their IP addresses. In fact, most new and casual posters don't know how to read a head, much less know what an IP address is. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. * I use no fewer than six (count them -6) different clients. lol. That point tends to support my claim more than yours. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. * Using another 'company' laptop with Vista Home Premium which comes with Windows Mail as part of the OS. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't disqualify the statement. Get with the program, Marcia. I'm brilliant and recognized as such by many. You're a known narcissist who believes himself brilliant. Most other (real) posters who bother to comment seem to think you're some variation on liar, idiot and tool. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. Proof of any of your lame assertions (buttressed with post editing) is still non-existent. Do you know anything about time stamps? Bwahahhahahahhahahah. -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
Gregory Hall wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? Just because somebody recognizes my obvious genius does not mean they are me. Um, yeah. It does. Stephen |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 10:53 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 10:22 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. We have your word for that, which is known to be worthless. OTOH, we have circumstantial evidence that suggests Piltdown Man is, indeed, you. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. See above. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. * So do dozens, if not hundreds of other folks. Really? Name three people other than you who post to alt.usenet.kooks AND rec.boats.cruising AND alt.sailing.asa AND alt.free.newsservers, AND who has an actual posting history, AND who believes you're a genius. Hell, name ONE. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. * Piltdown Man was a hoax, just like my sock. That's what I thought. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. * I also don't bother denying that I'm a woman. Welcome to the sisterhood. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. * Millions use free news servers. Did Piltdown use Motzarella? If so, how can Piltdown be me when Motzarella has booted old Greg? There are ways around that. 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. * Like millions of other intelligent folks. But also like ALL of your socks. Most new and casual posters aren't savvy enough, or concerned enough to hide their IP addresses. In fact, most new and casual posters don't know how to read a head, much less know what an IP address is. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. * I use no fewer than six (count them -6) different clients. lol. That point tends to support my claim more than yours. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. * Using another 'company' laptop with Vista Home Premium which comes with Windows Mail as part of the OS. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't disqualify the statement. Get with the program, Marcia. I'm brilliant and recognized as such by many. You're a known narcissist who believes himself brilliant. Most other (real) posters who bother to comment seem to think you're some variation on liar, idiot and tool. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. Proof of any of your lame assertions (buttressed with post editing) is still non-existent. Post-editing? What is this thing you speak of? (One transparent lie deserves another). Do you know anything about time stamps? Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Yeah. They can be faked. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. You can also set certain newsreaders to post at specific times. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. This continues to be true, despite your denial and attempted obfuscations. -- Gregory Hall is a tool. Yeah, we know. If he was "brilliant" he wouldn't trail clues behind him like breadcrumbs. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 10:53 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 10:22 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. We have your word for that, which is known to be worthless. OTOH, we have circumstantial evidence that suggests Piltdown Man is, indeed, you. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. See above. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. * So do dozens, if not hundreds of other folks. Really? Name three people other than you who post to alt.usenet.kooks AND rec.boats.cruising AND alt.sailing.asa AND alt.free.newsservers, AND who has an actual posting history, AND who believes you're a genius. Hell, name ONE. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. * Piltdown Man was a hoax, just like my sock. That's what I thought. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. * I also don't bother denying that I'm a woman. Welcome to the sisterhood. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. * Millions use free news servers. Did Piltdown use Motzarella? If so, how can Piltdown be me when Motzarella has booted old Greg? There are ways around that. 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. * Like millions of other intelligent folks. But also like ALL of your socks. Most new and casual posters aren't savvy enough, or concerned enough to hide their IP addresses. In fact, most new and casual posters don't know how to read a head, much less know what an IP address is. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. * I use no fewer than six (count them -6) different clients. lol. That point tends to support my claim more than yours. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. * Using another 'company' laptop with Vista Home Premium which comes with Windows Mail as part of the OS. