Gosh jax, you really are consistent in making yourself apear such a stupid
jerk!

Do you remember the early pseudo-interactive programs for PCs in the
80's?
The ones where you would say hello, and it would say, Why do you ask
that?
You would answer, " to be friendly" and it would say" do you feel the
need to be friendly?"
And so forth and so on.

Do you remember the Monty Python routine about argument vs.
contraryism?
Do you remember this post from August 2002?

The world according to SackAshby:

If you say 2+2=4, he'll say 2 ducks and 2 apples don't equal 4 birds.
If you ask why he brings up birds, he'll say it has nothing to do with
math.
You come back to 2+2 IS math, he'll say you heard that from someone 25
years ago.
You say , well 2+2 does equal 4, he'll say you can't add fruit and fowl.

Its an easy game to play, but it is only winnable by longevity, not by
anything that has objective, or even subjective
relevance to the topic. and it's not even novel:

Sack: Now, let's get one thing quite clear... I most definitely told
you!
Person: You did not.
Sack: Yes I did.
Responder: You did not.
Sack: Yes I did.
Responder: Didn't.
Sack: Yes I did.
Responder: Didn't.
Sack: Yes I did!!
Responder: Look this isn't an argument.
Sack: Yes it is.
Responder: No it isn't, it's just contradiction.
Sack: No it isn't.
Responder: Yes it is.
Sack: It is not.
Responder: It is. You just contradicted me.
Sack: No I didn't.
Responder: Ooh, you did!
Sack: No, no, no, no, no.
Responder: You did, just then.
Sack: No, nonsense!
Responder: Oh, look this is futile.
Sack: No it isn't.
Responder: I came here for a good argument.
Sack: No you didn't, you came here for an argument.
Responder: Well, an argument's not the same as contradiction.
Sack: It can be.
Responder: No it can't. An argument is a connected series of statements
intended to establish a definite proposition.
Sack: No it isn't.
Responder: Yes it is. It isn't just contradiction.
Sack: Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.
Responder: But it isn't just saying "No it isn't".
Sack: Yes it is.
Responder: No it isn't, an argument is an intellectual process...
contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other
person says.
Sack: No it isn't.
Responder: Yes it is.
Sack: Not at all.
Responder: Now look!
Sack: Thank you, good morning.
Responder: What?
Sack: That's it. Good morning.
Responder: But I was just getting interested.

Sound familiar?

Jax is pathologic. He is damaged and will never be right in his mind.
He is pathetic, in the true sense of the term. That is easily determined
in
moments. So, the real question is......What excuse do the rest of y'all
have for responding to him?


--

"Florida Keyz" wrote in message
...
| Gosh jax, you really are consistent in making yourself apear such a
stupid
| jerk!
|
|

I respond to him cause he is so easy to F*&k with, very predictable, and its
fun to **** him off.

Florida Keyz wrote:
I respond to him cause he is so easy to F*&k with, very predictable,
and its fun to **** him off.

He doesn't get ****ed off. Don't you get it yet?
YOU are the one ****ed off, and ****ed with.

Do you really think that if there were a shred of rational thought
there,
over 3 years of some very reasonable, factual, in some case irrefutable
posts would have changed something?

He LIVES for this. You provide the means.

you be doofy, dude, as in not even close to 3 digits iq. you be even doofier
dude, because you still try to tell the world that your 82 is within two points
of as high as iq's can get.

but you are right in one aspect, that is it is impossible to get upset when
someone like floriday non-boater keys can't kept up with the 4th grade class.

From: "spare-me-spam"
Date: 7/7/2004 7:33 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id:

Florida Keyz wrote:
I respond to him cause he is so easy to F*&k with, very predictable,
and its fun to **** him off.

He doesn't get ****ed off. Don't you get it yet?
YOU are the one ****ed off, and ****ed with.

Do you really think that if there were a shred of rational thought
there,
over 3 years of some very reasonable, factual, in some case irrefutable
posts would have changed something?

He LIVES for this. You provide the means.

see what I mean, he is so stupid, he does not even realize how dumb he apears.

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 13:56:25 -0400, "spare-me-spam"
wrote:

So, the real question is......What excuse do the rest of y'all
have for responding to him?

Because I don't have scabs to pick and I now need reading glasses to
pull the wings off flies?

