Larry wrote:

I'm watching a mother laying dead on a stretcher next to her two dead
children as her husband screams in horror over the three corpses as the
United States/Iwraeli genocide continues.

I saw the aftermath of a Hamas rocket hitting a kindergarden the other
day,,,, how about damning that...twit

Martin

Marty wrote in
news
I saw the aftermath of a Hamas rocket hitting a kindergarden the other
day,,,, how about damning that...twit

Martin



So, if your neighbor murders your son, it's ok for you to kill them all?

That's not what the cops say where I live. It's NOT OK for me to kill off
the neighbors if they kill someone of mine. I'll certainly want to, but we
are a society of laws. We don't just start banging away on the neighbors
with our M-16s trying to see how many we can kill. That leads to anarchy
and everyone dies.

Why is murder OK when it's done by Zionists? I've wondered that for years.

Larry wrote:
Marty wrote in
news
I saw the aftermath of a Hamas rocket hitting a kindergarden the other
day,,,, how about damning that...twit

Martin



So, if your neighbor murders your son, it's ok for you to kill them all?

That's not what the cops say where I live. It's NOT OK for me to kill off
the neighbors if they kill someone of mine. I'll certainly want to, but we
are a society of laws. We don't just start banging away on the neighbors
with our M-16s trying to see how many we can kill. That leads to anarchy
and everyone dies.

Why is murder OK when it's done by Zionists? I've wondered that for years.


Flip that over. You're saying its ok for the Hamas to murder? Of
course you're not, but how do you stop them? Have the UN tell them to
behave?
Give us a good solution.
Gordon

"Gordon" wrote in message
m...
Larry wrote:
Marty wrote in
news
I saw the aftermath of a Hamas rocket hitting a kindergarden the other
day,,,, how about damning that...twit

Martin



So, if your neighbor murders your son, it's ok for you to kill them all?

That's not what the cops say where I live. It's NOT OK for me to kill
off the neighbors if they kill someone of mine. I'll certainly want to,
but we are a society of laws. We don't just start banging away on the
neighbors with our M-16s trying to see how many we can kill. That leads
to anarchy and everyone dies.

Why is murder OK when it's done by Zionists? I've wondered that for
years.


Flip that over. You're saying its ok for the Hamas to murder? Of course
you're not, but how do you stop them? Have the UN tell them to behave?
Give us a good solution.
Gordon

Give them everything they want. Anything less than complete capitulation and
the violence will continue. Of course there would still be hold-outs, even
then. And violence from holdouts on the other side will increase
exponentially. If the world were made up entirely of reasonable people, a
peaceful solution to the Israeli/Palestinian problem could be found.
Unfortunately, it's not, and one won't be.

The most rational thing the US can do in this situation is to refuse to take
sides and turn peacekeeping over to the UN. But it's far too late for that,
I fear.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
Marty wrote in
news
I saw the aftermath of a Hamas rocket hitting a kindergarden the other
day,,,, how about damning that...twit

Martin



So, if your neighbor murders your son, it's ok for you to kill them all?

That's not what the cops say where I live. It's NOT OK for me to kill off
the neighbors if they kill someone of mine. I'll certainly want to, but
we
are a society of laws. We don't just start banging away on the neighbors
with our M-16s trying to see how many we can kill. That leads to anarchy
and everyone dies.

Why is murder OK when it's done by Zionists? I've wondered that for
years.



Laws of society? Yet you just got done telling me how all Jews should die or
AH should have "finished" the job.

You're a loon.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

wrote in message
news
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:03:00 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Larry" wrote in message
. ..
Marty wrote in
news
I saw the aftermath of a Hamas rocket hitting a kindergarden the other
day,,,, how about damning that...twit

Martin



So, if your neighbor murders your son, it's ok for you to kill them all?

That's not what the cops say where I live. It's NOT OK for me to kill
off
the neighbors if they kill someone of mine. I'll certainly want to, but
we
are a society of laws. We don't just start banging away on the
neighbors
with our M-16s trying to see how many we can kill. That leads to
anarchy
and everyone dies.

Why is murder OK when it's done by Zionists? I've wondered that for
years.



Laws of society? Yet you just got done telling me how all Jews should die
or
AH should have "finished" the job.

You're a loon.

So why do you insist on debating with a loon? Do you think he will
suddenly stop being a loon if you argue with him enough?



