where is "Bernie the Bunyip"

bertie crashes and burns to a mental crispy critter when people ignore him.

On 29 Jun 2004 13:09:30 GMT, something compelled
(JAXAshby), to say:

As I recall you got yourself worked up in snitty lather when I said that as a
young man I had dated two differenct centerfolds

Isn't that navel staple a bitch?

ah, steve? in real life they don't have a staple in their navel.

see, steve, you learned soemthing new today.


As I recall you got yourself worked up in snitty lather when I said that as
a
young man I had dated two differenct centerfolds

Isn't that navel staple a bitch?

On 29 Jun 2004 13:09:30 GMT, something compelled
(JAXAshby), to say:

As I recall you got yourself worked up in snitty lather when I said that as a
young man I had dated two differenct centerfolds

Is that when you learned the value of "pre-lube"?

stubby daniels tries out a new word he leanred two days ago thusly:

As I recall you got yourself worked up in snitty lather when I said that as
a
young man I had dated two differenct centerfolds

Is that when you learned the value of "pre-lube"?


no, I knew the value of proper engine care while still young enough to think
the women of Playboy as "older women".

if ya wanna know the kind of guys Jax is, go to

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...7ffb.040628165
2.401f1f69%40posting.google.com

Here is my favorite quote from that site:
"Jax, your an arrogant, ingnorant asshole"

Kinda says it all , don't it.

Jax said"
As I recall you got yourself worked up in snitty lather when I said that as
a
young man I had dated two differenct centerfolds
"

That is true, in the Gay Mens Monthly!

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:38:08 GMT,
Remco Moedt wrote:
On 29 Jun 2004 02:48:28 -0700, (OpalCat) wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/3cm2g for anyone interested (doubt that's many
people, but there you have it.)

Hehe, you certainly look better than Jax!

Cheers!


Remco

PS, I made a mistake, I DID load the picture at work... :-/ Well, it
wasn't as bad when I loaded that porn site with sound :-(




Interesting to see that Jax maintains his (poor) credibility other
places than just here.

--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
If I want to hear the pitter patter of little feet, I'll
put shoes on my dog.

(JAXAshby) wrote in message ...

I stopped posting on that board when one poster sent a letter bomb to another
poster (who turned out to be 15 years old) killing the poster's friend (also 15 years old).

Err... that never happened. I don't know what drugs you're on, but
it's not fair to not share with the group.

And seven or eight years later you STILL search the net late at night to see
where I might have posted

Err, no, I didn't search. I was sent a link. Trust me, you don't cross
my mind except when someone emails me to tell me you're at it again.

Jeff,

The question you ask is simply to vague to provide a spacific answer.

The considerations come from:
Number of cold starts
Number of thermal cycles
Hours of operation at rated output
Hours of operation at idle only load
Hours of operation at less than rated output

In roughly that order.

A cold start is any time the engine gets cranked to fire. This
contaminates the oil and is the time of worst lubrication.
A thermal cycle is any time that the engine is run long enough to get to
operating temperature. This means that all those part have to push on
each other and side and move and it is how things leak or crack.
Hours of operation at rated load actually cause little damage, but it
should be the most common operating condition. This is when/where
piston rings and valve seats wear.
Hours of idle only load beat the bejesus out of the valve gear, and the
rings and pistons don't really fit because that only happens at rated
load.
Hours of operation at less than rated load, but enough to achieve proper
operating temperature will do the least harm. The question would be why
you are not using the engine as designed? Reserve power is nice, but it
is expensive as a first cost consideration (why most sailboat have just
enough power).

I hope this either gave you an answer that you understand or enough
information to phase another question. In the case of the later, I'm
here a lot - try again.

Matt Colie
See prior sig this date


Tamaroak wrote:

So which is easier on my engine, short period at high speed and load, or
long period at low load and speed?

Capt. jeff