|
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 5:16 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"Kali" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:12:57 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and who doesn't? You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors. A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps. You know about whom I am talking. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors, but if you think I'm not including the pale varirty, perhaps next time I'll say "welfare mammies and sows." Iz zat better? So just the females who get pregnant and have babies. Single and married? Just the single ones? What about the fathers of those children, presumably the "pappies" and the "boars"? And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control, abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies". -- Kali With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against of those left-wing abominations, Hillary. Your solution for poverty? -- Kali It starts with responsible parenting. Are people so ****ing stupid so as not to realize that they should not make babies until they are established? But they don't ca da gubmint will take care of 'em. That's what LBJ told the mammies / sows when he promised us all cradle-to-grave entitlement but delivered the massive welfare state we have today. How about those fathers? It continues with those parents teaching personal responsibility and making the effort to leave the liberals' victim plantation of dependence and self-pity. People who live in poverty have no sense of personal responsibility? Sex education should be delivered by parents. You want to spend taxpayer money to teach Junior and Sally to wait until they're married and most importantly be MONOGAMOUS? They're not going to listen to those "educators" anyway; they certainly haven't the past 50 years. I want children to be educated about sexual reproduction, hormonal changes in young adulthood, birth control options and resources, and STDs and AIDS. Job-finding? Get your nose into the want-ads; you want Uncle Sam to lead you by the hand to employers' doors? Do you know anything about poverty and opportunity? Yeah, I'm all for low-interest or even no-interest tuition money for those needy students who crave education and treat education as a precious gift as we see among many Asians and Jews, Asians and Jews? but for most of the rest of your socialist perks, fahgetaboutit. Your ignorance won't help solve the problem of poverty. Socialism doesn't solve it, but since you mention socialism, may as well mention that capitalism doesn't solve it, either. -- Kali Starvation solves poverty. Allow it to happen. End of problem. Feed the starving and increase the problem. You liberals seem to think you can change the survival of the fittest law. Won't happen. Never has happened in the history of the world. -- Gregory Hall Some of us evolved beyond that point, and are able to incorporate ethics and compassion into our worldview. Your branch of the hominid family tree apparently didn't. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 5:16 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "Kali" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:12:57 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and who doesn't? You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors. A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps. You know about whom I am talking. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors, but if you think I'm not including the pale varirty, perhaps next time I'll say "welfare mammies and sows." Iz zat better? So just the females who get pregnant and have babies. Single and married? Just the single ones? What about the fathers of those children, presumably the "pappies" and the "boars"? And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control, abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies". -- Kali With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against of those left-wing abominations, Hillary. Your solution for poverty? -- Kali It starts with responsible parenting. Are people so ****ing stupid so as not to realize that they should not make babies until they are established? But they don't ca da gubmint will take care of 'em. That's what LBJ told the mammies / sows when he promised us all cradle-to-grave entitlement but delivered the massive welfare state we have today. How about those fathers? It continues with those parents teaching personal responsibility and making the effort to leave the liberals' victim plantation of dependence and self-pity. People who live in poverty have no sense of personal responsibility? Sex education should be delivered by parents. You want to spend taxpayer money to teach Junior and Sally to wait until they're married and most importantly be MONOGAMOUS? They're not going to listen to those "educators" anyway; they certainly haven't the past 50 years. I want children to be educated about sexual reproduction, hormonal changes in young adulthood, birth control options and resources, and STDs and AIDS. Job-finding? Get your nose into the want-ads; you want Uncle Sam to lead you by the hand to employers' doors? Do you know anything about poverty and opportunity? Yeah, I'm all for low-interest or even no-interest tuition money for those needy students who crave education and treat education as a precious gift as we see among many Asians and Jews, Asians and Jews? but for most of the rest of your socialist perks, fahgetaboutit. Your ignorance won't help solve the problem of poverty. Socialism doesn't solve it, but since you mention socialism, may as well mention that capitalism doesn't solve it, either. -- Kali Starvation solves poverty. Allow it to happen. End of problem. Feed the starving and increase the problem. You liberals seem to think you can change the survival of the fittest law. Won't happen. Never has happened in the history of the world. -- Gregory Hall Some of us evolved beyond that point, and are able to incorporate ethics and compassion into our worldview. Your branch of the hominid family tree apparently didn't. Ethics and compassion you proudly finance on the backs of the unwilling who know better. Yah, right! All that you liberals believe in and work for serves only to destroy your pie-in-the-sky reality. -- Gregory Hall |
Please don't feed the rich, swarming like locusts on fossil fuels.