Yes, you're right of course. It's a fine line between not allowing racist
stuff to go without saying anything and thus condoning it and ignoring loons
as a matter of policy.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:37:30 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

wrote in message
news
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:03:00 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Larry" wrote in message
3...
Marty wrote in
news
I saw the aftermath of a Hamas rocket hitting a kindergarden the
other
day,,,, how about damning that...twit

Martin



So, if your neighbor murders your son, it's ok for you to kill them
all?

That's not what the cops say where I live. It's NOT OK for me to kill
off
the neighbors if they kill someone of mine. I'll certainly want to,
but
we
are a society of laws. We don't just start banging away on the
neighbors
with our M-16s trying to see how many we can kill. That leads to
anarchy
and everyone dies.

Why is murder OK when it's done by Zionists? I've wondered that for
years.



Laws of society? Yet you just got done telling me how all Jews should
die
or
AH should have "finished" the job.

You're a loon.

So why do you insist on debating with a loon? Do you think he will
suddenly stop being a loon if you argue with him enough?



Yes, you're right of course. It's a fine line between not allowing racist
stuff to go without saying anything and thus condoning it and ignoring
loons
as a matter of policy.

You can point out that a post is racist with one post in that thread
if you feel that every one is is less intelligent than you are and
can't figure it out themselves. That is not the same thing as engaging
in a debate.



I doubt that I'm more intelligent than anyone else here, which is doubless
why I posted multiple times on the subject.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
snip
I doubt that I'm more intelligent than anyone else here, which is doubless
why I posted multiple times on the subject.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com


You should have typed 'doubtlessly" (not doubless). Aside from the incorrect
spelling of the root word you compounded your folly by not using it as an
adjective. "Which is (doubtlessly) why."

You and Dave are equally illiterate. Or, perhaps I should say "equal
illiterate?? Bwaahahhahahah.


Wilbur Hubbard

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:11:47 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

You should have typed 'doubtlessly" (not doubless). Aside from the
incorrect
spelling of the root word you compounded your folly by not using it as an
adjective. "Which is (doubtlessly) why."

You need to clear up your muddled thought and expression, Neal. Are you
alleging that "doubtless" is an adjective, or that "doubtlessly" is an
adjective?

Without a doubt, it's doubtlessly when used as an adjective.

Perhaps I should commence writing to you using lower Flesch-Kincaid grade
level scores?

Wilbur Hubbard

On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:11:47 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

You should have typed 'doubtlessly" (not doubless). Aside from the incorrect
spelling of the root word you compounded your folly by not using it as an
adjective. "Which is (doubtlessly) why."

I don't have the original from Wilbur, he's in my KF. How I managed to read the post of his below must be down to poor KF management on my part. That he has the audacity to post the above, when he wrote what is below is beyond me.

In article s.com, Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

I agree. I've got the spaces between the component (inner liner) and
the hull all poured with two-part, urethane closed-cell foam. It makes

The word 'all' in the above is completely redundant, and using it there makes you look a fool. You've named what is being referenced, so there is no need for 'all'.


the boat stronger, quieter, unsinkable and eliminates the condensation
in all but the most ideal conditions for it.

"The boat stronger" what does that mean?

Ending a sentence with a preposition?! Wilbur, surely, with
qualifications that entitle you to criticise how is it possible you
could make such a mistake?


The overhead will get
condensation on it when cooking and boiling water but that's about it
and that soon evaporates.

Water vapour will condense on it, it doesn't "get condensation on it".
The condensation hasn't arrived there from somewhere else, one is the
condenser and the other the condensate. For it to 'get condensation on
it' the vapour must condense elsewhere and then, somehow, transfer.
Perhaps you meant to say "water will condense on it".


Also keeping the hatches open when aboard, which is most of the time
for us real sailors,

OK, this one isn't a grammar/spelling error, but, dammit, it wasn't
spotted by anybody: Living on a boat doesn't make you a real sailor.
*Sailing* is what makes people sailors.


helps keep the boat surfaces and air temperature
in synch so you're correct there Karin.

Now you don't know to whom you are replying.


If a boat doesn't have an insulated hull it's going to sweat and their
is nothing that can be done

Their?! WTF?!

Wilbur, please don't criticise other's use of the language when you
butcher it so badly yourself.


Justin.

--
Justin C, by the sea.