Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#112
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#113
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JAXAshby wrote:
chris, you numb knuts. the discussion was about aircraft engines built in the last sixty years. Those engines were built within the last 60 years, moron. Besides that little demonstration of your continuing ignorance of aircraft engines, I don't see where you were discussing aircraft engines. Your only contribution is a few one line insults of the same very low quality as all of your posts tend to be. You don't know enough about aircraft engines, or any engine, to discuss them here. Your attempts to do so just provide more evidence of your bizarre pathology. They are in the same class as your speedo pictures, humiliating at best. Give it up, Jax, you don't have a clue about anything you claim expertise. Your own bizarre statements prove you have zero experience of engines at all much less aircraft engines. It appears that you really do fit the descriptions of the loser who will accept any attention for any reason rather than continue in your empty world alone. Yeah, you are famous alright ... now take your pills and read some more Walter Mitty stories. Rick |
#114
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, when you became a professional mechanic at twelve, you did NOT
drop out of school? well, come to think of it I did drop out of school at age 12. For the entire summer, which happened to be the time when customers needed the engines fixed. Now I'm curious, what IS a professional mechanic in your eyes? someone who charges money in a commercial environment to repair engines customers are unable or unwilling to repair themselves. |
#115
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One does not edit to show respect for the reader, one edits to
show respect for himself. yeah, sure. if saying that makes you feel important in the cosmos, have at it. |
#116
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rick, you live in a universe of your own making. it is a common problem to
those way behind the power curve IQ-wise. chris, you numb knuts. the discussion was about aircraft engines built in the last sixty years. Those engines were built within the last 60 years, moron. Besides that little demonstration of your continuing ignorance of aircraft engines, I don't see where you were discussing aircraft engines. Your only contribution is a few one line insults of the same very low quality as all of your posts tend to be. You don't know enough about aircraft engines, or any engine, to discuss them here. Your attempts to do so just provide more evidence of your bizarre pathology. They are in the same class as your speedo pictures, humiliating at best. Give it up, Jax, you don't have a clue about anything you claim expertise. Your own bizarre statements prove you have zero experience of engines at all much less aircraft engines. It appears that you really do fit the descriptions of the loser who will accept any attention for any reason rather than continue in your empty world alone. Yeah, you are famous alright ... now take your pills and read some more Walter Mitty stories. Rick |
#117
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JAXAshby wrote:
Only one more of his one line retorts rather than address the issues ... Jax, you are running true to form. You have nothing on which to base your arguments, you have been trashed again by those of us who know and do what you can only dream about, and now all you can do is paste lame insults. You are a loser Jax. A Walter Mitty wannabe loser who has nothing but a computer to fill out an empty existence. What's the matter loser, afraid to talk about engines? You should be you don't know squat about them and it shows. Tell us again how pulling the prop over "prelubes" the engine ... Don't you want to talk about the engines that actually prevent oil from entering the oil pump during a start? Way over your head but that doesn't take too much as we all can see. Bwahahahahahahahahahah What a freakin' moron. Rick |
#118
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Kearns wrote:
Apparently, our "professional" mechanic is unaware that radials and inverted inlines are still in production. Among the countless technical issues on which Jax is "unaware." I just love the way he expounds on a subject as if he were an expert and then posts a whammy like that one ... we don't need to slap him around, he does it so well himself. He will fade away again soon, he is already avoiding all discussion of oil and aircraft engines ... backpedaling on his "carpenter" days now that he has been caught there too. What a loser. Rick |
#119
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So how will I get the maximum use from my 5.7 liter GMC in my cruiser?
I'm running Amsoil 15-40 marine diesel synthetic oil in it and will report when it dies. Another question: Which is easier on the engine, ten miles up on plane for a half hour at 3600 rpm or ten miles for an hour and two thirds at hull speed at 1600 rpm? Capt. Jeff |
#120
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday 25 June 2004 4:34 pm in rec.boats.cruising Rick wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote: Apparently, our "professional" mechanic is unaware that radials and inverted inlines are still in production. Among the countless technical issues on which Jax is "unaware." I just love the way he expounds on a subject as if he were an expert and then posts a whammy like that one ... we don't need to slap him around, he does it so well himself. I dont see his postings, he is in my killfile, but it nice to quietly drop a hook like "5 blades" and wait for him to bite. Hook, line and sinker B-). -- My real address is crn (at) netunix (dot) com WARNING all messages containing attachments or html will be silently deleted. Send only plain text. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Problems with Stingray Boat HELP | Cruising | |||
Mercury 60 HP Problems | General | |||
Mercruiser 470 Problems - can somebody help ? | General | |||
help....power loss problems? | General |