Please don't feed the rich, swarming like locusts on fossil fuels.
|
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 5:28 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 5:16 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "Kali" wrote in message . .. In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:12:57 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and who doesn't? You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors. A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps. You know about whom I am talking. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors, but if you think I'm not including the pale varirty, perhaps next time I'll say "welfare mammies and sows." Iz zat better? So just the females who get pregnant and have babies. Single and married? Just the single ones? What about the fathers of those children, presumably the "pappies" and the "boars"? And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control, abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies". -- Kali With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against of those left-wing abominations, Hillary. Your solution for poverty? -- Kali It starts with responsible parenting. Are people so ****ing stupid so as not to realize that they should not make babies until they are established? But they don't ca da gubmint will take care of 'em. That's what LBJ told the mammies / sows when he promised us all cradle-to-grave entitlement but delivered the massive welfare state we have today. How about those fathers? It continues with those parents teaching personal responsibility and making the effort to leave the liberals' victim plantation of dependence and self-pity. People who live in poverty have no sense of personal responsibility? Sex education should be delivered by parents. You want to spend taxpayer money to teach Junior and Sally to wait until they're married and most importantly be MONOGAMOUS? They're not going to listen to those "educators" anyway; they certainly haven't the past 50 years. I want children to be educated about sexual reproduction, hormonal changes in young adulthood, birth control options and resources, and STDs and AIDS. Job-finding? Get your nose into the want-ads; you want Uncle Sam to lead you by the hand to employers' doors? Do you know anything about poverty and opportunity? Yeah, I'm all for low-interest or even no-interest tuition money for those needy students who crave education and treat education as a precious gift as we see among many Asians and Jews, Asians and Jews? but for most of the rest of your socialist perks, fahgetaboutit. Your ignorance won't help solve the problem of poverty. Socialism doesn't solve it, but since you mention socialism, may as well mention that capitalism doesn't solve it, either. -- Kali Starvation solves poverty. Allow it to happen. End of problem. Feed the starving and increase the problem. You liberals seem to think you can change the survival of the fittest law. Won't happen. Never has happened in the history of the world. -- Gregory Hall Some of us evolved beyond that point, and are able to incorporate ethics and compassion into our worldview. Your branch of the hominid family tree apparently didn't. Ethics and compassion you proudly finance on the backs of the unwilling who know better. Yah, right! All that you liberals believe in and work for serves only to destroy your pie-in-the-sky reality. -- Gregory Hall You proudly finance an unethical war and attendant crimes against humanity on the backs of the unwilling who know better. And now our conversation has come full circle. Yawn. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"marcia" wrote in message
... On Feb 6, 5:28 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 5:16 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "Kali" wrote in message . .. In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:12:57 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and who doesn't? You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors. A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps. You know about whom I am talking. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors, but if you think I'm not including the pale varirty, perhaps next time I'll say "welfare mammies and sows." Iz zat better? So just the females who get pregnant and have babies. Single and married? Just the single ones? What about the fathers of those children, presumably the "pappies" and the "boars"? And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control, abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies". -- Kali With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against of those left-wing abominations, Hillary. Your solution for poverty? -- Kali It starts with responsible parenting. Are people so ****ing stupid so as not to realize that they should not make babies until they are established? But they don't ca da gubmint will take care of 'em. That's what LBJ told the mammies / sows when he promised us all cradle-to-grave entitlement but delivered the massive welfare state we have today. How about those fathers? It continues with those parents teaching personal responsibility and making the effort to leave the liberals' victim plantation of dependence and self-pity. People who live in poverty have no sense of personal responsibility? Sex education should be delivered by parents. You want to spend taxpayer money to teach Junior and Sally to wait until they're married and most importantly be MONOGAMOUS? They're not going to listen to those "educators" anyway; they certainly haven't the past 50 years. I want children to be educated about sexual reproduction, hormonal changes in young adulthood, birth control options and resources, and STDs and AIDS. Job-finding? Get your nose into the want-ads; you want Uncle Sam to lead you by the hand to employers' doors? Do you know anything about poverty and opportunity? Yeah, I'm all for low-interest or even no-interest tuition money for those needy students who crave education and treat education as a precious gift as we see among many Asians and Jews, Asians and Jews? but for most of the rest of your socialist perks, fahgetaboutit. Your ignorance won't help solve the problem of poverty. Socialism doesn't solve it, but since you mention socialism, may as well mention that capitalism doesn't solve it, either. -- Kali Starvation solves poverty. Allow it to happen. End of problem. Feed the starving and increase the problem. You liberals seem to think you can change the survival of the fittest law. Won't happen. Never has happened in the history of the world. -- Gregory Hall Some of us evolved beyond that point, and are able to incorporate ethics and compassion into our worldview. Your branch of the hominid family tree apparently didn't. Ethics and compassion you proudly finance on the backs of the unwilling who know better. Yah, right! All that you liberals believe in and work for serves only to destroy your pie-in-the-sky reality. -- Gregory Hall You proudly finance an unethical war and attendant crimes against humanity on the backs of the unwilling who know better. And now our conversation has come full circle. Yawn. War is not unethical. War is the ANSWER! The spoils always go to the victor. That's another natural law you wimp liberals refuse to believe. More survival of the fittest. -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