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't disqualify the statement. Get with the program, Marcia. I'm brilliant and recognized as such by many. You're a known narcissist who believes himself brilliant. Most other (real) posters who bother to comment seem to think you're some variation on liar, idiot and tool. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. Proof of any of your lame assertions (buttressed with post editing) is still non-existent. Post-editing? What is this thing you speak of? (One transparent lie deserves another). Do you know anything about time stamps? Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Yeah. They can be faked. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. You can also set certain newsreaders to post at specific times. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. This continues to be true, despite your denial and attempted obfuscations. -- Gregory Hall is a tool. Yeah, we know. If he was "brilliant" he wouldn't trail clues behind him like breadcrumbs. Only birdbrains like you follow a false trail. -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 11:09 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 10:53 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 10:22 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. We have your word for that, which is known to be worthless. OTOH, we have circumstantial evidence that suggests Piltdown Man is, indeed, you. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. See above. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. * So do dozens, if not hundreds of other folks. Really? Name three people other than you who post to alt.usenet.kooks AND rec.boats.cruising AND alt.sailing.asa AND alt.free.newsservers, AND who has an actual posting history, AND who believes you're a genius. Hell, name ONE. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. * Piltdown Man was a hoax, just like my sock. That's what I thought. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. * I also don't bother denying that I'm a woman. Welcome to the sisterhood. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. * Millions use free news servers. Did Piltdown use Motzarella? If so, how can Piltdown be me when Motzarella has booted old Greg? There are ways around that. 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. * Like millions of other intelligent folks. But also like ALL of your socks. Most new and casual posters aren't savvy enough, or concerned enough to hide their IP addresses. In fact, most new and casual posters don't know how to read a head, much less know what an IP address is. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. * I use no fewer than six (count them -6) different clients. lol. That point tends to support my claim more than yours. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. * Using another 'company' laptop with Vista Home Premium which comes with Windows Mail as part of the OS. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't disqualify the statement. Get with the program, Marcia. I'm brilliant and recognized as such by many. You're a known narcissist who believes himself brilliant. Most other (real) posters who bother to comment seem to think you're some variation on liar, idiot and tool. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. Proof of any of your lame assertions (buttressed with post editing) is still non-existent. Post-editing? What is this thing you speak of? (One transparent lie deserves another). Do you know anything about time stamps? Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Yeah. They can be faked. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. You can also set certain newsreaders to post at specific times. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. This continues to be true, despite your denial and attempted obfuscations. -- Gregory Hall is a tool. Yeah, we know. If he was "brilliant" he wouldn't trail clues behind him like breadcrumbs. Only birdbrains like you follow a false trail. -- Gregory Hall Only idiots like you continue to lie in the face of overwhelming evidence. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message ... Only idiots like you continue to lie in the face of overwhelming evidence. Are you in love with him? It looks like you're stalking him to me. Gregory Hall is damned smart. I'd agree with Piltdown Man that he's a genius. Harry Harris |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 11:09 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 10:53 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 10:22 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. We have your word for that, which is known to be worthless. OTOH, we have circumstantial evidence that suggests Piltdown Man is, indeed, you. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. See above. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. * So do dozens, if not hundreds of other folks. Really? Name three people other than you who post to alt.usenet.kooks AND rec.boats.cruising AND alt.sailing.asa AND alt.free.newsservers, AND who has an actual posting history, AND who believes you're a genius. Hell, name ONE. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. * Piltdown Man was a hoax, just like my sock. That's what I thought. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. * I also don't bother denying that I'm a woman. Welcome to the sisterhood. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. * Millions use free news servers. Did Piltdown use Motzarella? If so, how can Piltdown be me when Motzarella has booted old Greg? There are ways around that. 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. * Like millions of other intelligent folks. But also like ALL of your socks. Most new and casual posters aren't savvy enough, or concerned enough to hide their IP addresses. In fact, most new and casual posters don't know how to read a head, much less know what an IP address is. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. * I use no fewer than six (count them -6) different clients. lol. That point tends to support my claim more than yours. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. * Using another 'company' laptop with Vista Home Premium which comes with Windows Mail as part of the OS. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't disqualify the statement. Get with the program, Marcia. I'm brilliant and recognized as such by many. You're a known narcissist who believes himself brilliant. Most other (real) posters who bother to comment seem to think you're some variation on liar, idiot and tool. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. Proof of any of your lame assertions (buttressed with post editing) is still non-existent. Post-editing? What is this thing you speak of? (One transparent lie deserves another). Do you know anything about time stamps? Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Yeah. They can be faked. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. You can also set certain newsreaders to post at specific times. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. This continues to be true, despite your denial and attempted obfuscations. -- Gregory Hall is a tool. Yeah, we know. If he was "brilliant" he wouldn't trail clues behind him like breadcrumbs. Only birdbrains like you follow a false trail. -- Gregory Hall Only idiots like you continue to lie in the face of overwhelming evidence. Only paranoid folks like you see a gremlin behind every tree! -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
Attention everybody! This new Gregory Hall using Windows Mail is a fake. A
forgery. A liar. Check out MY headers for this post and compare them to the imposter's. Probably Burnore or somebody like that forging my headers. Calls me an abuser and look what he or one of his pals do. -- Gregory Hall ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Gregory Hall" wrote in message ... "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 11:09 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 10:53 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 10:22 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 9:32 am, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 5, 10:08 pm, "Piltdown Man" wrote: A brilliant genius! Sez a sock with seven posts to its name, all in groups where Gregory Hall/Capt. Neal hangs out. Pitiful when you have to sock up to boost your own ego. relevant groups added Proof that Piltdown Man is a Gregory Hall sock???? 1) The only person who thinks you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. We have your word for that, which is known to be worthless. OTOH, we have circumstantial evidence that suggests Piltdown Man is, indeed, you. 2) The only person who posts that you're a genius is *you*. * Obviously not because Piltdown Man is not me. See above. 3) Only posted this message to AUK, yet frequents the other groups you do. * So do dozens, if not hundreds of other folks. Really? Name three people other than you who post to alt.usenet.kooks AND rec.boats.cruising AND alt.sailing.asa AND alt.free.newsservers, AND who has an actual posting history, AND who believes you're a genius. Hell, name ONE. 3) Piltdown Man was also a fraud. * Piltdown Man was a hoax, just like my sock. That's what I thought. 4) Request for proof; lack of denial. * I also don't bother denying that I'm a woman. Welcome to the sisterhood. 5) Uses a free news server, like all your other socks. * Millions use free news servers. Did Piltdown use Motzarella? If so, how can Piltdown be me when Motzarella has booted old Greg? There are ways around that. 6) Hidden IP address, like all your other socks. * Like millions of other intelligent folks. But also like ALL of your socks. Most new and casual posters aren't savvy enough, or concerned enough to hide their IP addresses. In fact, most new and casual posters don't know how to read a head, much less know what an IP address is. 7) Uses Outlook Express, like you usually do. * I use no fewer than six (count them -6) different clients. lol. That point tends to support my claim more than yours. 8) You have uncharacteristically used Microsoft Mail to respond to my post, in order to cover up the similarities between your header and the sock's header. * Using another 'company' laptop with Vista Home Premium which comes with Windows Mail as part of the OS. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't disqualify the statement. Get with the program, Marcia. I'm brilliant and recognized as such by many. You're a known narcissist who believes himself brilliant. Most other (real) posters who bother to comment seem to think you're some variation on liar, idiot and tool. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. Proof of any of your lame assertions (buttressed with post editing) is still non-existent. Post-editing? What is this thing you speak of? (One transparent lie deserves another). Do you know anything about time stamps? Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Yeah. They can be faked. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. You can also set certain newsreaders to post at specific times. Bwahahhahahahhahahah. Statistical probability that *all* of your stated conditions are met approaches nil. This continues to be true, despite your denial and attempted obfuscations. -- Gregory Hall is a tool. Yeah, we know. If he was "brilliant" he wouldn't trail clues behind him like breadcrumbs. Only birdbrains like you follow a false trail. -- Gregory Hall Only idiots like you continue to lie in the face of overwhelming evidence. Only paranoid folks like you see a gremlin behind every tree! -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 11:30 am, "Harry Harris"
wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... Only idiots like you continue to lie in the face of overwhelming evidence. Are you in love with him? It looks like you're stalking him to me. Gregory Hall is damned smart. I'd agree with Piltdown Man that he's a genius. Harry Harris That's because you're another of Greg's socks, Greg... er... I mean, "Harry." And no, I'm not "stalking" you; I'm replying to public messages in a public newsgroup. Pointing out your idiocy can be fun; you're like a kook with training wheels. I may eventually graduate to more sophisticated kooks. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 11:30 am, "Harry Harris" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... Only idiots like you continue to lie in the face of overwhelming evidence. Are you in love with him? It looks like you're stalking him to me. Gregory Hall is damned smart. I'd agree with Piltdown Man that he's a genius. Harry Harris That's because you're another of Greg's socks, Greg... er... I mean, "Harry." And no, I'm not "stalking" you; I'm replying to public messages in a public newsgroup. Pointing out your idiocy can be fun; you're like a kook with training wheels. I may eventually graduate to more sophisticated kooks. Twilight Zone toonz! http://tzone.the-croc.com/sounds/twiltzon.mid :-) Harry Harris |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
|
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote:
In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 10:35*am, Kali wrote:
In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. -- Kali actually,hmmmmm the first sting of action RE,of course would be my absence the thrill of having bitches fulfill their own worse nightmare would be an Master Piece* additional to fit for second n thirds mantra givens of course, there's will am all manner of dynamical debacles the hollow horror, gigantic, of forsaken an continuum withs an living oak grand master sounds cool,maybe i should bwahahahahaha tsk tsk hobbits. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. Doesn't apply to me, Jack. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 1:35 pm, Kali wrote:
In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. -- Kali Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. Once on disability = always a leach. Even if you can't work because of a disability it's your family's responsibility or the responsibility of church and charities if you have no family members. Why has it become your RIGHT to force me as a taxpayer to take care of you because you are disabled, in many cases self-inflected either by stupidity or sloth. (I use 'you' figuratively speaking this isn't necessarily meant as a personal attack.) How about you liberals reach into your OWN pockets for money and take your filthy hands out of mine? -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
|
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 3:14 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. Once on disability = always a leach. Even if you can't work because of a disability it's your family's responsibility or the responsibility of church and charities if you have no family members. Why has it become your RIGHT to force me as a taxpayer to take care of you because you are disabled, in many cases self-inflected either by stupidity or sloth. (I use 'you' figuratively speaking this isn't necessarily meant as a personal attack.) How about you liberals reach into your OWN pockets for money and take your filthy hands out of mine? -- Gregory Hall Why is it conservatives' arguments always seem to assume liberals don't practice what they preach? *Everyone* who works pays into Social Security, not just Republicans. I pay into it; disabled people (in most cases) paid into it before they became disabled. You don't like welfare and disability; I'm not particularly happy about how much money we spend on the military, particularly on the war in Iraq, where we never should have gone to begin with. I'm not happy about underwriting corporate welfare, or the fact that my tax dollars were partially used to subsidize year-end bonuses for the financial "geniuses" who were largely responsible for the current state of our economy. We individual taxpayers don't get to pick and choose how our dollars are spent. We're all stuck paying for some programs and policies we don't personally support. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 3:17 pm, Kali wrote:
In article f70e74df-b388-404b-a159-6058fcc87008 @i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com, says... On Feb 6, 1:35 pm, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. -- Kali Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. There, but for the grace of their own feared God, go right wingers. -- Kali Absolutely true; denial's a wonderful thing. Not a single one of those wingnuts would turn down SSDI if they needed it. It's always the "other guy" who's leaching off the system. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and who doesn't? You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc. A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps. You know about whom I am talking. And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control, abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies". -- Kali With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against of those left-wing abominations, Hillary. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:06:47 -0800 (PST), marcia
wrote: On Feb 6, 1:35 pm, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. -- Kali Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. Actually, the crystal ball is the Social Security Act and duly-promulgated regulations. Both for determining disability initially and whether it continues. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:17:59 -0500, Kali wrote:
