Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 05:00:28 GMT, otnmbrd wrote:
Steven Shelikoff wrote: Where's Jim Donahue when ya need him? http://www.defensedaily.com/cgi/av/s...ontimeon.h tm Steve About 4 years ago, my industry (Marine) "sources" started saying that we should not count Loran out, and that plans were beginning to be formulated to update/upgrade the system. To be honest, my reaction, though positive, was not too optimistic. It's nice to read that this is still being considered, though if it does come to pass, I would also hope that they figure out how to increase range and coverage. I don't think there are plans to increase the range and coverage to include, for instance, mid ocean. The plans are to greatly increase the accuracy and to make LORAN a backup stratum 1 time source. That's good for several industries, like cellphones, broadcasters, etc. As long as it covers the coast out to around a few hundred miles, that's good enough for 99.999% of boaters. You usually don't need ot know *exactly* where you are when you're hundreds of miles from anywhere. Only a fool goes offshore/deepsea for extended voyages, with one single navigation method available ..... and six GPS receivers does not mean you have six methods, only that you have 5 backups for one method, maybe. Yup. Steve |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LORAN here to stay? Maybe. | General | |||
88 Evenrude, won't stay running? | Boat Building | |||
How long can a boat stay anchored in one place? | General | |||
Loran vs GPS | General | |||
loran navigation | General |