"Robb" wrote in message
... Gregory Hall wrote: Starvation solves poverty. Allow it to happen. End of problem. Feed the starving and increase the problem. You liberals seem to think you can change the survival of the fittest law. Won't happen. Never has happened in the history of the world. A Blunderbuss Award for our ignorant rednek hillbilly wingnuts. You help Wayback teach his daughters about gonorrhea, won't you? -- Robb | Shared Secrets Usenet Share your liberal kumbayah with the next terrorist homicide bomber who walks into your restaurant and explodes himself. Spare me your pie-in-the-sky. -- Gregory Hall |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
How many days has the dweeb been in office, not counting Saturdays and Sundays for Vanity Fair photo shoots? India: "You're barking up the wrong tree." EU: "We'll have a trade war." Kirghizistan: "Yankee Go Home!" Iran: "We have lift-off!" His exsistence has been charmed. He's never really earned anything politically: did nothing in the State Senate, had a cup of coffee in the US Senate, and skated into the White House on the shoulders of the media and white liberal "guilt." But he's finding out that other Nations don't pamper him as we do, the latest being socialist Canuckistan whom you would think would be his bed partner. It's going to be interesting watching this empty suit squirm. Yo, Barry, It gets harder. On 06 Feb 2009 22:18:40 GMT, Robb wrote: Gregory Hall wrote: "Way Back Jack" wrote in message ... On 06 Feb 2009 21:38:13 GMT, Robb wrote: Way Back Jack wrote: Yeah, a conservative Congress compromised with Willie into changing AFDC into TANF, but abuse still prevails. Ever going to migrate to the new century Wayback? How many "enterprises" are capable of abusing various states debit systems, anyhow? I'll migrate into socialism with fists flying and feet kicking, twinky. So - abuse of debit systems is 0.00%. Thanks for the acknowledgment. And guns blazing in my case. Yessir, kill kill kill a taxman for jeezus! Both of you are totally mentally owned, mere slaves to a vast liberal left-wing conspiracy. Get potato next week. Week after FEMA Peanut Butter! -- Robb | Shared Secrets Usenet |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On 06 Feb 2009 22:08:12 GMT, Robb wrote:
Way Back Jack wrote: There's plenty of blame to go around but the MSM absolutely refuses to recognize Clinton's rewrite in 1994 when he unveiled his National Homeownership Strategy, which broadened the CRA in ways Congress never intended. Jingo Jingo Jingo all the way. (one minute congress didn't do it, next minute congress did it, and the Media knew nothing). I bet you're against those 'orrible society destroying conspiracies known as the Annenberg Foundation and CFR, arent ya! Got any poison Ameros yet? How about putting all the Mexicans on a boat and sending them to Africa Wayback, would that soothe your soul? The media know plenty, but they just give ya the one side. Wouldn't be so bad if it were only the commentators. But it also includes the journalists. |
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:12:45 -0500, Kali wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:12:57 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and who doesn't? You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors. A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps. You know about whom I am talking. "welfare mammies" http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/mammies/more/ They come in all flavors, but if you think I'm not including the pale varirty, perhaps next time I'll say "welfare mammies and sows." Iz zat better? So just the females who get pregnant and have babies. Single and married? Just the single ones? What about the fathers of those children, presumably the "pappies" and the "boars"? Absolutely. Instead of staying home and making sure little Shantavious and Ayisha, Joe Bob and LuLu Belle are doing their homework, the old man is out spreading his seed all over town, making new babies for me to support. Great example for the kids. And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control, abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies". -- Kali With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against of those left-wing abominations, Hillary. Your solution for poverty? -- Kali It starts with responsible parenting. Are people so ****ing stupid so as not to realize that they should not make babies until they are established? But they don't ca da gubmint will take care of 'em. That's what LBJ told the mammies / sows when he promised us all cradle-to-grave entitlement but delivered the massive welfare state we have today. How about those fathers? Ayuh. It continues with those parents teaching personal responsibility and making the effort to leave the liberals' victim plantation of dependence and self-pity. People who live in poverty have no sense of personal responsibility? A disproporionate share do not. Sex education should be delivered by parents. You want to spend taxpayer money to teach Junior and Sally to wait until they're married and most importantly be MONOGAMOUS? They're not going to listen to those "educators" anyway; they certainly haven't the past 50 years. I want children to be educated about sexual reproduction, hormonal changes in young adulthood, birth control options and resources, and STDs and AIDS. Good. Then you teach them. Job-finding? Get your nose into the want-ads; you want Uncle Sam to lead you by the hand to employers' doors? Do you know anything about poverty and opportunity? Sure. Those who fail to take advantage of the opportunity could end up in poverty. Yeah, I'm all for low-interest or even no-interest tuition money for those needy students who crave education and treat education as a precious gift as we see among many Asians and Jews, Asians and Jews? but for most of the rest of your socialist perks, fahgetaboutit. Your ignorance won't help solve the problem of poverty. Socialism doesn't solve it, but since you mention socialism, may as well mention that capitalism doesn't solve it, either. It starts with personal responsibility. Socialism runs counter to that mindset. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com