In article f70e74df-b388-404b-a159-6058fcc87008 , says... On Feb 6, 1:35 pm, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. -- Kali Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. There, but for the grace of their own feared God, go right wingers. Right-wingers become disabled too. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:00:03 -0800 (PST), marcia
wrote: On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote: Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. Doesn't apply to me, Jack. What *does* seem to apply to you is the mindset that an employee of SSA must necessarily buy into all facets of socialism. That's what I infer from the initial statement above. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 3:34 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:00:03 -0800 (PST), marcia wrote: On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote: Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. Doesn't apply to me, Jack. What *does* seem to apply to you is the mindset that an employee of SSA must necessarily buy into all facets of socialism. That's what I infer from the initial statement above. Curious why you chose to respond to my statement in *this* thread, where it's completely non-sequitur, rather in the *original* thread? |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:39:16 -0800 (PST), marcia
wrote: On Feb 6, 3:34 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote: On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:00:03 -0800 (PST), marcia wrote: On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote: Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. Doesn't apply to me, Jack. What *does* seem to apply to you is the mindset that an employee of SSA must necessarily buy into all facets of socialism. That's what I infer from the initial statement above. Curious why you chose to respond to my statement in *this* thread, where it's completely non-sequitur, rather in the *original* thread? Couldn't find it. But I remember the smarmy statement and meant to respond but forgot. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 3:14 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. Once on disability = always a leach. Even if you can't work because of a disability it's your family's responsibility or the responsibility of church and charities if you have no family members. Why has it become your RIGHT to force me as a taxpayer to take care of you because you are disabled, in many cases self-inflected either by stupidity or sloth. (I use 'you' figuratively speaking this isn't necessarily meant as a personal attack.) How about you liberals reach into your OWN pockets for money and take your filthy hands out of mine? -- Gregory Hall Why is it conservatives' arguments always seem to assume liberals don't practice what they preach? *Everyone* who works pays into Social Security, not just Republicans. I pay into it; disabled people (in most cases) paid into it before they became disabled. You don't like welfare and disability; I'm not particularly happy about how much money we spend on the military, particularly on the war in Iraq, where we never should have gone to begin with. I'm not happy about underwriting corporate welfare, or the fact that my tax dollars were partially used to subsidize year-end bonuses for the financial "geniuses" who were largely responsible for the current state of our economy. We individual taxpayers don't get to pick and choose how our dollars are spent. We're all stuck paying for some programs and policies we don't personally support. Why is that, Marcia? Well, the answer is simple. It is liberals and socialists who forced these welfare programs on everybody. Conservatives want nothing to do with them but are forced to contribute anyway. So when I say take your filthy hands out of my pocket and reach into your own instead you liberals say, "**** you - we're gonna make everybody pay whether they want to or not." In other words charity doesn't start at home for a liberal. Charity starts by reaching into somebody else's pocket. It's all too easy being generous with somebody else's money, isn't it. But when it comes to donating your own you liberals are such a stingy lot. http://digg.com/politics/Conservativ...als_as_a_whole That's the difference. -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 3:14 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. Once on disability = always a leach. Even if you can't work because of a disability it's your family's responsibility or the responsibility of church and charities if you have no family members. Why has it become your RIGHT to force me as a taxpayer to take care of you because you are disabled, in many cases self-inflected either by stupidity or sloth. (I use 'you' figuratively speaking this isn't necessarily meant as a personal attack.) How about you liberals reach into your OWN pockets for money and take your filthy hands out of mine? -- Gregory Hall Why is it conservatives' arguments always seem to assume liberals don't practice what they preach? *Everyone* who works pays into Social Security, not just Republicans. I pay into it; disabled people (in most cases) paid into it before they became disabled. You don't like welfare and disability; I'm not particularly happy about how much money we spend on the military, particularly on the war in Iraq, where we never should have gone to begin with. I'm not happy about underwriting corporate welfare, or the fact that my tax dollars were partially used to subsidize year-end bonuses for the financial "geniuses" who were largely responsible for the current state of our economy. We individual taxpayers don't get to pick and choose how our dollars are spent. We're all stuck paying for some programs and policies we don't personally support. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...3133219AANXEA3 |
The U.S. is a huge party ― bouncers take out the trash.