JAX averages about two posts a month of average lucidity that
demonstrates he isn't a Speedo-wearing shut-in with delusions of
boating, or at least at one time wasn't. The rest of the time the
static overwhelms the signal, and you nailed his slightly dyslexic
M.O. exactly.

It's instructive to see real-life examples of pathology, and JAX vs.
boating newsgroup posters is like participating in an endless Stanley
Milgram experiment: it's amazing how a cadre of six or so posters will
continue to up the voltage well past the pain threshold because JAX
goads them into a pretense of debate.

It's funny if you let it be, like a Bill Hicks routine.

R.

short stuff? are you okay?

From: rhys
Date: 7/7/2004 3:13 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id:

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 13:56:25 -0400, "spare-me-spam"
wrote:

So, the real question is......What excuse do the rest of y'all
have for responding to him?

Because I don't have scabs to pick and I now need reading glasses to
pull the wings off flies?

JAX averages about two posts a month of average lucidity that
demonstrates he isn't a Speedo-wearing shut-in with delusions of
boating, or at least at one time wasn't. The rest of the time the
static overwhelms the signal, and you nailed his slightly dyslexic
M.O. exactly.

It's instructive to see real-life examples of pathology, and JAX vs.
boating newsgroup posters is like participating in an endless Stanley
Milgram experiment: it's amazing how a cadre of six or so posters will
continue to up the voltage well past the pain threshold because JAX
goads them into a pretense of debate.

It's funny if you let it be, like a Bill Hicks routine.

R.

pipsqueak? are you okay?


From: "spare-me-spam"
Date: 7/7/2004 1:56 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id:

Do you remember the early pseudo-interactive programs for PCs in the
80's?
The ones where you would say hello, and it would say, Why do you ask
that?
You would answer, " to be friendly" and it would say" do you feel the
need to be friendly?"
And so forth and so on.

Do you remember the Monty Python routine about argument vs.
contraryism?
Do you remember this post from August 2002?

The world according to SackAshby:

If you say 2+2=4, he'll say 2 ducks and 2 apples don't equal 4 birds.
If you ask why he brings up birds, he'll say it has nothing to do with
math.
You come back to 2+2 IS math, he'll say you heard that from someone 25
years ago.
You say , well 2+2 does equal 4, he'll say you can't add fruit and fowl.

Its an easy game to play, but it is only winnable by longevity, not by
anything that has objective, or even subjective
relevance to the topic. and it's not even novel:

Sack: Now, let's get one thing quite clear... I most definitely told
you!
Person: You did not.
Sack: Yes I did.
Responder: You did not.
Sack: Yes I did.
Responder: Didn't.
Sack: Yes I did.
Responder: Didn't.
Sack: Yes I did!!
Responder: Look this isn't an argument.
Sack: Yes it is.
Responder: No it isn't, it's just contradiction.
Sack: No it isn't.
Responder: Yes it is.
Sack: It is not.
Responder: It is. You just contradicted me.
Sack: No I didn't.
Responder: Ooh, you did!
Sack: No, no, no, no, no.
Responder: You did, just then.
Sack: No, nonsense!
Responder: Oh, look this is futile.
Sack: No it isn't.
Responder: I came here for a good argument.
Sack: No you didn't, you came here for an argument.
Responder: Well, an argument's not the same as contradiction.
Sack: It can be.
Responder: No it can't. An argument is a connected series of statements
intended to establish a definite proposition.
Sack: No it isn't.
Responder: Yes it is. It isn't just contradiction.
Sack: Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.
Responder: But it isn't just saying "No it isn't".
Sack: Yes it is.
Responder: No it isn't, an argument is an intellectual process...
contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other
person says.
Sack: No it isn't.
Responder: Yes it is.
Sack: Not at all.
Responder: Now look!
Sack: Thank you, good morning.
Responder: What?
Sack: That's it. Good morning.
Responder: But I was just getting interested.

Sound familiar?

Jax is pathologic. He is damaged and will never be right in his mind.
He is pathetic, in the true sense of the term. That is easily determined
in
moments. So, the real question is......What excuse do the rest of y'all
have for responding to him?


--

"Florida Keyz" wrote in message
...
| Gosh jax, you really are consistent in making yourself apear such a
stupid
| jerk!
|
|

namecalling Jax, is for the ignorant....But then if the shoe does fit
you.....................

you can't possibly survive in the real world with that personality of yours.