Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... Interesting way to look at the disaster that's our own making... I think we need to fix our problems, urgent problems that affect the hordes of people who would move away from the coasts (for example) but are unable to do so. There's an economic issue that is being swept under the rug with this sort of argument. Not only are the vast numbers of poor unable to "just move," but the cost of relocating them and/or populations centers is non-trivial, and would make the currect financial debacle look like a zit on a flea's butt. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com By saying "just move," you trivialize the logistics of the problem, which is something I haven't done. I didn't say it would be easy, I didn't say it would be cheap. But there are many, many examples of former cities which are now under lots of water. Those who refused to move either grew gills or drowned. Probably doesn't matter a whole lot now, since they'd have died a few thousand years ago anyway, but my point remains. Building Pompeii and Herculaneum near the foot of Mt. Vesuvius was a reall bad idea, as it turned out. Those who moved before the blast got to live longer lives than those who were trying to build a big cork. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
et... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... Interesting way to look at the disaster that's our own making... I think we need to fix our problems, urgent problems that affect the hordes of people who would move away from the coasts (for example) but are unable to do so. There's an economic issue that is being swept under the rug with this sort of argument. Not only are the vast numbers of poor unable to "just move," but the cost of relocating them and/or populations centers is non-trivial, and would make the currect financial debacle look like a zit on a flea's butt. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com By saying "just move," you trivialize the logistics of the problem, which is something I haven't done. I didn't say it would be easy, I didn't say it would be cheap. But there are many, many examples of former cities which are now under lots of water. Those who refused to move either grew gills or drowned. Probably doesn't matter a whole lot now, since they'd have died a few thousand years ago anyway, but my point remains. Building Pompeii and Herculaneum near the foot of Mt. Vesuvius was a reall bad idea, as it turned out. Those who moved before the blast got to live longer lives than those who were trying to build a big cork. Like Venice and the Netherlands? My argument was that instead of spending trillions to move those who can't move on their own, why not spend far less dealing with the pollution, expanding sustainable energy technology, etc.? Makes sense to me, but oh-my-god the government might have to make it a priority. How terrible. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Global warming? | General | |||
More on Global Warming... | General | |||
More On Global Warming | ASA | |||
First global warming, now this!!! | ASA | |||
More on Global Warming | ASA |