The U.S. is a huge party ― bouncers take out the trash;
“ assholes ” get jailed, impoverished or killed. If I can take your money with impunity, as each government has always done, then the money is truly mine, not yours ― get used to it. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 3:43 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 3:14 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. Once on disability = always a leach. Even if you can't work because of a disability it's your family's responsibility or the responsibility of church and charities if you have no family members. Why has it become your RIGHT to force me as a taxpayer to take care of you because you are disabled, in many cases self-inflected either by stupidity or sloth. (I use 'you' figuratively speaking this isn't necessarily meant as a personal attack.) How about you liberals reach into your OWN pockets for money and take your filthy hands out of mine? -- Gregory Hall Why is it conservatives' arguments always seem to assume liberals don't practice what they preach? *Everyone* who works pays into Social Security, not just Republicans. I pay into it; disabled people (in most cases) paid into it before they became disabled. You don't like welfare and disability; I'm not particularly happy about how much money we spend on the military, particularly on the war in Iraq, where we never should have gone to begin with. I'm not happy about underwriting corporate welfare, or the fact that my tax dollars were partially used to subsidize year-end bonuses for the financial "geniuses" who were largely responsible for the current state of our economy. We individual taxpayers don't get to pick and choose how our dollars are spent. We're all stuck paying for some programs and policies we don't personally support. Why is that, Marcia? Well, the answer is simple. It is liberals and socialists who forced these welfare programs on everybody. Conservatives want nothing to do with them but are forced to contribute anyway. So when I say take your filthy hands out of my pocket and reach into your own instead you liberals say, "**** you - we're gonna make everybody pay whether they want to or not." In other words charity doesn't start at home for a liberal. Charity starts by reaching into somebody else's pocket. It's all too easy being generous with somebody else's money, isn't it. But when it comes to donating your own you liberals are such a stingy lot.http://digg.com/politics/Conservativ...e_30_more_than... That's the difference. -- Gregory Hall Okay, Greg. Take my money out of Iraq. Get it out of the pockets of the right-wing bankers who tanked the economy. Give me back my portion of the money that went to the oil companies who continue making record profits every quarter, without reinvesting in refineries, etc., and instead invest in green energy. See where I'm going with this? The Republicans initiated a few programs/policies/wars I don't approve of, but still have to finance. You are aware of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (PRWOR, aka "welfare reform") that took place under Clinton, limiting the amount of time an individual can be eligible for welfare, and enforcing work and/or education requirements on most recipients, right? |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:57:31 -0800 (PST), marcia
wrote: Get it out of the pockets of the right-wing bankers who tanked the economy Didn't realize that Franklin Raines of Freddie and the other idiot at Fannie were right-wingers. Not to mention the Fed. Govt, pressuring the right-wing bankers to make home loans to deadbeats. And it was Jimmy Carter's "Community Reinvestment Act" that started the ball rolling. Willie kept it rolling when he rewrote regulations that would have prevented much of the abuse. You are aware of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (PRWOR, aka "welfare reform") that took place under Clinton, limiting the amount of time an individual can be eligible for welfare, and enforcing work and/or education requirements on most recipients, right? Yeah, a conservative Congress compromised with Willie into changing AFDC into TANF, but abuse still prevails. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
In article ,
says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and who doesn't? You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps. You know about whom I am talking. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control, abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies". -- Kali With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against of those left-wing abominations, Hillary. Your solution for poverty? -- Kali |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 3:43 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 3:14 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. Once on disability = always a leach. Even if you can't work because of a disability it's your family's responsibility or the responsibility of church and charities if you have no family members. Why has it become your RIGHT to force me as a taxpayer to take care of you because you are disabled, in many cases self-inflected either by stupidity or sloth. (I use 'you' figuratively speaking this isn't necessarily meant as a personal attack.) How about you liberals reach into your OWN pockets for money and take your filthy hands out of mine? -- Gregory Hall Why is it conservatives' arguments always seem to assume liberals don't practice what they preach? *Everyone* who works pays into Social Security, not just Republicans. I pay into it; disabled people (in most cases) paid into it before they became disabled. You don't like welfare and disability; I'm not particularly happy about how much money we spend on the military, particularly on the war in Iraq, where we never should have gone to begin with. I'm not happy about underwriting corporate welfare, or the fact that my tax dollars were partially used to subsidize year-end bonuses for the financial "geniuses" who were largely responsible for the current state of our economy. We individual taxpayers don't get to pick and choose how our dollars are spent. We're all stuck paying for some programs and policies we don't personally support. Why is that, Marcia? Well, the answer is simple. It is liberals and socialists who forced these welfare programs on everybody. Conservatives want nothing to do with them but are forced to contribute anyway. So when I say take your filthy hands out of my pocket and reach into your own instead you liberals say, "**** you - we're gonna make everybody pay whether they want to or not." In other words charity doesn't start at home for a liberal. Charity starts by reaching into somebody else's pocket. It's all too easy being generous with somebody else's money, isn't it. But when it comes to donating your own you liberals are such a stingy lot.http://digg.com/politics/Conservativ...e_30_more_than... That's the difference. -- Gregory Hall Okay, Greg. Take my money out of Iraq. Get it out of the pockets of the right-wing bankers who tanked the economy. Give me back my portion of the money that went to the oil companies who continue making record profits every quarter, without reinvesting in refineries, etc., and instead invest in green energy. It doesn't work like that, Marcia. When you agree to have taxes taken out of your paycheck you have no say as to how they are spent. You can't vote for taxes and then whine out loud that you expect to have a say in how they are used. It's too late after the horse is out of the barn. And you're totally wrong about it being bankers who tanked the economy. It was left-wing policies, namely banks being supported by liberals like Barney Frank assisted by the liberal CEO's of Fanny May and Freddy Mac, to lend money for mortages to minorities and other people who could not possibly pay back the loans. (Community Reinvestment Act - the root cause liberal legislation) These bad loans were bought up by Freddy and Fanny and packaged and sold on up the line. When it came to the point where these people who could not possibly pay off loans they never should have been given in the first place started defaulting in droves then the whole Ponzi scheme came tumbling down. This was largely percipitated by oil going up to 150 dollars a barrel and gasoline, diesel and heating oil prices skyrocketing so people used up all their mortgage money paying for energy. This is also caused by liberal polices that restrict drilling and exploration for new petroleum reserves. See where I'm going with this? The Republicans initiated a few programs/policies/wars I don't approve of, but still have to finance. Doesn't matter. The minute you approve of any taxes you give tacit approval of all the things those taxes are used for. As long as you are for any income taxes or payroll taxes you have lost total control of how and where they are spent. You are aware of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (PRWOR, aka "welfare reform") that took place under Clinton, limiting the amount of time an individual can be eligible for welfare, and enforcing work and/or education requirements on most recipients, right? Was that the one the Republican majority in congress crammed down his unwilling throat? -- Gregory Hall |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com